Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Hissyspit

(45,790 posts)
Thu Sep 18, 2014, 04:44 PM Sep 2014

BREAKING: Kansas Supreme Court Orders State to Remove Democrat's Name from Ballot in Senate Race [View all]

Source: Associated Press

@AP: BREAKING: Kansas Supreme Court orders state to remove Democrat's name from ballot in Senate race.

KANSAS COURT: REMOVE DEMOCRAT FROM SENATE BALLOT

By JOHN HANNA
— Sep. 18, 2014 6:03 PM EDT

TOPEKA, Kan. (AP) — Kansas must remove the name of the Democratic candidate against Republican Sen. Pat Roberts from the ballot, the state Supreme Court declared Thursday, in a unanimous ruling that could influence the fight for control of the U.S. Senate.

The court's decision leaves Democrats without a candidate, potentially making it easier for independent candidate Greg Orman to defeat the three-term incumbent. Republicans have counted on Roberts winning re-election in GOP-leaning Kansas as they seek to recapture a Senate majority.

Some Democrats nudged party nominee Chad Taylor out of the race earlier this month to avoid a major split of anti-Roberts votes. Taylor announced his withdrawal, but Secretary of State Kris Kobach, a conservative Republican publicly backing Roberts, declared that Taylor didn't comply with a state election law limiting when nominees can withdraw. Taylor petitioned the Supreme Court to remove his name from the ballot.

The justices unanimously agreed with Taylor, saying his formal letter of withdrawal to the secretary of state's office was sufficient to get his name off the ballot.

Read more: http://bigstory.ap.org/article/7a4dc22244254a03a970fea8cbaecfdb/kansas-court-remove-democrat-senate-ballot



Background:

http://bigstory.ap.org/article/kansas-judges-question-why-democrat-cant-withdraw

KANSAS JUDGES QUESTION WHY DEMOCRAT CAN'T WITHDRAW
By JOHN HANNA
— Sep. 16, 2014 11:36 AM EDT

Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach, center, walks with members of his staff and legal team into the Kansas Judicial Center to file documents in a legal dispute before the state Supreme Court over the Democratic nominee's attempt to get off the ballot in the U.S. Senate race, Monday, Sept. 15, 2014, in Topeka, Kan. With Kobach are, to his left, special projects coordinator Jameson Beckner and attorney Bradley Scholzman and, to his right, attorney Thomas Knutzen. (AP Photo/John Hanna)

TOPEKA, Kan. (AP) — Several Kansas Supreme Court justices are questioning why a Democratic candidate for the U.S. Senate who wants his name off the ballot should be prevented from doing so by the state's chief election officer.

The court heard arguments Tuesday in a case that has national implications because it could affect the battle for control of the Senate.

Democrat Chad Taylor's withdrawal could help independent candidate Greg Orman's chances to unseat vulnerable Republican incumbent Sen. Pat Roberts.

Republican Secretary of State Kris Kobach ruled that Taylor's name must remain on the ballot because he didn't comply with state election law.
86 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Yeah! irisblue Sep 2014 #1
YEAH!!! Hulk Sep 2014 #2
Yes.....good news...nt Stuart G Sep 2014 #3
YES! Dont call me Shirley Sep 2014 #4
And They Wonder billhicks76 Sep 2014 #5
They also make you wanna puke!! AngryDem001 Sep 2014 #13
Excellent! Justice in Kansas! Excellent! ... bet that really po's the KS PTB! RKP5637 Sep 2014 #6
GREAT! elleng Sep 2014 #7
K&R...Thanks for posting red dog 1 Sep 2014 #8
YESSSSSSS lamp_shade Sep 2014 #9
This is a good thing. wandy Sep 2014 #10
! immoderate Sep 2014 #11
Sweet. nt deminks Sep 2014 #12
Excellent! Control-Z Sep 2014 #14
According to the TRMS show the Secretary of State Kobach is making up new rules. TexasTowelie Sep 2014 #60
Unanimously! Take that Mr. (Koch) Kobach! n/t pampango Sep 2014 #15
This is the guy who the GOP wanted to keep on the ballot rocktivity Sep 2014 #16
Tsk tsk... Now who is the one really broke the weak laws here? TRoN33 Sep 2014 #17
K&R Woot! ~nt~ 99th_Monkey Sep 2014 #18
Sounds like here in Naples (Teabagger Area), Florida HockeyMom Sep 2014 #19
Hope you can write-in a suitable name - even your own. nt No Vested Interest Sep 2014 #68
This is good news for Alaska Blue_In_AK Sep 2014 #20
It won't have any effect. TexasTowelie Sep 2014 #61
I understand that, Blue_In_AK Sep 2014 #63
K & R SunSeeker Sep 2014 #21
K & R !!! WillyT Sep 2014 #22
pat roberts drray23 Sep 2014 #23
This message was self-deleted by its author bigworld Sep 2014 #24
Donald Peking Duck. Historic NY Sep 2014 #25
Ben Gazhi? Fred Sanders Sep 2014 #29
LOL. Historic NY Sep 2014 #35
Why? There are races running unopposed I thought still_one Sep 2014 #26
The court is not requiring that.. its Kobach the Rethug SOS who made that statement. DCBob Sep 2014 #27
I don't think so either. LiberalAndProud Sep 2014 #31
Excellent! DCBob Sep 2014 #33
"admonished Kobach for filing materials past the court's deadline" NYC Liberal Sep 2014 #44
good news, at least some people in Kansas have good sense wordpix Sep 2014 #85
The Supremes rightly ignored this issue. It looks like the Dems now have 10 days... IllinoisBirdWatcher Sep 2014 #37
Democrats should knuckle under.... whistler162 Sep 2014 #52
Not the court, Kobach, LiberalAndProud Sep 2014 #28
So the Democrats tell Kobach to fuck off..or he can go back to the Court for another beat down. Fred Sanders Sep 2014 #30
I have the niggling suspicion that this is LiberalAndProud Sep 2014 #34
Hot, hot, angry air because Kansas is now lost, the Senate is lost and Kobach is personally fucked. Fred Sanders Sep 2014 #42
I didn't see anything in the article linked that said the court was requiring A Simple Game Sep 2014 #32
Full written decision of court link...the court only granted mandamus, ordering removal of the name. Fred Sanders Sep 2014 #40
there is another lawsuit hfojvt Sep 2014 #72
Not the court saying that, Kobach is saying it in desperation, and holding up the printing of Fred Sanders Sep 2014 #36
The court addressed that issue on one paragraph of their opinion happyslug Sep 2014 #43
Wonderful, wonderful, wonderful! It's been forever since Democrats caught a break in Ks. n/t Judi Lynn Sep 2014 #38
This is very good news and could be the key race to retaining Senate control. DCBob Sep 2014 #39
Here is the actual Court opinion happyslug Sep 2014 #41
don't particularly think Pat Roberts complies with election law PatrynXX Sep 2014 #45
Good news, but the headline could have been more illuminating. George II Sep 2014 #46
I truly hope this works out for the Democrats. But isn't there some hypocracy at play here? rhett o rick Sep 2014 #47
Its all about retaining control of the Senate. DCBob Sep 2014 #55
As I said, I understand and agree. I just don't like it when the self-righteous tell rhett o rick Sep 2014 #67
Securing the Senate also trumps "values". DCBob Sep 2014 #74
However, since a Democrat is no longer on the ballot DUers can support a third party candidate. TexasTowelie Sep 2014 #62
I love your rationalization. nm rhett o rick Sep 2014 #66
I think that "rule" leftynyc Sep 2014 #71
I think you will find that most of the DU'ers pulling for Sen Sanders do so in the anticipation he rhett o rick Sep 2014 #75
Why would he do that? leftynyc Sep 2014 #76
If he runs as an Independent he will be shunned by the Corp-Media. nm rhett o rick Sep 2014 #78
he'll be shunned anyway as too old, too liberal, too socialist, too antiwar wordpix Sep 2014 #86
Hypocrisy? On the part of the GOP, perhaps. MADem Sep 2014 #80
A brief glimpse of sanity- KrazyinKS Sep 2014 #48
Wow! Will it be appealed and reversed? Cuz that how things roll in the US. nt valerief Sep 2014 #49
No this is The highest court in Kansas happyslug Sep 2014 #81
Wow! Now that amazes me. No recourse for Republicans. Well, except to Crock the Vote. nt valerief Sep 2014 #83
Off to the races n/t tooeyeten Sep 2014 #50
This is where election fraud happens: people like Kobach, Husted, Harris, Blackwell. riqster Sep 2014 #51
Ha! WhiteTara Sep 2014 #53
Kansas iamthebandfanman Sep 2014 #54
Side note: The Schloz is back! rurallib Sep 2014 #56
Okay, all together now . . . Jack Rabbit Sep 2014 #57
Go Sunflower State! Sienna86 Sep 2014 #58
Bu-Bye, Pat Roberts! ReRe Sep 2014 #59
Is that the end of it? Does the SoS have the option of appealing this? n/t. Ken Burch Sep 2014 #64
No this is The highest court in Kansas happyslug Sep 2014 #82
Suck on that KKKobach. SoapBox Sep 2014 #65
Typical Republican parlor tricks: davidpdx Sep 2014 #69
But will the SOS actually DO it??!! blkmusclmachine Sep 2014 #70
this is an odd thread hfojvt Sep 2014 #73
It's another defeat for voter suppression. randome Sep 2014 #77
Kris Kobach is an idiot Gothmog Sep 2014 #79
"whether it was sufficient for the Dem to simply cite the relevant law in his withdrawal letter" wordpix Sep 2014 #84
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»BREAKING: Kansas Supreme ...