Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
40. You think so?
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 10:21 PM
Aug 2013

I suppose that depends on where you set your standards. if by "War on Islam" you picture a religious holy war for church and God, then no, there is no war on Islam.

if you take a look at US policies towards the Middle east, North Africa, and Southwestern Asia, however? We certainly seem to be making a lot of effort to destroy or subjugate lands peopled by Muslims, don't we? Maybe Islam is simply incidental, but I promise you, the people being fucked over by us don't see it that way.

Do you think the US is committed to peace, justice, and democracy in the Muslim world? Consider this.

Our greatest ally in the region is an openly theocratic / fascist monarchy that utilizes our extensive military aid explicitly to subjugate its own population (I'm talking about Saudi Arabia, if anyone's puzzled.) We support them. Full tilt. When they chop the heads off of people for being gay, we might mumble about it, but we still write the checks and send them the tanks and jets.

However, we are nearly rabid in our obsessive opposition to the Assad regime of Syria - a secular and fascist regime - as well as to the government of Iran, a theocratic democracy (yeah, that does sound weird, but it's how they roll.) We are so opposed to these nations, that we supplied Saddam Hussein with chemical weapons, knowing fully well he would use them against civilian populations in Iran. We are right now fueling the insurgency in Syria which, if successful WILL plunge Syria into the sort of violent chaos we see in Somalia or Afghanistan. That's how much we hate these regimes.

But wait, isn't a secular fascism at least a little better than a theocratic one, by American standards? Wouldn't a theocratic democracy, by the same token, be at least a little better than a theocratic monarchy? If we're going to go with the lesser of two (or three?) evils, then shouldn't it be Saudi Arabia that gets left high and dry? it's certainly a more brutal regime than either Syria or Iran (which yes, is saying quite a lot)

Here's the thing... Saudi Arabia does what the US says. They're compliant. We utilize their money and influence to manipulate other state in the region, and so we pat their little bungee-corded heads and accept the brutal totalitaninism of their regime. Iran and Syria are independent of the US - Iran is truly independent, while Syria is under the Russian sphere. They don't follow our demands, they don't pay us tribute, and so we endeavor to punish or destroy them. Just as we have destroyed two other nations that became noncompliant - that also happen to be Muslim nations. Hell, we effectively destroyed Iran once already with our overthrow of its democracy and the installation of a brutal, bloodthirsty dictator.

We also oppose movements for democracy in the region. We opposed every single motion of the Arab Spring, after the surprise in Tunisia. We opposed the overthrow of Mubarak, we helped suppress the Arab spring in Bahrain, we poo-pooed movements in Libya, in Algeria, in Morocco, in Jordan, in Lebanon, and in Syria. We later came back to Libya and Syria once thigns started getting violent, and decided to throw guns and money into the mix... Which is as bold an endorsement of violence over peaceful resolution as anything i can imagine. Why? because we liked these dictatorships. we were happy with Mubarak, and while we didn't care much for Ghadaffi and Assad, they were known factors we were cozy with all the same. The idea of the fellahin ("dirty peasants&quot staging democratic revolutions was something the united states could not, would not, and did not tolerate.

We are on a crusade, hrmjustin. it's not in the name of Jesus, but the people in the crosshairs share the same religion that was targeted back then. Our crusade is to force the peoples of the middle east and North Africa into subjugation to the US, or into destitution and anarchy. It's about securing resources (primarily oil) for ourselves, while denying those resources to other players in the world - and exterminating local opposition to these twinned goals.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

When in doubt, blame it on the Jews. geek tragedy Aug 2013 #1
Don't forget that he was also a strong supporter of Assad in Syria. And then there's Iran . . . branford Aug 2013 #3
Actually, he'd be more proud of you Scootaloo Aug 2013 #13
Yeah, all of those wacky Stormfront conspiracy theories blaming 'Zionists' and the "Mossad" geek tragedy Aug 2013 #16
Except we're not talking about "wacky stormfront conspiracy theories" Scootaloo Aug 2013 #31
To be honest, it's more plausible that the Mossad controls geek tragedy Aug 2013 #33
Except Erdogan isn't saying "Mossad controls Egypt's military" Scootaloo Aug 2013 #36
Because the Saudis funnel aid to Egypt geek tragedy Aug 2013 #37
Wow, really? Scootaloo Aug 2013 #38
Considering Netanyahu's track record . . . another_liberal Aug 2013 #2
Track record of what - opposing violent Islamists? branford Aug 2013 #5
His track record of . . . another_liberal Aug 2013 #7
What is Netanyahu's track record in governing Egypt? Silly. nt geek tragedy Aug 2013 #6
Never heard of the Mossad? another_liberal Aug 2013 #9
So, the Mossad is in charge of Egypt's military now? Jeebus, listen to yourself, nt geek tragedy Aug 2013 #11
I suspect you are being intentionally obtuse? another_liberal Aug 2013 #25
You're right about that leftynyc Aug 2013 #43
Those who are blinded by bias . . . another_liberal Aug 2013 #44
Tell me about it leftynyc Aug 2013 #45
Bias is as bias does. another_liberal Aug 2013 #54
What a sleazy pos. jessie04 Aug 2013 #4
Let's see what the Trukish President's proof actually is. another_liberal Aug 2013 #8
He's making shit up, and I really pity anyone not able geek tragedy Aug 2013 #14
Pity anyone you want. another_liberal Aug 2013 #27
Notice he doesnt release this "proof" ? jessie04 Aug 2013 #24
He may have to . . . another_liberal Aug 2013 #26
Still waiting for that amazing proof. jessie04 Aug 2013 #67
Yes, by all means . . . another_liberal Aug 2013 #69
If he never delivers, what will be your opinion then ? jessie04 Aug 2013 #70
If President Erdagon never produces evidence to support his accusation? another_liberal Aug 2013 #71
And i'm STIILL waiting for that devastating proof. jessie04 Aug 2013 #72
Day 6 jessie04 Aug 2013 #73
Day 7 jessie04 Aug 2013 #74
Day 8 jessie04 Aug 2013 #77
Day 10 jessie04 Aug 2013 #79
Day 11. jessie04 Aug 2013 #82
Hasbara trolls Steviehh Aug 2013 #10
I predict the mossad will cause your account to be cancelled, because you have geek tragedy Aug 2013 #12
Don't be so sure.. markpkessinger Aug 2013 #19
I've seen enough of this kind of troll to predict. geek tragedy Aug 2013 #20
So anytime you bait someone... jessie04 Aug 2013 #22
Cool! another_liberal Aug 2013 #28
No matter how stupid, leftynyc Aug 2013 #46
I see none of those qualities in the posts in question. another_liberal Aug 2013 #48
Of course you don't leftynyc Aug 2013 #49
OMG! another_liberal Aug 2013 #51
I couldn't possibly care less (n/t) leftynyc Aug 2013 #53
You don't comprehend sarcasm either? another_liberal Aug 2013 #55
Yawn leftynyc Aug 2013 #56
I'm just not as gullible as some . . . another_liberal Aug 2013 #61
I hope it's not too painful to keep leftynyc Aug 2013 #62
I support democracy . . . another_liberal Aug 2013 #64
Bullshit leftynyc Aug 2013 #65
Don't tell me what my opinions are. another_liberal Aug 2013 #68
Quite a post. jessie04 Aug 2013 #21
I think the poster makes a fair point about U.S. hypocrisy concerning democratically elected ... markpkessinger Aug 2013 #23
Don't forget . . . another_liberal Aug 2013 #29
Indeed. n/t markpkessinger Aug 2013 #30
There is no war against Islam. hrmjustin Aug 2013 #32
You think so? Scootaloo Aug 2013 #40
Well written post and I agree that our foreign policy is a mess and is hypocritical. hrmjustin Aug 2013 #41
I see a huge John2 Aug 2013 #57
I simply didn't want to bother discussing Israel; I get enough of that in I/P Scootaloo Aug 2013 #58
Post removed Post removed Aug 2013 #66
Boy, you just don't know what side anybody is on anymore. nt bemildred Aug 2013 #15
It is a dynamic situation Harmony Blue Aug 2013 #34
All true enough, I was talking more about old alliances & friendships which now lie in ruins. bemildred Aug 2013 #35
Indeed... Syria had united the Zionists, Turkey, and the Gulf dictators; now divided on Egypt! Alamuti Lotus Aug 2013 #47
Well, you know better than I, but yeah. bemildred Aug 2013 #59
"The Zionists" ? oberliner Aug 2013 #75
That's all you took from my post? Alamuti Lotus Aug 2013 #76
I appreciate your response oberliner Aug 2013 #78
With any luck, Erdogan would go next. David__77 Aug 2013 #17
Unfortunately, Edrogan represents majority sentiment in Turkey. geek tragedy Aug 2013 #18
There were massive protests in June but he cracked down hard. joshcryer Aug 2013 #50
+1000 n/t Catherina Aug 2013 #81
The White House should not have been so nice in the words they chose to use. William769 Aug 2013 #39
True jessie04 Aug 2013 #42
It does make sense for him to say that. He's bathing in the same tub as Morsi. Democracyinkind Aug 2013 #52
Still waiting for that "double secret proof" jessie04 Aug 2013 #60
+1000 leftynyc Aug 2013 #63
The coalition we're counting on seems to be unraveling fast. Catherina Aug 2013 #80
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Turkish Prime Minister Er...»Reply #40