Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Private pain: Dell layoff bloodbath to hit over 15,000 staffers – insiders [View all]Xithras
(16,191 posts)40. Much of that is limitations based on the input format.
The user interface is clunky and not very intuitive.
The user interface is elegant and easy to use if you have a touchscreen. It sucks otherwise.
Many of the familiar functions are missing or are hard to get to from the home screen.
The home screen is the Start menu. You are limited to accessing Start menu items from that screen because of it. The desktop is one touch away...if you have a touchscreen. It sucks otherwise.
It's program backward comparability is bad.
Only for XP users, who make up a minority of Windows users. Nearly all programs and hardware designed for Vista or 7 work fine on 8. I genuinely can't fault Microsoft for not maintaining compatibility with a 12 year old dinosaur operating system that is now three versions out of date. You have to let go at some point.
It's app based start menu adds unnecessary steps to access programs.
This is an argument that I hear a lot and never quite grasped. If you have the icon on your Start screen, you can click that icon and open the program with a single click. If you don't have it bound, you just click the Apps button to view all the apps, and then click the application to open it. So that method has two clicks. That SAME action on XP generally takes FOUR clicks (Start>Programs>TheApplicationFolder>TheApplicationLink). Opening programs on 8 is actually much faster than previous versions of Windows. This one is even better with a touchscreen, but is still quicker even with a mouse.
It is a hybrid OS that attempts to bridge the gap between tablets and PCs and does neither successfully. It should be one or the other.
Microsoft really made the mistake of believing that all PC's would have touchscreens in no time. It was a dumb thing to assume. Few people are willing to change their screens just to upgrade their operating system, and most new PC purchasers still see touchscreens as a luxury item. Windows 8 actually runs incredibly well on a touch device so Win8 touch users generally like the operating system, but Microsoft assumed that mouse and keyboard users would only comprise a small portion of their legacy users, and included mouse support almost as an afterthought. That decision is really the biggest single failing in Windows 8, and it's one that I don't see them fixing anytime soon. Touchscreen desktop users only comprise a small percentage of Windows 8 users, which means that most Win8 users are struggling with mice and are unhappy with it. In the long term, that may go down as the decision that killed Windows.
The user interface is elegant and easy to use if you have a touchscreen. It sucks otherwise.
Many of the familiar functions are missing or are hard to get to from the home screen.
The home screen is the Start menu. You are limited to accessing Start menu items from that screen because of it. The desktop is one touch away...if you have a touchscreen. It sucks otherwise.
It's program backward comparability is bad.
Only for XP users, who make up a minority of Windows users. Nearly all programs and hardware designed for Vista or 7 work fine on 8. I genuinely can't fault Microsoft for not maintaining compatibility with a 12 year old dinosaur operating system that is now three versions out of date. You have to let go at some point.
It's app based start menu adds unnecessary steps to access programs.
This is an argument that I hear a lot and never quite grasped. If you have the icon on your Start screen, you can click that icon and open the program with a single click. If you don't have it bound, you just click the Apps button to view all the apps, and then click the application to open it. So that method has two clicks. That SAME action on XP generally takes FOUR clicks (Start>Programs>TheApplicationFolder>TheApplicationLink). Opening programs on 8 is actually much faster than previous versions of Windows. This one is even better with a touchscreen, but is still quicker even with a mouse.
It is a hybrid OS that attempts to bridge the gap between tablets and PCs and does neither successfully. It should be one or the other.
Microsoft really made the mistake of believing that all PC's would have touchscreens in no time. It was a dumb thing to assume. Few people are willing to change their screens just to upgrade their operating system, and most new PC purchasers still see touchscreens as a luxury item. Windows 8 actually runs incredibly well on a touch device so Win8 touch users generally like the operating system, but Microsoft assumed that mouse and keyboard users would only comprise a small portion of their legacy users, and included mouse support almost as an afterthought. That decision is really the biggest single failing in Windows 8, and it's one that I don't see them fixing anytime soon. Touchscreen desktop users only comprise a small percentage of Windows 8 users, which means that most Win8 users are struggling with mice and are unhappy with it. In the long term, that may go down as the decision that killed Windows.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
40 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Private pain: Dell layoff bloodbath to hit over 15,000 staffers – insiders [View all]
Redfairen
Feb 2014
OP
I hope that means the 14,999 workers will come from the Indian outsourcing. nt
kelliekat44
Feb 2014
#37
I have a friend who works for them, first job he could get after almost a year
CBGLuthier
Feb 2014
#2
We just bought a new PC laptop (just got a new MacBook last month---we need one of each)
Heddi
Feb 2014
#31
I have Windows 8, and a degree in computers, along with certifications. Funny my Win 8
A Simple Game
Feb 2014
#33
"Pull yourselves up by your own freaking bootstraps. Sneer." - Republicons (R - 1%)
Berlum
Feb 2014
#10
"worldwide layoff number" Roundrock home office it's 15%, still painfull of course.
Sunlei
Feb 2014
#13
I noticed that the large Fortune 500 company I work for is replacing Dells with HPs
tammywammy
Feb 2014
#24
Start getting rid of the jobs, before you start getting rid of the people.
blkmusclmachine
Feb 2014
#36