Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
24. Clearly, the prosecutor was well-prepared on that point:
Tue May 20, 2014, 11:15 AM
May 2014
Choi called McMillan's claim that Bovell had grabbed her "absolutely offensive" and "physically impossible," and said it was "absurd how nonsensical that story is." If McMillan was truly grabbed, Choi said, the young woman would have reported it right away. She pointed out that she spoke to a social worker and a psychiatrist in the hospital after she was arrested, and didn't mention the incident to either of them.

"This is not someone who would be too shy to say she was sexually assaulted, if she was sexually assaulted," Choi said.

The prosecution's case had also relied heavily on McMillan's medical records, which did not mention a bruise on her breast and didn't diagnose her as having suffered a seizure in the park (bystanders saw McMillan having what looked like a seizure; she testified during the trial that her doctors told her they wouldn't be able to diagnose a seizure after the fact). Choi said the seizure was a fake, calling it "the performance of a lifetime." (She also implied, but did not say outright, that McMillan had also faked breathing problems after she was arrested in December of 2013 in an unrelated misdemeanor. We have obtained a copy of the complaint in that case. It doesn't say how McMillan was taken into custody or whether she complained of breathing issues.)

McMillan also told one doctor shortly after the arrest that she wasn't in serious pain, but told another doctor two days later that her pain was a 10, the worst kind. "This defendant is not reliable and cannot keep her story straight," Choi said. She added that the first time McMillan's bruised breast was noted by a doctor was three days after the incident, when McMillan saw her own doctor at the Institute of Family Health. The prosecutor implied that McMillan had bruised her own breast. For Bovell to have grabbed her hard enough to leave a bruise and scratches, she said, he would have to have "razorblades as fingernails and a hot iron for a hand."

http://blogs.villagevoice.com/runninscared/2014/05/cecily_mcmillan_verdict_occupy_wall_street_protester_erin_choi.php?page=2


It seems that the prosecution was effective in refuting her claims. While I have no interest in defending that particular officer, I think the defense made several tactical errors. It would be foolhardy of them to appeal.


Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Grab their breasts and when they fight back... Charge 'em with assault. The NYPD is Genius 951-Riverside May 2014 #1
And the ones who refuse even video evidence are here BAM in the thread LOL snooper2 May 2014 #5
... Ash_F May 2014 #13
You mean the blurry video? Seen it and still believe her. NutmegYankee May 2014 #15
A pacifist who elbows a cop. Sure. randome May 2014 #43
Pacifists still believe in self defense against sexual assault. NutmegYankee May 2014 #56
This message was self-deleted by its author undiegrinder May 2014 #23
at least she didn't get the book (2-7 years) thrown at her, alp227 May 2014 #2
am so happy for her and her family that her sentence is only 90 days... woot woot! secondwind May 2014 #3
That tit came out of NO WHERE! Officer Bovell's lucky he didn't lose his hand. DRoseDARs May 2014 #4
Given the video, she got a very good result. nt msanthrope May 2014 #6
You mean the video where the officer clearly had his hand between her armpit and over her breast? Ash_F May 2014 #12
Here..where she hits the cop...it's what turned the jury, apparently... msanthrope May 2014 #16
In that same video you can see he has his hand between her armpit BEFORE she elbowed him. Ash_F May 2014 #17
You mean where she cross checked the cop? Look...I'm not defending the officer...I'm pointing out msanthrope May 2014 #18
If someone is sexually assaulted, they THEN have the right to defend themselves. Ash_F May 2014 #19
But the video did not support her claim of being sexually assaulted, and then hitting the cop per msanthrope May 2014 #21
Video clearly shows his right hand going between her armpit from behind and over her breast. Ash_F May 2014 #22
Clearly, the prosecutor was well-prepared on that point: msanthrope May 2014 #24
The judge made an error in barring the officer's character. A willful error. Ash_F May 2014 #25
The ticketing scandal was brought in....and sucessfully parried by the prosecutor. msanthrope May 2014 #27
Yeah leaving a sexual predator on the streets is not abusing his discretion. Ash_F May 2014 #29
Well, if McMillian wishes to file an excessive force/sexual misconduct complaint, she is welcome to msanthrope May 2014 #31
Indeed, the justice system failed at every level in this case. Ash_F May 2014 #33
One could argue that the failure is that a white, intellectual woman with financial backing, msanthrope May 2014 #37
Your defense of this brutal sexual assault is noted Ash_F May 2014 #38
Well, aren't you asking two questions there? msanthrope May 2014 #39
Squeezing it to the point of bruising isn't? Ash_F May 2014 #44
It does seem that the jury in this case did not find that claim credible. I don't know if they msanthrope May 2014 #45
And it is clear that most of them regret it. Ash_F May 2014 #47
Well...I don't think they regret the verdict....merely a possible sentence. But she got a very good msanthrope May 2014 #48
They said they were appealing. Ash_F May 2014 #49
Yeah..let me know when they actually have an attorney, and when that attorney has made msanthrope May 2014 #50
That was her attorney. Ash_F May 2014 #51
Her appellate attorney. When they hire one of those, then an appeal is actually in the offing. nt msanthrope May 2014 #52
I just looked up the appeals court and it is 3 Dems, 4 pubs Ash_F May 2014 #53
Wait a minute - when you accuse someone of a crime, including sexual assault, aren't they also 24601 May 2014 #65
The jury did not receive all of the facts Ash_F May 2014 #66
The cop has not been tried by a jury - only trial by DU accusation. No jury has judged him guilty. 24601 May 2014 #68
It's going to appeals. Ash_F May 2014 #70
A case that hasn't been tried isn't going to be appealed. I judge it matters not who appointed 24601 May 2014 #71
That's adorable. Ash_F May 2014 #72
I could understand differing with a jury treestar May 2014 #60
Squeezing someones breast to the point of bruising is more than worthy of that. Ash_F May 2014 #63
Looks like there is some question of whether the cop caused that bruising. treestar May 2014 #75
I direct you to read the subthread and links found therein Ash_F May 2014 #80
She may have hit the cop simply to hit the cop... randys1 May 2014 #26
She was drunk. She also claims she can't recall hitting the cop. msanthrope May 2014 #32
Yeah, lucky, and while Bush and Cheney roam free, injustice is everywhere randys1 May 2014 #34
The fact is, if a crime were perpetrated against you, would you be satisfied with the defendant msanthrope May 2014 #36
No, you just made my point though, didnt you! randys1 May 2014 #40
Apparently treestar May 2014 #62
As it the guy who ordered a drone strike on a US Citizen. Are you willing to throw him under the 24601 May 2014 #67
absurd comparison randys1 May 2014 #69
And it was up to the jury treestar May 2014 #59
You've got it....the jury is the fact-finder here. nt msanthrope May 2014 #61
I heard she was just standing her ground. blkmusclmachine May 2014 #7
the cop was in plain clothes warrprayer May 2014 #8
In plain clothes, and approaching from behind, where she couldn't see him Mister Ed May 2014 #57
So if I see a woman grabbed from behind by some guy in street clothes christx30 May 2014 #79
None of those cops should have been there in the first place. Hissyspit May 2014 #9
If you stand for justice in America, you are targeted, beaten and thrown away like trash randys1 May 2014 #35
And yet the Budny fucktwits train their guns on Federal Agents. Fantastic Anarchist May 2014 #41
Yes, no justice in America, very rare anyway randys1 May 2014 #42
Federal Law enforcement is saturated with people who think just like Bundy Ash_F May 2014 #46
It's good to see the pro sexual assault Duers are here BAM right on time! /nt Ash_F May 2014 #10
Excerpt from her legal team's response. Ash_F May 2014 #11
FIVE YEARS PROBATION JackRiddler May 2014 #14
Not to mention that the Felony conviction... NutmegYankee May 2014 #20
With the busted blood vessels she had on her chest and the way that cop Jamastiene May 2014 #28
she needs a full pardon! That police thug grabbed her breast HARD, from behind. She had a right t Sunlei May 2014 #30
The jury did not agree treestar May 2014 #58
And the Zimmerman jury found him not guilty. NutmegYankee May 2014 #64
+1 n/t NealK May 2014 #73
Not every time we disagree with them treestar May 2014 #74
it should be time served at worst. yurbud May 2014 #54
Can she go back and charge the cop for sexual assault or sue the Police Department? yurbud May 2014 #55
This was not an attempt at keeping the peace, nilesobek May 2014 #76
90 days seems fair Niceguy1 May 2014 #77
A good summary of the case and the defendant here BeyondGeography May 2014 #78
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Occupy Wall Street protes...»Reply #24