Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

jtuck004

(15,882 posts)

3. "they say Connecticut's health exchange does not offer any policies that exclude abortion coverage."

Reply to VMA131Marine (Original post)

Tue May 6, 2014, 07:08 PM

May 2014

If that is true, it is interesting that the insurance market doesn't see it as cost effective to offer one without it.

Because if the thieving bastards at health insurance cos thought they could stick a nickel in their pocket even if it killed someone they would.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

23 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

"Couple Sues Over Abortion Coverage In Access Health CT Plans" [View all] VMA131Marine May 2014 OP

Considering the state of our courts, they may win. liberal N proud May 2014 #1

Agree. n/t LeftOfWest May 2014 #13

let 'em mercuryblues May 2014 #2

"they say Connecticut's health exchange does not offer any policies that exclude abortion coverage." jtuck004 May 2014 #3

Why should they worry about it? Are they planning on needing it? ebbie15644 May 2014 #4

Um, abortion is legal and constitutional. JaneyVee May 2014 #5

A stupid, frivolous lawsuit. Let's hope it doesn't make it to the stupid, frivolous 5 SC justices. mountain grammy May 2014 #6

Oh it probably will go to the SCOTUS and they'll rule in their favor .. FASCISM marches on. YOHABLO May 2014 #7

In class today, we were discussing this general topic enlightenment May 2014 #8

Can I sue to prevent Viagra and Cialis coverage? dballance May 2014 #9

We're they covered by policies before the ACA that covered birth control and abortions? Did it lostincalifornia May 2014 #10

Stop forcing tax payers to subsidize churches. Tax them. Dawson Leery May 2014 #11

+100000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 SunSeeker May 2014 #12

yes, 100% correct!! mountain grammy May 2014 #14

WTF Skittles May 2014 #15

Can a Jehavoh's witness sue to exclude blood transfusion coverage? If not, then these guys have no McCamy Taylor May 2014 #16

Do they think because xxqqqzme May 2014 #17

If you are not planning on having an abortion...... Acornsouth May 2014 #18

These morons don't think that way liberal N proud May 2014 #19

So go to a private broker for a customized plan and pay $1,200 a month. Idiots. Vinca May 2014 #20

IF it becomes medically necessary to save Abbie with an abortion Omaha Steve May 2014 #21

I will not support any law mandating that Abbie Bracy get an abortion. n/t Orsino May 2014 #22

And where would you find such a law? nt Ilsa May 2014 #23