Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

jessie04

(1,528 posts)
5. Oh sure... Blame Assad.
Sat Sep 7, 2013, 10:34 AM
Sep 2013

And that's supposed to make us mad ?

Why should we get involved ? We should care about those innocents gasping their last breath?

No, progressive means pacifism.

And so what if he uses chemical weapons again....and more kids die mercilessly from asphyxiation.







I think that's sarcasm.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

This Iliyah Sep 2013 #1
THIS: "appears to have been" Coyotl Sep 2013 #4
I keep hoping that there will be news though that it was a rogue officer or an accidental release by cstanleytech Sep 2013 #2
I suspect a Syrian govt rocket hit a rebel nerve gas stash. Mysterysouppe Sep 2013 #59
Sadly though thats looking more and more unlikely but it would kinda be nice if that turned out to cstanleytech Sep 2013 #61
Time for Geneva II. David__77 Sep 2013 #3
Geneva 2 would seek a diplomatic solution and require the insurgents to negotiate. dipsydoodle Sep 2013 #8
Some people can't face facts. nt SunSeeker Sep 2013 #14
Oh sure... Blame Assad. jessie04 Sep 2013 #5
Those innocents gasping their last breath which many involved children Iliyah Sep 2013 #6
I care about Syrians being slaughtered by radical terrorists. David__77 Sep 2013 #13
By 'radical terrorists', you are talking about the United States, correct? RC Sep 2013 #53
and the folks gasping their last breath under a pile of rubble caused by a "humanitarian strike?" frylock Sep 2013 #38
Caring about those innocents gasping their last breath does not excuse an illegal military attack. totodeinhere Sep 2013 #9
Illegal , huh? jessie04 Sep 2013 #15
This level of intensity on your part might seem admirable if it did not have as preamble Bluenorthwest Sep 2013 #16
Obviously all civilized society can only do so much. jessie04 Sep 2013 #20
You don't care how many people are killed by our bombs . . . another_liberal Sep 2013 #25
I wont even dignify that with an answer. jessie04 Sep 2013 #27
Why not explain why it is so silly of a question? another_liberal Sep 2013 #29
you won't answer because you don't have an answer frylock Sep 2013 #39
. jessie04 Sep 2013 #43
It is a very pertinent question. Do you care how many we kill to 'revenge' and 'punish' a man Bluenorthwest Sep 2013 #49
Damn....we were having a nice conversation and then you go attack me. jessie04 Sep 2013 #50
And you dont care too...for everything that I see...yes you care, but Sand Wind Sep 2013 #36
I'm calling for us not to start bombing Syrian cities and killing Syrian people. another_liberal Sep 2013 #41
What did the human race agree on for civilians at the Geneva Conventions? blm Sep 2013 #56
Can you be more precise? another_liberal Sep 2013 #57
Where were you? karynnj Sep 2013 #21
Cute question. First, I am not the one howling for bombing after 100,000 died while I typed Bluenorthwest Sep 2013 #45
Then you must know the answer to this: Who is the US lawmaker blm Sep 2013 #58
We are not the world's policemen. It is not our place to unilaterally take out his delivery systems. totodeinhere Sep 2013 #31
Oh there is alot we can do. jessie04 Sep 2013 #34
What you described is not a limited strike by any stretch of the imagination. totodeinhere Sep 2013 #35
Sure it is. jessie04 Sep 2013 #42
You may not care about what the MIC is doing to our country, but many of us do. n/t totodeinhere Sep 2013 #47
I appreciate your honesty and sincereity. nt jessie04 Sep 2013 #51
Thank you for your civility as well. We need more of that here. n/t totodeinhere Sep 2013 #60
You must be crazy. John2 Sep 2013 #48
WOw. jessie04 Sep 2013 #54
Is this pacifism? (Warning: Live Execution by Anti-Assad Insurgents) David__77 Sep 2013 #11
We need UN intervention! Not a unilateral intervention by POTUS or CONGRESS. Rebellious Republican Sep 2013 #18
What says the UN is getting involved? karynnj Sep 2013 #23
It takes big voices to get the UN involved, this is one very big voice. Rebellious Republican Sep 2013 #28
Dont hold your breath. jessie04 Sep 2013 #26
While I will not hold my breath, I hold out hope that the UN gets involved. Rebellious Republican Sep 2013 #30
Obviously yes they should do something. nt jessie04 Sep 2013 #32
Yeah, only cruise missiles can bring peace to Syria. another_liberal Sep 2013 #19
That may or not be. There has been a lot of contradictory intelligence about this. totodeinhere Sep 2013 #7
Good point!! n/t spartan61 Sep 2013 #10
They didn't order gas attacks against their own people daleo Sep 2013 #12
No . . . another_liberal Sep 2013 #22
maybe the EU will take the lead on an International tribunal of Assad. Sunlei Sep 2013 #17
My initial reaction to this "news" is "so what"? seabeckind Sep 2013 #24
They must not listen to Rush Limbaugh in Europe JohnnyRingo Sep 2013 #33
EU also says wait at least for the UN inspector's report before attacking Syria soundsgreat Sep 2013 #37
The thing is..I don't see any, any upside to Assad gassing.... Bonhomme Richard Sep 2013 #40
Well said . . . another_liberal Sep 2013 #44
The current disastrous state of Syria is largely the result of Assad's idiotic choices bhikkhu Sep 2013 #46
Says who, the Saudis or Qatar? John2 Sep 2013 #52
WHAT?!?! iamthebandfanman Sep 2013 #55
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»EU agrees that all indica...»Reply #5