Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
50. Yeah..let me know when they actually have an attorney, and when that attorney has made
Tue May 20, 2014, 03:51 PM
May 2014

a bail pending appeal motion. Principles aside, I think it would be malpractice to tell a client to give up a 90-day sentence on this.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Grab their breasts and when they fight back... Charge 'em with assault. The NYPD is Genius 951-Riverside May 2014 #1
And the ones who refuse even video evidence are here BAM in the thread LOL snooper2 May 2014 #5
... Ash_F May 2014 #13
You mean the blurry video? Seen it and still believe her. NutmegYankee May 2014 #15
A pacifist who elbows a cop. Sure. randome May 2014 #43
Pacifists still believe in self defense against sexual assault. NutmegYankee May 2014 #56
This message was self-deleted by its author undiegrinder May 2014 #23
at least she didn't get the book (2-7 years) thrown at her, alp227 May 2014 #2
am so happy for her and her family that her sentence is only 90 days... woot woot! secondwind May 2014 #3
That tit came out of NO WHERE! Officer Bovell's lucky he didn't lose his hand. DRoseDARs May 2014 #4
Given the video, she got a very good result. nt msanthrope May 2014 #6
You mean the video where the officer clearly had his hand between her armpit and over her breast? Ash_F May 2014 #12
Here..where she hits the cop...it's what turned the jury, apparently... msanthrope May 2014 #16
In that same video you can see he has his hand between her armpit BEFORE she elbowed him. Ash_F May 2014 #17
You mean where she cross checked the cop? Look...I'm not defending the officer...I'm pointing out msanthrope May 2014 #18
If someone is sexually assaulted, they THEN have the right to defend themselves. Ash_F May 2014 #19
But the video did not support her claim of being sexually assaulted, and then hitting the cop per msanthrope May 2014 #21
Video clearly shows his right hand going between her armpit from behind and over her breast. Ash_F May 2014 #22
Clearly, the prosecutor was well-prepared on that point: msanthrope May 2014 #24
The judge made an error in barring the officer's character. A willful error. Ash_F May 2014 #25
The ticketing scandal was brought in....and sucessfully parried by the prosecutor. msanthrope May 2014 #27
Yeah leaving a sexual predator on the streets is not abusing his discretion. Ash_F May 2014 #29
Well, if McMillian wishes to file an excessive force/sexual misconduct complaint, she is welcome to msanthrope May 2014 #31
Indeed, the justice system failed at every level in this case. Ash_F May 2014 #33
One could argue that the failure is that a white, intellectual woman with financial backing, msanthrope May 2014 #37
Your defense of this brutal sexual assault is noted Ash_F May 2014 #38
Well, aren't you asking two questions there? msanthrope May 2014 #39
Squeezing it to the point of bruising isn't? Ash_F May 2014 #44
It does seem that the jury in this case did not find that claim credible. I don't know if they msanthrope May 2014 #45
And it is clear that most of them regret it. Ash_F May 2014 #47
Well...I don't think they regret the verdict....merely a possible sentence. But she got a very good msanthrope May 2014 #48
They said they were appealing. Ash_F May 2014 #49
Yeah..let me know when they actually have an attorney, and when that attorney has made msanthrope May 2014 #50
That was her attorney. Ash_F May 2014 #51
Her appellate attorney. When they hire one of those, then an appeal is actually in the offing. nt msanthrope May 2014 #52
I just looked up the appeals court and it is 3 Dems, 4 pubs Ash_F May 2014 #53
Wait a minute - when you accuse someone of a crime, including sexual assault, aren't they also 24601 May 2014 #65
The jury did not receive all of the facts Ash_F May 2014 #66
The cop has not been tried by a jury - only trial by DU accusation. No jury has judged him guilty. 24601 May 2014 #68
It's going to appeals. Ash_F May 2014 #70
A case that hasn't been tried isn't going to be appealed. I judge it matters not who appointed 24601 May 2014 #71
That's adorable. Ash_F May 2014 #72
I could understand differing with a jury treestar May 2014 #60
Squeezing someones breast to the point of bruising is more than worthy of that. Ash_F May 2014 #63
Looks like there is some question of whether the cop caused that bruising. treestar May 2014 #75
I direct you to read the subthread and links found therein Ash_F May 2014 #80
She may have hit the cop simply to hit the cop... randys1 May 2014 #26
She was drunk. She also claims she can't recall hitting the cop. msanthrope May 2014 #32
Yeah, lucky, and while Bush and Cheney roam free, injustice is everywhere randys1 May 2014 #34
The fact is, if a crime were perpetrated against you, would you be satisfied with the defendant msanthrope May 2014 #36
No, you just made my point though, didnt you! randys1 May 2014 #40
Apparently treestar May 2014 #62
As it the guy who ordered a drone strike on a US Citizen. Are you willing to throw him under the 24601 May 2014 #67
absurd comparison randys1 May 2014 #69
And it was up to the jury treestar May 2014 #59
You've got it....the jury is the fact-finder here. nt msanthrope May 2014 #61
I heard she was just standing her ground. blkmusclmachine May 2014 #7
the cop was in plain clothes warrprayer May 2014 #8
In plain clothes, and approaching from behind, where she couldn't see him Mister Ed May 2014 #57
So if I see a woman grabbed from behind by some guy in street clothes christx30 May 2014 #79
None of those cops should have been there in the first place. Hissyspit May 2014 #9
If you stand for justice in America, you are targeted, beaten and thrown away like trash randys1 May 2014 #35
And yet the Budny fucktwits train their guns on Federal Agents. Fantastic Anarchist May 2014 #41
Yes, no justice in America, very rare anyway randys1 May 2014 #42
Federal Law enforcement is saturated with people who think just like Bundy Ash_F May 2014 #46
It's good to see the pro sexual assault Duers are here BAM right on time! /nt Ash_F May 2014 #10
Excerpt from her legal team's response. Ash_F May 2014 #11
FIVE YEARS PROBATION JackRiddler May 2014 #14
Not to mention that the Felony conviction... NutmegYankee May 2014 #20
With the busted blood vessels she had on her chest and the way that cop Jamastiene May 2014 #28
she needs a full pardon! That police thug grabbed her breast HARD, from behind. She had a right t Sunlei May 2014 #30
The jury did not agree treestar May 2014 #58
And the Zimmerman jury found him not guilty. NutmegYankee May 2014 #64
+1 n/t NealK May 2014 #73
Not every time we disagree with them treestar May 2014 #74
it should be time served at worst. yurbud May 2014 #54
Can she go back and charge the cop for sexual assault or sue the Police Department? yurbud May 2014 #55
This was not an attempt at keeping the peace, nilesobek May 2014 #76
90 days seems fair Niceguy1 May 2014 #77
A good summary of the case and the defendant here BeyondGeography May 2014 #78
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Occupy Wall Street protes...»Reply #50