Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: German TV: Snowden Says NSA Also Spies on Industry [View all]MADem
(135,425 posts)73. They won't, unfortunately, stop because we say so. Not even if we ask nicely.
PLA Unit 61398 doesn't just spy, for example, they HACK. They'll use deceptive practices to get people to click on links, they'll do the whole malware game, anything they can to get advantage. And the better one is at a foreign language, the more likely one is to get a job in that unit, assuming some computer skills as well.
Pootie's FSB does the same thing. The only difference is, they recruit cyberwhizkids of the Snowden stripe to do their hacking for them, rather than put them through boot camp and in uniform. The result is the same.
It could be because I've lived in countries where spying was part of the landscape, but I've never felt that I had any "guarantee" of privacy on the telephone (you could hear the idiots from SAVAK breathing on the phone in Iran--they'd tap the frigging line with one of those hand held phone thingys that linemen use to check a line and the morons wouldn't take out the little disk from the part where one spoke into the handset). That low expectation translated to the internet for me--I assume some asshole is looking, and for this reason, I keep a low profile in terms of my personal details.
When we go outside our homes (either physically, or virtually) we expose ourselves to surveillance--you can't walk ten steps in downtown NYC without having your picture taken; and nearly as much in any major city. In London, it's more onerous than NYC.
I don't see this reducing, in fact, I see it going the other way as more and more people sign up for "personal surveillance" at the bargain price of twenty nine bucks a month!
It's not just video surveillance (and we all know about face recognition software), we "consent to be tracked" by carrying a cellphone with us. Is this good or bad? If someone is killing their spouse and trying to establish an alibi, those tower pings can "out" a liar. If someone has gone off the road and they're upside-down in a ditch in the freezing cold, those tower pings can save a life. If someone doesn't want the "government" to know what they're up to, they'd better put their cellphone in a lead lined box, or something!
And, if you're the "wrong" nationality in some parts of the world, you'll keep running into the same cab driver or street sweeper, no matter what part of town you find yourself in. Funny how that works! Some people who do that work are better than others--if you can't see your tail, that doesn't necessarily mean you're not being watched! No doubt we put our own HUMINT (hopefully they've gotten a little better than the clodhoppers from the FBI stumbling around mosques trying to sniff out the "suspicious characters" and not blending in at all) on people we have an interest in, as well. It's really not news, it's just that we haven't talked much about this shit (aside from a sustained but --slowly-- lessening indictment of all Muslims in the post-Nahn Wun Wun age) since, ostensibly, the Cold War was declared "Over." I've gotta say, I think we probably need to back that assertion up...it's not "over"--it's just shifted from a military to an economic sphere. He (or she) with the most "customer consumers" wins!
I think people can try to "fight back," I just don't know how much success they'll have, realistically. The willy-nilly collection of data might stop by USA, but the mantle will only be taken up by Russia or China--and if we think they wouldn't have any use for our "domestic" information, I rather doubt that they'd turn it down if they could get at it. Perhaps the solution is a different kind of internet--I've seen some discussions of that here; going the peer-to-peer route, for example, but I'm not tech-savvy enough to jump on any bandwagons that offer that as a solution.
We're living in different times, it's as profound as the period between, say 1910 and 1950, with all the changes those decades brought. The person who was born into a home without central heat, with gas lights if they were lucky, but no electricity, with no radio or telephone, by the time they were forty had all those things, and a motor car and easy access to air travel, to boot. It was a cornucopia of progress that seemed never ending--the sky was the limit. We're living in different (the Chinese would say "interesting" I suspect) times now, and I suspect that our future will be very different from the past. Will this be for better or worse? Hard to know. Time, as it always does, will tell!
Let me apologize for going on and on like this...I don't have any answers (as you can tell by my comments) but I think the discussion is interesting. There will always be a tension between freedom and security, one that is far more complex than old Ben Franklin, who didn't have a laptop or a cellphone, could have ever envisioned.
Pootie's FSB does the same thing. The only difference is, they recruit cyberwhizkids of the Snowden stripe to do their hacking for them, rather than put them through boot camp and in uniform. The result is the same.
It could be because I've lived in countries where spying was part of the landscape, but I've never felt that I had any "guarantee" of privacy on the telephone (you could hear the idiots from SAVAK breathing on the phone in Iran--they'd tap the frigging line with one of those hand held phone thingys that linemen use to check a line and the morons wouldn't take out the little disk from the part where one spoke into the handset). That low expectation translated to the internet for me--I assume some asshole is looking, and for this reason, I keep a low profile in terms of my personal details.
When we go outside our homes (either physically, or virtually) we expose ourselves to surveillance--you can't walk ten steps in downtown NYC without having your picture taken; and nearly as much in any major city. In London, it's more onerous than NYC.
I don't see this reducing, in fact, I see it going the other way as more and more people sign up for "personal surveillance" at the bargain price of twenty nine bucks a month!
It's not just video surveillance (and we all know about face recognition software), we "consent to be tracked" by carrying a cellphone with us. Is this good or bad? If someone is killing their spouse and trying to establish an alibi, those tower pings can "out" a liar. If someone has gone off the road and they're upside-down in a ditch in the freezing cold, those tower pings can save a life. If someone doesn't want the "government" to know what they're up to, they'd better put their cellphone in a lead lined box, or something!
And, if you're the "wrong" nationality in some parts of the world, you'll keep running into the same cab driver or street sweeper, no matter what part of town you find yourself in. Funny how that works! Some people who do that work are better than others--if you can't see your tail, that doesn't necessarily mean you're not being watched! No doubt we put our own HUMINT (hopefully they've gotten a little better than the clodhoppers from the FBI stumbling around mosques trying to sniff out the "suspicious characters" and not blending in at all) on people we have an interest in, as well. It's really not news, it's just that we haven't talked much about this shit (aside from a sustained but --slowly-- lessening indictment of all Muslims in the post-Nahn Wun Wun age) since, ostensibly, the Cold War was declared "Over." I've gotta say, I think we probably need to back that assertion up...it's not "over"--it's just shifted from a military to an economic sphere. He (or she) with the most "customer consumers" wins!
I think people can try to "fight back," I just don't know how much success they'll have, realistically. The willy-nilly collection of data might stop by USA, but the mantle will only be taken up by Russia or China--and if we think they wouldn't have any use for our "domestic" information, I rather doubt that they'd turn it down if they could get at it. Perhaps the solution is a different kind of internet--I've seen some discussions of that here; going the peer-to-peer route, for example, but I'm not tech-savvy enough to jump on any bandwagons that offer that as a solution.
We're living in different times, it's as profound as the period between, say 1910 and 1950, with all the changes those decades brought. The person who was born into a home without central heat, with gas lights if they were lucky, but no electricity, with no radio or telephone, by the time they were forty had all those things, and a motor car and easy access to air travel, to boot. It was a cornucopia of progress that seemed never ending--the sky was the limit. We're living in different (the Chinese would say "interesting" I suspect) times now, and I suspect that our future will be very different from the past. Will this be for better or worse? Hard to know. Time, as it always does, will tell!
Let me apologize for going on and on like this...I don't have any answers (as you can tell by my comments) but I think the discussion is interesting. There will always be a tension between freedom and security, one that is far more complex than old Ben Franklin, who didn't have a laptop or a cellphone, could have ever envisioned.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
131 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
It's important to remember that Greenwald and Poitras have released only a small fraction
Maedhros
Jan 2014
#68
Finally, we are coming around to the dangers of the game we are cheering on...
Demenace
Jan 2014
#18
I'm not following you. Are you saying we should all just shut up about the NSA
Maedhros
Jan 2014
#70
Apparently, what is "wrong" with us is that we don't like omniscient government agencies
Maedhros
Jan 2014
#96
Baldguy, I'll give you this: you'll never let reason or logic rain on your hate parade.
Maedhros
Jan 2014
#118
"You conservatives"? That's just as bad as a Teabagger calling Obama a socialist.
baldguy
Jan 2014
#119
I'm more worried about preserving my personal freedom than Snowden's alleged crimes.
Maedhros
Jan 2014
#120
Continue to attack the messenger. By doing so, you concede the important arguments
Maedhros
Jan 2014
#127
Dude, espionage is illegal anywhere but that exactly is why it is called espionage...
Demenace
Jan 2014
#122
Yeah, he's been proven wrong how many times? The govt has had to admit to what he says, not deny it.
bloomington-lib
Jan 2014
#10
"We are saying this information is not his to expose and that its exposure has far ranging national
mindwalker_i
Jan 2014
#25
You come across like the people who say, a country should balance it books like families do...
Demenace
Jan 2014
#30
Which personal freedom of American citizens is involved with espionage on foreign companies?
Demenace
Jan 2014
#75
There is much more to the NSA's illegal surveillance programs than just industrial espionage.
Maedhros
Jan 2014
#78
Industrial espionage is illegal regardless of how many countries may engage in it.
Maedhros
Jan 2014
#93
Yes. Obviously the role of the NSA is economic imperialism. Snowden's now proven it
riderinthestorm
Jan 2014
#46
The people of the United States did not authorize the NSA to do some of the things it does.
JDPriestly
Jan 2014
#63
The Germans are vacuuming up internet traffic and using it to their adcvantage?
mindwalker_i
Jan 2014
#26
How you missed this story from the same revelation from Snowden is what I am wondering?
Demenace
Jan 2014
#35
Again, the difference between the Germans and most other citizens of all of these nations and us...
Demenace
Jan 2014
#41
The world does work that way--it's why no one is getting terribly excited about all this,
MADem
Jan 2014
#50
Your Opinion Is Just That - An Opinion - There Are No Facts To Support Your Opinion
cantbeserious
Jan 2014
#52
Snowden Has Evidence - We Do Not - For Snowden It Is Not Opinion - For All Others - Opinion Prevails
cantbeserious
Jan 2014
#88
"I was told of instances in history when people have gladly cheered their own destruction"
mindwalker_i
Jan 2014
#27
You think that because SCOTUS (and the legislative and executive branches)
riderinthestorm
Jan 2014
#48
You know this watchdog is not the Supreme court and that its opinion is about...
Demenace
Jan 2014
#97
The Supreme Court Gave Us Citizens United - It Is Not To Be Trusted In Any Matter - My opinion
cantbeserious
Jan 2014
#106
So because he has comforted and aided the enemy, in this case including US Citizens
MyNameGoesHere
Jan 2014
#69
Perhaps the NSA is just engaged in economic spying so it can make good investments ...
spin
Jan 2014
#66
Here we have the scumbag Snowden who probably have a big clue form some source
Thinkingabout
Jan 2014
#82