Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Ace Acme

(1,464 posts)
72. So a carrier, impractical for real warfare as it is, is an enormous profit opportunity
Mon Nov 11, 2013, 07:05 PM
Nov 2013

Last edited Mon Nov 11, 2013, 08:07 PM - Edit history (1)

... for the military industrial complex because its mere existence creates the need for a vast fleet of protective infrastructure.

OK, maybe I'll refine my position. Maybe, properly accessorized with $30 billion worth of support infrastructure, a carrier can be of military utility in an actual war.

Are they of any military utility in national defense? Can they do anything to defend our borders that land-based forces can not do? Or are they only of use in projecting force in places in the world where we are not wanted?






They are making a big deal about this in my neck of the woods. longship Nov 2013 #1
If someone mentions it,....say, "Pardon?" Spitfire of ATJ Nov 2013 #5
Bad Spitfire! Very bad! longship Nov 2013 #6
All that is fine and good - but when will the USS William Clinton be commissioned? TheDebbieDee Nov 2013 #2
I hope there will be a garbage scowl that will be approprately christened as George W. Bush Buddha_of_Wisdom Nov 2013 #3
Make the GW Bush ship out of wood adieu Nov 2013 #11
They would build an AC carrier and name it after him OnlinePoker Nov 2013 #16
They only name carriers... awoke_in_2003 Nov 2013 #18
There's the USS Jimmy Carter from a few years ago Recursion Nov 2013 #32
Reagan stayed stateside during WWII making military training films. Lasher Nov 2013 #69
The next ship will be the USS John F Kennedy (CVN 79). Nt hack89 Nov 2013 #37
I did not know that...thanks. nt awoke_in_2003 Nov 2013 #40
USS John F. Kennedy (CV-67) was decommissioned in 2007. Lasher Nov 2013 #70
JFK endorsed a UN proposal for total disarmament in 9/61 Ace Acme Nov 2013 #73
Sometime around Kelvin Mace Nov 2013 #21
No, but you can bet there will be a USS George W. Bush. It will probably sink. olddad56 Nov 2013 #22
One can only hope it will sink...... TheDebbieDee Nov 2013 #23
If there was a hint of justice... jmowreader Nov 2013 #64
Nothing but a giant machine designed to kill people tinrobot Nov 2013 #4
We should scrap every ship in the US Navy. The Coast Guard is enough to defend us. Bob Jones Nov 2013 #7
There may be a reason you do not worry about amphibious landings, other wise you would not have Rebellious Republican Nov 2013 #8
We currently have 10 sulphurdunn Nov 2013 #35
Is there any conceivable military utility to these carriers in an actual war? Ace Acme Nov 2013 #42
Carriers operate as part of a battle group jmowreader Nov 2013 #65
If recent history is any guide, a carrier would be vulnerable to unarmed airliners Ace Acme Nov 2013 #67
If recent history is any guide, so is a skyscraper jmowreader Nov 2013 #68
Nonsense caraher Nov 2013 #71
So a carrier, impractical for real warfare as it is, is an enormous profit opportunity Ace Acme Nov 2013 #72
Overruns? No problem. RandySF Nov 2013 #9
The Pentagon is not into saving . . . another_liberal Nov 2013 #25
Unlike the last president a carrier was named for, Ford was a carrier sailor jmowreader Nov 2013 #10
Save people, when it is easier to just kill them in the first place? RC Nov 2013 #53
The two hospital ships we have already are used to save people jmowreader Nov 2013 #61
Next generation? You mean there is going to be more of these things?? GreydeeThos Nov 2013 #12
Hey, we have only eleven aircraft-carrier strike task forces at present, and that's not even two indepat Nov 2013 #15
Put it up to eleven! Bosso 63 Nov 2013 #27
Safe not only from Terra warrant46 Nov 2013 #59
How many NEW schools and Hospitals penndragon69 Nov 2013 #13
High speed rail, even. pangaia Nov 2013 #39
Eisenhower's "Cross of Iron" Speech: Ace Acme Nov 2013 #43
Sickening and repulsive waste of money Glorfindel Nov 2013 #14
hardly, and you know better pasto76 Nov 2013 #20
Carriers are sitting ducks, helpless Ace Acme Nov 2013 #44
That's why carriers only travel in carrier groups Recursion Nov 2013 #49
The necessity of an entourage only underscores the carrier's vulnerability nt Ace Acme Nov 2013 #51
The military doesn't understand this: lastlib Nov 2013 #17
50 Years later, we're still ignoring Ike's warning! LongTomH Nov 2013 #54
They understand, they just don't care mwrguy Nov 2013 #66
halfway down the slip... awoke_in_2003 Nov 2013 #19
OMG someone named a ship after Ford. It's going to crash into all the other carriers and pam4water Nov 2013 #24
We'll show those Soviets who's boss! IDemo Nov 2013 #26
All for a guy that was selected and not elected... Historic NY Nov 2013 #28
JFK is getting a ship in this class Recursion Nov 2013 #34
JFK endorsed a UN proposal for total disarmament Ace Acme Nov 2013 #45
He was also a WWII Navy combat veteran. Nt hack89 Nov 2013 #38
Freakin' Lasers!! I hope it doesn't shoot lasers like Pres.Ford played golf underpants Nov 2013 #29
Ah, a mother ship for drones. nt bemildred Nov 2013 #30
I can't wait until they christen the USS Barack Hussein Obama jpak Nov 2013 #31
The Death Star will be named for Obama nt Ace Acme Nov 2013 #46
For those curious, here's the count of ships named for each President Recursion Nov 2013 #33
Sheesh...nothing for Millard Fillmore. Historic NY Nov 2013 #36
Or my state's own Herbert Hoover Sognefjord Nov 2013 #56
Surprised they had the nerve to name one for Grant Ace Acme Nov 2013 #47
He never benefited from it, his poor judgement to Historic NY Nov 2013 #55
He never benefited from making his supporters very, very grateful? I see. nt Ace Acme Nov 2013 #62
Just wanted to see it.. yuiyoshida Nov 2013 #41
It looks good sakabatou Nov 2013 #48
un.. yuiyoshida Nov 2013 #50
Sou da sakabatou Nov 2013 #52
Global military expenditures sulphurdunn Nov 2013 #57
It cost 12 billion dollars locks Nov 2013 #58
Should we call it the Ford? Tabasco_Dave Nov 2013 #60
Call it the Edsel. Ace Acme Nov 2013 #63
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Navy christens next gener...»Reply #72