Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Canada Supreme Court Strikes Down All Current Restrictions on Prostitution [View all]Kurska
(5,739 posts)79. Honestly, I meant to say relegate to the shadow, I was rather tired from a long day.
I do want to see regulation and for some reason the countless times I've said that to you has left you unconvinced.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
122 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Canada Supreme Court Strikes Down All Current Restrictions on Prostitution [View all]
Hissyspit
Dec 2013
OP
My hit on it is that they want a rational regulated system. Start from scratch come next year
Tom Rinaldo
Dec 2013
#33
Well, there's also the "prostitution inevitably leads to trafficking" argument
Recursion
Dec 2013
#6
So with unionization, how do you address seniority rights in an industry when a consumer
24601
Dec 2013
#90
I don't think allowing prostitutes to hire bodyguards is going to dramatically increase harm
NoOneMan
Dec 2013
#55
Congrats, Canada, on your status as a sanctuary for pimps and sex traffickers.
geek tragedy
Dec 2013
#13
Yes I read the article. Pimping is legal in Canada now. So is recruiting women for prostitution.
geek tragedy
Dec 2013
#15
Oh dear, we must protect our fragile womenfolk from being recruited by these sly men
NoOneMan
Dec 2013
#17
The study you cited has nothing to do with legal sex-workers getting more rights to protection
NoOneMan
Dec 2013
#68
It does have to do with the safety of sex workers in general, and the deterioration of that safety
Squinch
Dec 2013
#69
You do understand prostitution was already legal? Now they may get to hire bodyguards and drivers
NoOneMan
Dec 2013
#70
Some aspects of prostitution were legal. Other aspects were not. The possibility as a result of
Squinch
Dec 2013
#71
No. Prostitution was legal. A prostitute hiring a guard was illegal. A prostitute having a safe...
NoOneMan
Dec 2013
#72
"“These appeals and the cross-appeals are not about whether prostitution should be legal or not.
Hissyspit
Dec 2013
#19
one-sided? they were wrong becaues they didn't provide the "pimps are great" perspective? nt
geek tragedy
Dec 2013
#50
Are you even trying to form an intelligent argument at this point, or do you honestly
geek tragedy
Dec 2013
#76
Yes, you're inventing a fantasy world where prostitution is just like any other
geek tragedy
Dec 2013
#47
One doesn't buy sex. Sex is an act, not a product. The woman's body is the product.
Squinch
Dec 2013
#83
No. You buy the body for the period of time you use it. You may or may not choose to have
Squinch
Dec 2013
#85
Well, that's the male entitlement view of things. Defend the pigs if you must.
geek tragedy
Dec 2013
#87
I know some girls and guys who rather like the idea of being whipped for someone's enjoyment.
Kurska
Dec 2013
#96
But as has been argued here often, it often is not consenting adults, and the buyers don't
Squinch
Dec 2013
#102
Tell me, do you really think legalization would lead to more trafficking and sexual slavery?
Kurska
Dec 2013
#105
Gee, you think maybe that REPORTED trafficking increases because of increased visibility?
Kurska
Dec 2013
#119
Yes, I did read it. And their conclusion was that the net effect is a "larger reported
Squinch
Dec 2013
#122
It seems to me you think that nobody has the right to be tortured, even if they want to be.
Kurska
Dec 2013
#111
The length of time that prostitution has existed is often cited, but it really isn't
Squinch
Dec 2013
#101
And does including both pronouns change any of the arguments? As I said, no one is denying
Squinch
Dec 2013
#114
It drastically effects the argument if that argument is prostitution damages women's rights.
Kurska
Dec 2013
#115
My argument, and the argument of the multi-nation studies I have cited, is that legalization
Squinch
Dec 2013
#117
Honestly, I meant to say relegate to the shadow, I was rather tired from a long day.
Kurska
Dec 2013
#79
Funny, the Canadian SC did what you want, ending all regulation of prostitution.
geek tragedy
Dec 2013
#48
You know, I've mentioned I want prostitution to be regulated how many times to you?
Kurska
Dec 2013
#78
You are peddling misandrist bullshit. The vast majority of men don't pay for sex.
geek tragedy
Dec 2013
#88
My lord, apparently thinking both men AND women should be free to sell sex is misogynistic.
Kurska
Dec 2013
#92
"Pimping is legal in Canada now." no actually, you didn't read the article if you believe that n/t
Kurska
Dec 2013
#40
Good. Too many people want to stick their noses into consenting adults' sex lives (nt)
Nye Bevan
Dec 2013
#58
i think its more about others having more fun, honestly if two people come to an agreement
loli phabay
Dec 2013
#107
Here is the Actual Opinion, First it acknowledges that Prostitution is NOT illegal in Canada
happyslug
Dec 2013
#120