Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

karynnj

(60,831 posts)
50. This ignores that both Ukrainian parties had run on working for this EU relationship
Mon Oct 20, 2014, 10:06 AM
Oct 2014

That relationship did not preclude Ukraine having ties to both sides. In fact concurrent to the very beginning of the Ukraine crisis, this is what Secretary Kerry called for in Moldova where Russia had "punished" them for ties with the west by banning their wine from Russia.

These comments actually sound like what you were recommending for Ukraine becoming a bridge between east and west.

" “We have been very clear with the Russians that we don't see any need to see the decision of Moldova and Georgia to initial agreements with the EU as a zero-sum game, and that we think that kind of play is self-defeating,” the official said.

“If Russia's neighbors become richer and more prosperous as a result of having visa liberalization to the European Union and increased trade, they are more able to buy more things from Russia as well, and they are more stable on Russia's periphery.”
http://www.voanews.com/content/reu-kerry-visits-western-leaning-moldova-to-show-support/1803456.html

In fact, it was RUSSIA's push that led to the pro Russian President of Ukraine to step back from an agreement that he had been for when he ran for President. You could argue that Russia did not want Ukraine to be a "bridge", but rather a buffer state that was 100% aligned with them.

One question for you would be if Ukraine signing an agreement with the EU -- not NATO - that reduced trade barriers with Europe was making Ukraine the bridge that you support --- or a step too far -- clearly the position of Russia.

(Side question - Do you agree that Russia acted vindictively in the case of Moldova? )



Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

It also contradicts the Nulandistas on DU n/t cosmicone Oct 2014 #1
And it contradicts the Putinistas who insist it the was Kiev government. NT Adrahil Oct 2014 #2
^^^^^ This! +1. n/t ColesCountyDem Oct 2014 #3
+1 PatrynXX Oct 2014 #4
+infinity!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!nt newfie11 Oct 2014 #11
You just have to wait a bit ... first the weapon's origin comes out cosmicone Oct 2014 #13
Sometimes I think you must be having fun. Adrahil Oct 2014 #15
I do have a lot of fun here cosmicone Oct 2014 #16
Well, you seem so very sure that the West is always the bad guy and the the poor Adrahil Oct 2014 #19
It was Pres. Obama with a new CIA super duper secret remote GGJohn Oct 2014 #23
I never said CIA launched the missile did I? cosmicone Oct 2014 #29
Then why is your favorite source, rt sounding like the proverbial chicken with its head cut off? karynnj Oct 2014 #20
Because the other shoe is about to fall. cosmicone Oct 2014 #28
You believe this for what reason? karynnj Oct 2014 #45
You're a cartoon. nt Codeine Oct 2014 #21
Personal attacks reveal the bankruptcy of cognition. n/t cosmicone Oct 2014 #27
Are you a fortune cookie? Throd Oct 2014 #42
Nulandists???? If you mean people who support Obama, this does not really copntradict karynnj Oct 2014 #18
Ahhh...So It Was Ukranian After All billhicks76 Oct 2014 #5
The area of the launch is a pretty good indicator of who fired it. Spider Jerusalem Oct 2014 #6
There are no pro-western rebels. And the area of launch was from rebel-controlled territory. geek tragedy Oct 2014 #7
Uh So Says NSA/CIA billhicks76 Oct 2014 #9
+1 newfie11 Oct 2014 #12
You read too much Russian state propaganda. nt geek tragedy Oct 2014 #22
You Don't Know What You Are Talking About billhicks76 Oct 2014 #24
I Don't Even Know What Russian Media is? billhicks76 Oct 2014 #25
+1 n/t cosmicone Oct 2014 #17
That is not conclusive evidence. Major Hogwash Oct 2014 #8
Ukraine was part of the Soviet Union CJCRANE Oct 2014 #10
And that leads to the obvious conclusion . . . Major Hogwash Oct 2014 #14
It was a Russian-made missile owned by the Ukrainian government. CJCRANE Oct 2014 #34
Go one step further karynnj Oct 2014 #47
I agree with your first point CJCRANE Oct 2014 #48
I agree - not to mention there is nothing that makes this intelligence report karynnj Oct 2014 #53
That Is An Excellent Analysis, Ma'am The Magistrate Oct 2014 #55
Well, now apparently the Ukrainian govt disagrees with the German report CJCRANE Oct 2014 #56
Ukraine is not changing its story - they never said it was one of theirs karynnj Oct 2014 #58
Another point: claims that the rebels shot down a military cargo plane that day at the same place muriel_volestrangler Oct 2014 #59
Makes sense to me karynnj Oct 2014 #60
That One, Sir, Went Smack Into The Memory Hole The Magistrate Oct 2014 #61
ah...So I was right all along... Blue_Tires Oct 2014 #26
Reading the replies to this thread.....fucking amazing..... Xolodno Oct 2014 #30
You Are Mis-Stating Facts, Sir The Magistrate Oct 2014 #31
Magistrate.... Xolodno Oct 2014 #32
Neither This Nor Your Following Comment, Sir, Addresses The Point At Hand The Magistrate Oct 2014 #36
This ignores that both Ukrainian parties had run on working for this EU relationship karynnj Oct 2014 #50
One more statement.... Xolodno Oct 2014 #33
"it was the Ukrainian Rebels with a captured missile (authenticating Russia's claim)" - no muriel_volestrangler Oct 2014 #38
The jury is still out on what the Ukrainian government and ATC knew CJCRANE Oct 2014 #35
None Of Which, Sir, Affects Who Pulled The Trigger The Magistrate Oct 2014 #37
True. But there is also the concept of negligence in the law. CJCRANE Oct 2014 #39
One Presumes You are Referring To 'Contributory Negligence', Sir The Magistrate Oct 2014 #40
It's a very clear cut legal concept. That's why the FAA halted flights to Israel CJCRANE Oct 2014 #41
Apples And Oranges, Sir The Magistrate Oct 2014 #43
They considered the area unsafe. The same as in the Ukraine CJCRANE Oct 2014 #44
And That Would Not Affect The Criminal Responsibility Of The Men Who Fired The Missile, Sir The Magistrate Oct 2014 #46
That's true. But the victims' relatives may still want to pursue action CJCRANE Oct 2014 #49
So You Admit It Has No Bearing On The Point At Hand, Sir The Magistrate Oct 2014 #51
I agree, I think that's the most likely scenario CJCRANE Oct 2014 #52
So You May Yet Resort To 'False Flag' Swill Then, Sir? The Magistrate Oct 2014 #54
Have you read the full 9/11 report? CJCRANE Oct 2014 #57
Most people here believed it was the pro-Russian rebels from the get-go. Tommy_Carcetti Oct 2014 #62
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Germany says rebels used ...»Reply #50