Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: COURT FINALLY OVERTURNS MARISSA ALEXANDER’S 20 YEAR SENTENCE. [View all]rocktivity
(44,981 posts)62. DING DING DING! Travelman, you're our grand prize winner!
Last edited Mon Jul 27, 2015, 07:43 PM - Edit history (3)
This is not, was not, and never will be a case of self-defense. This is a case of a disturbed...dangerous woman who committed attempted murder....(A)fter Marissa filed for and received a restraining order against Gray in 2009, she learned she was pregnant and asked the court to amend the restraining order to remove the ban on her and Gray having contact, while maintaining the rest of the restraining order...(H)er defense had an expert on battered women testify at her trial...(that) domestic-violence victims often allow their abusers back into their lives.
In May 2010 while the restraining order was still in place Marissa Alexander and Gray were married. Alexander gave birth to their baby in August 2010, but...for the last two months of her pregnancy...she lived with her mother, meaning that Alexander and Gray werent living in the same house when the incident occurred... (link)
In May 2010 while the restraining order was still in place Marissa Alexander and Gray were married. Alexander gave birth to their baby in August 2010, but...for the last two months of her pregnancy...she lived with her mother, meaning that Alexander and Gray werent living in the same house when the incident occurred... (link)
When Gray returned, the family ate breakfast together without incident. The trouble began when Alexander gave her phone to Gray so he could see pictures of their newborn, who was still in the hospital...While looking at the pictures, Gray noticed text messages between Alexander and her ex-husband...which prompted Gray to confront Alexander about whether the baby was his... (link)
She had no business being in Gray's home, and I certainly question her judgement in leaving the hospital (I have read nothing to the effect that she had been released). If she and the baby had been there for more than a week, both of them must have been having some post-natal medical problems.
...Alexander...was arrested for domestic battery against Gray on December 30, 2010, while she was out on bail and...awaiting trial...
The victim [Gray] stated that his estranged wife [Alexander] had come to his residence to drop off their child...[Gray] stated that an argument ensued when he would not allow her to stay overnight at his residence. The police report noted that Grays left eye appeared swollen and bloodied...
When the responding officer met with Alexander approximately an hour after the incident, she initially claimed that she...had an alibi... Alexander changed her story and eventually claimed that...Gray...(h)ad attacked her...after she wouldnt stay for the night. The officer wrote that Alexander had no visible injuries. Alexander was arrested and bond was revoked...She entered a plea of no contest to the domestic battery charges on March 27, 2012. (link)
The victim [Gray] stated that his estranged wife [Alexander] had come to his residence to drop off their child...[Gray] stated that an argument ensued when he would not allow her to stay overnight at his residence. The police report noted that Grays left eye appeared swollen and bloodied...
When the responding officer met with Alexander approximately an hour after the incident, she initially claimed that she...had an alibi... Alexander changed her story and eventually claimed that...Gray...(h)ad attacked her...after she wouldnt stay for the night. The officer wrote that Alexander had no visible injuries. Alexander was arrested and bond was revoked...She entered a plea of no contest to the domestic battery charges on March 27, 2012. (link)
rocktivity
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
398 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I fear you're right. I found this article that seems to cast doubt on her chances:
NYC_SKP
Oct 2014
#379
Again, if you ever live life inside a dwelling as a woman with an enraged partner
truedelphi
Oct 2014
#241
MY aren't we special? After all, inter galactic avengers are a dime a dozen,
truedelphi
Oct 2014
#323
That is typical in abusive situations, abusers manipulate everyone around them
Tumbulu
Oct 2014
#216
And despite your rudeness and crudeness, I am neither silly nor telling lies about you.
merrily
Oct 2014
#292
Good lord. Read for comprehension, please. I was not accusing you of getting paid or of
merrily
Oct 2014
#294
Oh, please. Not everyone gets alerted on and not everyone posts the way he's been posting either.
merrily
Oct 2014
#299
You've had many other replies. This is the last. Sorry to have disappointed you,
merrily
Oct 2014
#304
No back pedal whatsoever. Amost anyone reading Reply 285 would get that I never accused you
merrily
Oct 2014
#303
that's probably one of the more misogynist posts I've read throughout this debate.
redruddyred
Oct 2014
#353
She had the right to come back. Once she came back, she had the right to stand her ground.n/t
ieoeja
Oct 2014
#69
Except she walked through the door and opened fire. That is not standing your ground.
hack89
Oct 2014
#74
Walking back into a house and pointing a gun at three people, for starters. nt
msanthrope
Oct 2014
#169
If she ran into him the next day and there was no threatening, physical violence,
GGJohn
Oct 2014
#77
Yes...that's what she was convicted of. And she will be convicted of, again. nt
msanthrope
Oct 2014
#259
Stand Your Ground for a black person, a woman even? Holy cow. Is this all to get
valerief
Oct 2014
#24
Of course he applies the self-defense standard. SYG does not apply here--the Florida courts have
msanthrope
Oct 2014
#113
Funny...the door opened to put her car in, and when the police tried it. nt
msanthrope
Oct 2014
#149
He said that after she violated a court order to tamper with his testimony.
lumberjack_jeff
Oct 2014
#152
She walked past the front door as she went into the garage to get her gun from her car
hack89
Oct 2014
#40
you are absolutely right it doesn't make sense but its exactly what abused women do again and again
kmlisle
Oct 2014
#247
Still this is part of a pattern in which the criminal justice system treats women and people of
kmlisle
Oct 2014
#272
It can drive a person wild considering the difference in treatment between Marissa Alexander's case
Judi Lynn
Oct 2014
#26
she may have been stupid, but that doesn't make her the principal aggressor.
redruddyred
Oct 2014
#204
He wasn't beating on her that day, her life was NOT in imminent danger that day,
GGJohn
Oct 2014
#357
why aren't you advocating him serving a minimum sentence for the serial abuse?
Tumbulu
Oct 2014
#224
if her husband had been in jail in the first place, none of this would have happened.
redruddyred
Oct 2014
#354
If Marissa was in the process of being beaten, I would have applauded her for shooting him
Lurks Often
Oct 2014
#359
The jury found her testimony completely unreliable, they took only 12 minutes to convict her.
GGJohn
Oct 2014
#363
Their mind is made up based on whatever initial poor reporting they listened to.
NOVA_Dem
Oct 2014
#63
Yes, she is. She might get off due to trial publicity, but it's a long shot. nt
msanthrope
Oct 2014
#116
The pretrial SYG ruling indicates that she had a restraining order against him.
lumberjack_jeff
Oct 2014
#314
Oh and he let her in and cooked her breakfast- so why didn't he call the police when she arrived?
Tumbulu
Oct 2014
#190
You should probably educate yourself on this case before posting what you believe to be the "facts".
GGJohn
Oct 2014
#197
So... you'd have killed him. Fair enough. What would you have done with the witnesses? n/t
lumberjack_jeff
Oct 2014
#230
well, that is some good news. but the whole trial was a freaking obscenity, and would never
niyad
Oct 2014
#215
No, she fired at his head, narrowly missing him, the bullet traveled through the wall
GGJohn
Oct 2014
#319
Perhaps you'll consider it less of an obscenity once you familiarize yourself with the case...
lumberjack_jeff
Oct 2014
#321
I have not seen a worse case of deliberate disinformation since Crystal Mangum.
lumberjack_jeff
Oct 2014
#229
Even if every bad thing written about her happens to be true, 20 years is still excessive. n/t
nomorenomore08
Oct 2014
#328