Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Sounding snippish with Terry Gross is unfortunate. peacebird Jun 2014 #1
that is the real Hilary. ChairmanAgnostic Jun 2014 #13
This is why I don't think she can get elected if she does run. She just isn't Purveyor Jun 2014 #33
Unpleasant Sienna86 Jun 2014 #44
she has to be likable to the barest of majorities heaven05 Jun 2014 #69
Hillary's "likable enough," as Obama would say; she just doesn't know how to relate to people, which makes her a less than an ideal candidate. Gimme Elizabeth! InAbLuEsTaTe Jun 2014 #74
She is, unfortunately, supporting Clinton. nt awoke_in_2003 Jun 2014 #84
Supporting Hillary in running is not mutually exclusive to her running as well. All she said is she's not currently running . . . InAbLuEsTaTe Jun 2014 #86
How do you support someone....and then run AGAINST them....that IS mutually exclusive... VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #153
Not at all. You can support someone's running AND believe you are more qualified to run and give people a choice to decide for themselves ... InAbLuEsTaTe Jun 2014 #157
she didn't couch the statement with "running" as you did..... VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #159
Tell that to Obama; he said "NO" to running for President around the same time before the 2008 election as Elizabeth, and we know how that turned out... InAbLuEsTaTe Jun 2014 #162
so when did Barack Obama and Elizabeth Warren become the same person? VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #172
No one's disputing wat Elizabeth said-Im sure she's VERY sure (4 now) she's not running. Notice tho she didn't say "I will NEVER run in 2016". InAbLuEsTaTe Jun 2014 #173
she is not couching the statement...that is YOU putting words in her mouth... VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #174
Cudnt agree more; Elizabeth is, w/o a doubt, THE most sure-footed woman in politics today which is why she didn't say she would NEVER run... InAbLuEsTaTe Jun 2014 #175
which is why you should believe her...she is getting P.O'd about people focussing on this issue VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #177
Elizabeth Warren, bein the wise, masterful politician she is, is not going 2 crumble 2 pressure & be annoyed into running, as you suggest, or doin anything else for that matter. InAbLuEsTaTe Jun 2014 #179
not even to your unmitigating power to annoy! VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #181
Peace be with you InAbLuEsTaTe Jun 2014 #183
Yeah, that's why she got almost 18M votes the last time she ran. Beacool Jun 2014 #111
LOL eom BlueMTexpat Jun 2014 #125
Yep, and all are experts on Hillary. juajen Jun 2014 #143
Most of them haven't even met her. Beacool Jun 2014 #146
True, but... DeadLetterOffice Jun 2014 #47
snippish azureblue Jun 2014 #90
I am a woman, and not a sexist. My choice of adjective was based on her tone in the interview. peacebird Jun 2014 #92
Bullshit Evergreen Emerald Jun 2014 #106
Right bach at'cha. I am a strong woman, and I say snippish describes her tone. peacebird Jun 2014 #130
Have you ever described a man as snippy? Evergreen Emerald Jun 2014 #132
Remember 2000? Gore said that to Bush. Reporting from the NY Times Magazine: 24601 Jun 2014 #150
Yes, I described Mittens as bing snippy peacebird Jun 2014 #189
Gross asked a fair question. /nt Ash_F Jun 2014 #152
I have to say that Gross would not let it go . . . brush Jun 2014 #180
Oh boy your in trouble now. Last time snippy was used in an election it was Gore saying it to Bush Exultant Democracy Jun 2014 #184
"Snippish" for a woman to stand up for herself Evergreen Emerald Jun 2014 #105
Don't you know? It's the new "uppity". Beacool Jun 2014 #118
Again, NOT EVERY DESCRIPTION IS RELATED TO RACE OR GENDER. Sometimes snippy is just snippy peacebird Jun 2014 #131
The sexist descriptons are related to gender. Evergreen Emerald Jun 2014 #134
This......... Beacool Jun 2014 #139
Gore to Bush 2000 "'There's no need to get snippy about it," Found one easy. Exultant Democracy Jun 2014 #185
It is sexist. Ugly. And an attempt to minimize her. Evergreen Emerald Jun 2014 #186
First off I found an example easily disproving your thesis. Are you saying Gore was being sexist? Exultant Democracy Jun 2014 #187
Thought the same thing. InAbLuEsTaTe Jun 2014 #158
That's kind of the same Delphinus Jun 2014 #160
Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2014 #182
Should have repeated the Benghazi comment: what difference does it make? question everything Jun 2014 #2
It could matter. If she evolved along the same lines of the US Population, probably not a big 24601 Jun 2014 #31
Yeah, but Obama was for marriage equality, then against it, then for it again. When asked about this Bluenorthwest Jun 2014 #81
All I know is he wrote a piece in favor of same-sex unions way back in 1996. nomorenomore08 Jun 2014 #170
I agree. A better question would be what she did on the issue as senator. yurbud Jun 2014 #46
I'd be curious to know what she thought customerserviceguy Jun 2014 #79
I don't think that as a senator she would have done anything question everything Jun 2014 #96
After reading the story IMO it's a non-event groundloop Jun 2014 #3
It is a big event because it demonstrates Hillary's huge problem. JDPriestly Jun 2014 #14
Yes, campaigns need to be forward looking. For whatever reasons, Hillary's ability to look to the future is seriously hampered. InAbLuEsTaTe Jun 2014 #76
Thank you. LittleGirl Jun 2014 #89
Classic political response to real journos:The 5 D's of Dodgeball Divernan Jun 2014 #93
Bullshit juajen Jun 2014 #144
their wealthy right wing wal-mart friends speak volumes reddread Jun 2014 #145
David Brock and I are kinda laughing right now. nt msanthrope Jun 2014 #149
YES! And don't forget that Bill Clinton was instrumental in the deregulation of Wall Street... InAbLuEsTaTe Jun 2014 #163
Thanks. JDPriestly Jun 2014 #171
and some people lagged behind the transformation. n/t PoliticAverse Jun 2014 #4
She evolved alright. ForgoTheConsequence Jun 2014 #5
She did what election bound politicians do period azurnoir Jun 2014 #7
Except that Bill Clinton signed the Defense of Marriage Act/ JDPriestly Jun 2014 #15
I agree, but I seem to remember something about Elizabeth Warren saying that TrollBuster9090 Jun 2014 #21
you may want to cite those memories reddread Jun 2014 #23
Sure, but I'm aware that it won't stop people from blathering about how TrollBuster9090 Jun 2014 #35
or people from applying past experiences to the present reddread Jun 2014 #67
Elizabeth Warren will run if she has the support and feels she can win for Democrats. JDPriestly Jun 2014 #25
I beg to differ: Elizabeth WILL run if the grassroots DEMAND that she run. The momentum is already starting to build and we're well over 2 yrs out. InAbLuEsTaTe Jun 2014 #80
Hillary has also said she was finished with elected office. nt 7962 Jun 2014 #91
I'm not sure about Warren but... hollowdweller Jun 2014 #28
+1000 JDPriestly Jun 2014 #30
Sometimes you choose the lesser of two evils. Had he vetoed it and sent it back, the response could 24601 Jun 2014 #36
there is no way DOMA would have been ratified as an amendment Doctor_J Jun 2014 #164
I'm not convinced. In 1996, the national mood was quite different than it is now. The first state, 24601 Jun 2014 #169
So Clinton automatically attributes her husbands actions? joshcryer Jun 2014 #53
"That sounds rather patriarchal to me." - Yep. And it's just like the "dynasty" meme that says NYC Liberal Jun 2014 #64
That is not the point at all. JDPriestly Jun 2014 #66
Welcome to misogyny. joshcryer Jun 2014 #68
Monica Lewinsky? Beacool Jun 2014 #110
I'm not invoking Monica Lewinsky. That is hitting below the belt. JDPriestly Jun 2014 #115
How many posts have you written on an OP that has zero to do with Warren? Beacool Jun 2014 #116
Hillary is a corporate candidate. And this country is in a populist mood. JDPriestly Jun 2014 #123
Again, your opinion. Beacool Jun 2014 #137
That's the dishonesty caught in the answer. Loudly Jun 2014 #155
The truly evolved were for it before it was a popular choice marshall Jun 2014 #72
HC follow$ the campaign donor$ and focu$ group$, in that order. Divernan Jun 2014 #95
You nailed it. Hillary is an opportunist, plain and simple. InAbLuEsTaTe Jun 2014 #77
It didn't sound snippy to me... The Road Runner Jun 2014 #6
See my post #15. JDPriestly Jun 2014 #16
I'm thinking of getting a bumper sticker made that reads... Javaman Jun 2014 #136
+1 JDPriestly Jun 2014 #141
I'm With You DallasNE Jun 2014 #52
I didn't hear any snapping - just a creation of RW cosmicone Jun 2014 #8
See my post #15. JDPriestly Jun 2014 #17
She didn't sound snappy to me either. Who cares what your post #15 says. Demit Jun 2014 #37
well, Leme Jun 2014 #43
I was wondering that too... The Road Runner Jun 2014 #45
I didn't hear snippy either n/t FreeState Jun 2014 #107
sometimes one does not think of an issue in specific terms, until the situation changes Leme Jun 2014 #9
See my post # 15. JDPriestly Jun 2014 #18
"And she will be held to answer for Bill Clinton's decisions, like it or not" TrollBuster9090 Jun 2014 #24
It isn't a matter of cheap political points. JDPriestly Jun 2014 #34
Do you want a follower/triangulator/poll reader as president? Doctor_J Jun 2014 #165
I heard the interview, and Gross wanted to score points. "Snappy" is a mischaracterization. n/t Tarheel_Dem Jun 2014 #10
See my post # 15. JDPriestly Jun 2014 #26
Thank you!! Beacool Jun 2014 #138
"I'm going to say what I know, what I believe & let the chips fall" HC 5/2014 Sunlei Jun 2014 #11
Please see my post # 15. JDPriestly Jun 2014 #20
We need Mrs Warren to stay a Senator and hold on to that seat for several years. Sunlei Jun 2014 #54
Read my post 15. If Hillary tries to run, she will be running against the past. JDPriestly Jun 2014 #60
Thank you for this eloquent post. Utopian Leftist Jun 2014 #70
I have not heard Warren speak of equality and I specifically look forward to hearing her speak of Bluenorthwest Jun 2014 #83
They are both in the 1%. 24601 Jun 2014 #154
Where's the snap? There was supposed to be an EARTHSHATTERING SNAP! TrollBuster9090 Jun 2014 #12
Please see my post 15. JDPriestly Jun 2014 #22
ho ho. Now the headline says--Hillary jabs at.... riversedge Jun 2014 #19
I'm going to go take a nap for 20 minutes. Wake me when they finally get around to the headline: TrollBuster9090 Jun 2014 #27
See my post # 15. JDPriestly Jun 2014 #29
please read post 15 groundloop Jun 2014 #100
please reread post 15 groundloop Jun 2014 #101
please re-reread post 15 groundloop Jun 2014 #102
please re-re-re-reread post 15 groundloop Jun 2014 #103
JD - I'd LOVE to have Warren run....but it just doesn't seem that she's going to this time groundloop Jun 2014 #104
BS. She didn't snap OKNancy Jun 2014 #32
No, she was clearly hysterical! Behind the Aegis Jun 2014 #38
LOL - I was going to make a crack OKNancy Jun 2014 #40
We are bad that way, you and me! LOL! Behind the Aegis Jun 2014 #41
I posted a picture of me on Facebook OKNancy Jun 2014 #42
I don't want to see the "#15" ever again! Cha Jun 2014 #133
That's what I was saying above, too. Obama, as a black male has had to straddle the opposition TrollBuster9090 Jun 2014 #56
If someone attacks her as being menopausal OKNancy Jun 2014 #59
To a group of people who think the female body can shut down ovulation in response to TrollBuster9090 Jun 2014 #61
+1 joshcryer Jun 2014 #65
Hillary said that in the past she worried too much. Beacool Jun 2014 #119
If she runs, the gloves will come off and more crap like the "article" will appear. Behind the Aegis Jun 2014 #120
She's not being held to the fire. Beacool Jun 2014 #121
Actually, this story was posted a few times in GD. Behind the Aegis Jun 2014 #122
I have no problem with her, or any other politician, having their feet held to the fire. Beacool Jun 2014 #167
Hey you. sheshe2 Jun 2014 #178
I listened to that interview while it was on the radio. murielm99 Jun 2014 #39
A politician can never answer "did you believe X before the public?" joshcryer Jun 2014 #48
Hillary is associated with the Cult that helped author Uganda's KILL THE GAYS bill; the Cult is blkmusclmachine Jun 2014 #49
Is this the National Prayer Breakfast conspiracy? joshcryer Jun 2014 #50
Here: blkmusclmachine Jun 2014 #55
I heard it live just now! Hillary loses her cool with softballs from NPR's Terry Gross uhnope Jun 2014 #51
Four things PSPS Jun 2014 #57
Is uppity and snippy the same thing? eo MyNameGoesHere Jun 2014 #58
Amazing how people get piled-upon here for evolving and coming around on these issues. NYC Liberal Jun 2014 #62
Clinton is a special case. joshcryer Jun 2014 #63
NPR = "Nice Polite Republicans" johnfunk Jun 2014 #71
National Petroleum Radio reddread Jun 2014 #82
Gives a whole new meaning to the words "slick programming" johnfunk Jun 2014 #135
Warren is the new Kucinich cosmicone Jun 2014 #73
I think Warren is more electable than Kucinich. joshcryer Jun 2014 #78
Are you kidding? cosmicone Jun 2014 #109
Right, fair enough. joshcryer Jun 2014 #113
Free Republic - DU Beacool Jun 2014 #112
Better headline. elleng Jun 2014 #75
The comment section over at TPM.... DonViejo Jun 2014 #98
Yes. elleng Jun 2014 #99
But, but, it's Hillary. Beacool Jun 2014 #117
You obviously haven't read post #15! JNelson6563 Jun 2014 #129
There IS a difference between Bill and Hillary Clinton, you know, elleng Jun 2014 #140
no "two'fer" this time? reddread Jun 2014 #142
Oh I know! JNelson6563 Jun 2014 #156
I will give it to President Obama... awoke_in_2003 Jun 2014 #85
Actually he supported equality as State Senator, opposed it as Presidential candidate, then Bluenorthwest Jun 2014 #87
What's all this ''evolve shit'' homosexuals have been around since the beginning of time. YOHABLO Jun 2014 #88
''We have always been at war with EastAsia.'' DeSwiss Jun 2014 #94
I am gay and proudly support her. hrmjustin Jun 2014 #97
+1 nt Raphael Campos Jun 2014 #124
Ahhh, DU............ Beacool Jun 2014 #108
I hate to disagree with Terry Gross frazzled Jun 2014 #114
I heard the interview and I didn't think Hillary was snippy. Sancho Jun 2014 #126
I never "evolved" Skittles Jun 2014 #127
The diofference between Bill and Hill DonCoquixote Jun 2014 #128
I get it, the little woman is too emotional for you. Beacool Jun 2014 #147
not emotional DonCoquixote Jun 2014 #148
I think our next candidate should be someone who has always supported gay marriage. Ash_F Jun 2014 #151
I have read so many different headlines on this, and it is really interesting how a one word changes Justice Jun 2014 #161
I don't appreciate you confusing the two. William769 Jun 2014 #166
I'm LGBT, and most likely will not vote for Hillary in the primary. But, in the GE, Zorra Jun 2014 #168
Prairie Home Companion just had a little skit poking fun at both Terry Gross and Hillary for that. Hekate Jun 2014 #176
Rope-a-dope. Orsino Jun 2014 #188
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»UPDATED: Hillary Jabs At ...»Reply #152