Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kenfrequed

(7,865 posts)
26. While...
Sun Mar 18, 2012, 07:23 PM
Mar 2012

I might not agree with the football quarterback/sniper analogy, I think my point stands. He would almost be more useful to our side if he were a republican that constantly sold out their positions and adopted liberal language and policy positions to 'win elections.'

I won't bother with an analogy and most of what I wrote is backed up by primary and secondary sources discussing the way that Rahm plays the game of politics. He is never there for the progressive side of the party and does his level best to shut us out of positions repeatedly. He was a terrible choice as Chief of Staff and if Suskind's book is to be believed then it is quite possible that had he not managed to slide into the race for Mayor of Chicago then he might have ended up being booted from his lofty perch for alienating too many people.

He seems to have few principles or ideals.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Rahm is dead right except cosmicone Mar 2012 #1
Rahm, if you can't do anything less corrupt than a Republican, shut the fuck up. yurbud Mar 2012 #2
The question CAPHAVOC Mar 2012 #10
yep, do you vote for the crook who promises to be a crook on ideological grounds or yurbud Mar 2012 #15
Leave Mitt Alone! Son of Gob Mar 2012 #21
His spine is just fine Cosmocat Mar 2012 #9
I love it when right wingers fight nt msongs Mar 2012 #3
Yep! patricia92243 Mar 2012 #28
What the hell is Rahm's problem with Russia? MattSh Mar 2012 #4
I have a vision of Putin driving his car excuse not to write Mar 2012 #5
Did Rahm himself mention Russia? Better to mention: Romney's Bain Capital backs Limbuagh Brettongarcia Mar 2012 #6
This message was self-deleted by its author eomer Mar 2012 #7
Isn't this cute... he thinks he's relevant. n/t Fearless Mar 2012 #8
this idea has to be pushed. samsingh Mar 2012 #11
Silly comparison SHRED Mar 2012 #12
Rahm to Romney. Rush to Russia. Iggo Mar 2012 #13
Like Rahm Emanuel is famous for standing up to right wingers tularetom Mar 2012 #14
I'm sure Whale shit serves a function kenfrequed Mar 2012 #20
even calling him a tactician is too kind. He is more like a bag man yurbud Mar 2012 #22
Hmm... kenfrequed Mar 2012 #23
by that logic, he is like a quarterback who throws the ball to someone on the other team yurbud Mar 2012 #24
You make a number extreme assumptions and discount the value of pragmatism Julian Englis Mar 2012 #25
While... kenfrequed Mar 2012 #26
pragmatism implies that it is in service of some higher good yurbud Mar 2012 #27
I half agree... kenfrequed Mar 2012 #30
Washington has an odd definition of ''tough guy'': stomping on those with less money and power yurbud Mar 2012 #31
WTF? "Stand up to Russia?" Crazy talk... David__77 Mar 2012 #16
I have a kinda dirty taste in my mouth recing that, but it's a good line. :) joshcryer Mar 2012 #17
I just like the fact he is pointing out Romney is spineless Julian Englis Mar 2012 #18
Republicans are spineless lovuian Mar 2012 #19
Who is that man KamaAina Mar 2012 #29
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Rahm Emanuel to Romney: ‘...»Reply #26