Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: First Ebola Case is Diagnosed in the U.S., CDC Reports [View all]defacto7
(14,162 posts)64. Yes a sneeze. That is not an airborne scenario.
And immediate contact with bodily fluid of an infected person who is showing symptoms of the disease. It doesn't not mean people on the flight or in a bus or in a restaurant who breath the same air. That is airborne and it is not transmitted that way.
But if the person has symptoms and sneezes in your face or on your hand and you touch your mouth or eyes, it is possible. That is casual contact not airborne. If the person shows symptoms - Sneezing coughing, diarrhea or later symptoms - blood showing, it is transmittable. It is transmittable through bodily fluids - sweat, mucus, sexual fluids, blood, or fecal material or fecal mucus.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
96 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
All it takes is some person who has been exposed where the disease exists to get on a plain and fly
jwirr
Sep 2014
#29
I'm under the impression that the disease is passed via contact with thr afflicted's body fluids.
notadmblnd
Sep 2014
#21
A sneeze can eject both body gases and fluids. If you have ever felt you palm damp after
24601
Sep 2014
#65
I'm also assuming this person used the facilities at least once during that long flight
theHandpuppet
Sep 2014
#36
It is transmissible only after symptoms start. If they had no symptoms, they were not contagious
uppityperson
Oct 2014
#83
Yeah, I just heard today that he was in US for 4 days before developing symptoms.
Chemisse
Oct 2014
#92
I loved "The Shock Doctrine" (that is if you can love something so alarming)
RufusTFirefly
Sep 2014
#37
You're welcome, BlancheSplanchnik! Naomi's messages may seem bleak, but...
RufusTFirefly
Sep 2014
#41
A hospital in Dallas had been testing a person based on their travel history
rocktivity
Sep 2014
#18
In the USA, it doesn't matter if the doctors cure or not, what matters is their bill gets paid.
Trillo
Sep 2014
#49
No, it will kill off healthcare providers as the people go to clinics for the "flu"
McCamy Taylor
Sep 2014
#44
Since he didn't have symptoms and was not contagious at that time, what does it matter?
uppityperson
Oct 2014
#85
Do you not believe in an incubation period? Do you believe it strikes instantly, that viruses
uppityperson
Oct 2014
#89