Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Wife confirms man killed in plane crash is Senate candidate [View all]hack89
(39,181 posts)24. Wellstone died because he had a crappy pilot.
Aviation Charters lead ground instructor stated that the pilot was average on
learning airplane systems and that several company pilots had indicated that the pilots
flying skills were below average. Several Aviation Charter pilots who had flown with the
accident pilot described him as very meticulous, by the book, calm, and laid back.
The pilot was also described as friendly, cheerful, pleasant, calm, and diligent in
his use of checklists. According to several Aviation Charter copilots, the accident pilot was
generally well liked by them because he had a reputation for letting them fly the airplane.
A few copilots stated that because the pilot often let them handle the flight controls, they
were not certain of his skill level. Several Aviation Charter pilots indicated that the accident
pilot often allowed them to conduct the flights they flew with him as if they were
single-pilot operations (that is, he allowed them to handle the flight controls and
communications and perform all of the checklists without his assistance).
One Aviation Charter pilot expressed concerns about the pilots flying skills,
monitoring capabilities, and tendency to become distracted. Some company pilots stated that
the accident pilot was not particularly assertive; however, other pilots stated that they
thought the accident pilot could be assertive, if necessary. One company pilot, who had
flown with the accident pilot shortly after Aviation Charter hired him, described him as too
timid to be a pilot. An Aviation Charter King Air pilot indicated that he had taken the
airplane controls away from the accident pilot during an instrument approach because he
could not maintain altitude. A company King Air copilot indicated that during level flight in
IMC, he had to take the controls away from the accident pilot because he allowed the
airplane to enter a 45° bank and a 1,000-fpm descent.
learning airplane systems and that several company pilots had indicated that the pilots
flying skills were below average. Several Aviation Charter pilots who had flown with the
accident pilot described him as very meticulous, by the book, calm, and laid back.
The pilot was also described as friendly, cheerful, pleasant, calm, and diligent in
his use of checklists. According to several Aviation Charter copilots, the accident pilot was
generally well liked by them because he had a reputation for letting them fly the airplane.
A few copilots stated that because the pilot often let them handle the flight controls, they
were not certain of his skill level. Several Aviation Charter pilots indicated that the accident
pilot often allowed them to conduct the flights they flew with him as if they were
single-pilot operations (that is, he allowed them to handle the flight controls and
communications and perform all of the checklists without his assistance).
One Aviation Charter pilot expressed concerns about the pilots flying skills,
monitoring capabilities, and tendency to become distracted. Some company pilots stated that
the accident pilot was not particularly assertive; however, other pilots stated that they
thought the accident pilot could be assertive, if necessary. One company pilot, who had
flown with the accident pilot shortly after Aviation Charter hired him, described him as too
timid to be a pilot. An Aviation Charter King Air pilot indicated that he had taken the
airplane controls away from the accident pilot during an instrument approach because he
could not maintain altitude. A company King Air copilot indicated that during level flight in
IMC, he had to take the controls away from the accident pilot because he allowed the
airplane to enter a 45° bank and a 1,000-fpm descent.
http://www.ntsb.gov/doclib/reports/2003/AAR0303.pdf
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
63 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I was thinking the same. We are all soooo cynical when it comes to a little plane and the powerful
seabeyond
Oct 2014
#7
The NTSB issued a 76 page report where they discussed the beacon in great detail.
hack89
Oct 2014
#21
FBI must first rule that it was other than an accident for NTSB full investigaion.
kickysnana
Oct 2014
#32
Yep, that's why I don't attach any conpiracy of sabotage to this particular crash.
GGJohn
Oct 2014
#56
Yep, Oregon Republicans are desperate if they pick a bum like this as their state party chair!
cascadiance
Oct 2014
#17
Some might ask what could have happened in 2000 in Florida if Nader had died before the election...
cascadiance
Oct 2014
#16
No reason to speculate whether Mike Connell's plane wasn't an accident either...
cascadiance
Oct 2014
#35
All King Air certified pilots have to have excellent skills to be certified.
Fred Sanders
Oct 2014
#37
Who needs all that government meddling into airplane inspections anyway?
Spitfire of ATJ
Oct 2014
#28