Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Dog Owner Gets At Least 15 Years In Fatal Mauling [View all]mahatmakanejeeves
(68,221 posts)72. From that article:
A San Francisco woman was convicted of second-degree murder in the fatal mauling of her neighbor in the hallway outside her San Francisco apartment in 2001. A Michigan couple faces trial for second-degree murder in the deadly mauling of a jogger by their two dogs this summer.
I remember that.
15 years to life in S.F. dog maul death
Bob Egelko, Chronicle Staff Writer
Published 4:00 am, Tuesday, September 23, 2008
Marjorie Knoller did practically nothing while her dogs were fatally mauling a neighbor in a San Francisco apartment hallway, and later blamed the victim for her own death, a judge said Monday in sentencing the former attorney to 15 years to life in prison for second-degree murder.
....
Woolard said Knoller had not bothered to put a muzzle on her aggressive 140-pound Presa Canario dog before taking it out of the apartment. Knoller did not call for help, retrieve a weapon or dial 911 while the animal was mauling Diane Whipple for at least 10 minutes, the judge said. A second Presa Canario that Knoller and her husband and law partner, Robert Noel, kept in their apartment may have joined the attack.
Whipple, 33, the women's lacrosse coach at St. Mary's College in Moraga, bled to death from at least 77 wounds. Knoller, 53, was paroled from prison in 2004 after serving about three years for involuntary manslaughter, but was returned to custody Aug. 22 after Woolard reinstated the jury's murder verdict. Knoller's husband, who was not home when the attack happened, was convicted of involuntary manslaughter and paroled in September 2003.
Death of Diane Whipple
At the time of her death, Whipple lived in San Francisco's Pacific Heights with her domestic partner of six years, Sharon Smith.
....
The dogs' actual owner, Paul Schneider, was a high-ranking member of the prison gang the Aryan Brotherhood who was serving a life sentence in Pelican Bay State Prison.
....
On August 23, 2010, the First District Court of Appeal unanimously upheld Knoller's conviction, finding that she acted with a conscious disregard for human life when her Presa Canario escaped and killed Whipple. Knoller is currently serving her sentence at Valley State Prison for Women in Chowchilla.
Whipple's partner, Sharon Smith, also succeeded in suing Knoller and Noel for $1,500,000 in civil damages. She donated some of the money to Saint Mary's College of California to fund the women's lacrosse team.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
105 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Some men do harm too. So we should call all men ticking time bombs and ban them all.
DesertDiamond
Oct 2014
#27
i lived next to 2 pits for a decade. squared off on me a couple times. took out the rottweiler
seabeyond
Oct 2014
#55
You can throw good pitbull stories at me all day. There still is little reason to have those dogs
brewens
Oct 2014
#9
Unless you want a sweet, loving dog who loves all living beings, like all the pit bulls I have known
DesertDiamond
Oct 2014
#29
I have known a couple of dozen pitties over the years and none of them owned by wannabe tough guys
DesertDiamond
Oct 2014
#65
Why did they need to be foreclosed? Did no one report them and have them shut down?
DesertDiamond
Oct 2014
#26
I agree, dog fighting is a crime & it is criminal animal abuse. Call the police.
Sunlei
Oct 2014
#52
This was not about pit bulls snapping. They were TRAINED to attack to protect his drug business.
DesertDiamond
Oct 2014
#25
Thank you! And this story illustrates that. Meth lab owner trains them to attack and probably gives
DesertDiamond
Oct 2014
#74
Horrific that you blame all for the actions of a few. The word for that is "bigot."
DesertDiamond
Oct 2014
#30
And again, most pitties are NOT bred to be attack dogs. And they do not attack
DesertDiamond
Oct 2014
#66
No, they were originally bred to be nanny dogs and take care of children. The "pit bull" label was
DesertDiamond
Oct 2014
#75
Some pit bulls are bred for aggression;some men are too. So we should ban both pit bulls and men.
DesertDiamond
Oct 2014
#23
I'm guessing secondvariety does not train pitties to attack, as did the meth lab owner in this story
DesertDiamond
Oct 2014
#67
He didn't keep them well confined because he kept them to protect his drug business.
DesertDiamond
Oct 2014
#34
You're right, where it happened isn't relevant. Thank you for all that you said.
DesertDiamond
Oct 2014
#79
And I'm guessing he probably also gave them meth, or gunpowder, which is what they do to make the
DesertDiamond
Oct 2014
#81
"Any dog can be dangerous in whatever they consider is the right circumstances"
EX500rider
Oct 2014
#48
Yes! Some people don't get that their dog roaming free is also IN danger!
DesertDiamond
Oct 2014
#80
So true! People who don't confine and leash their dogs endanger the public AND their dogs!
DesertDiamond
Oct 2014
#78
The sentence is 15 *to life*. He won't even come up for parole for 15 years, and he won't
tblue37
Oct 2014
#104
I agree—but read through the thread above, you'll understand what I'm talking about...
C Moon
Oct 2014
#19
I agree. I know a lot of pit bulls, and they are ALL sweet and harmless. To insist they are
DesertDiamond
Oct 2014
#35
And euthanize anyone of any breed who might be harmful. Hey, ANYONE could snap and become dangerous.
DesertDiamond
Oct 2014
#36
I actually have a sweet, loving pit bull in foster care. He is kind to everyone including cats
DesertDiamond
Oct 2014
#68
Not everyONE, but every (non-human) animal that is potentially lethal to humans.
onwardsand upwards
Oct 2014
#58
Again, if we are going to generalize about dangerous living beings, humans can be dangerous too
DesertDiamond
Oct 2014
#70
There's a line somewhere, and some smart and informed person should draw it.
onwardsand upwards
Oct 2014
#60
The owner is 100% at fault here. This woman and the dogs had to pay for his carelessness
logosoco
Oct 2014
#44
I totally agree. In the very small percentage of pit bulls who attack, it's always a human who
DesertDiamond
Oct 2014
#71
I do wish people would stop breeding pit bulls, but also stop breeding ALL dogs and cats!
Arugula Latte
Oct 2014
#63
Thank you! We have enough rescue animals for all who want a pet. Why breed more???
DesertDiamond
Oct 2014
#83
I remember that. SO glad Knoller was convicted of murder. Dog was a Presa Canario, not a pittie but
DesertDiamond
Oct 2014
#84
Bingo! "My big cat wouldn't hurt a fly." Until it does. Cuz it's bred that way. nt
valerief
Oct 2014
#103