Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bananas

(27,509 posts)
6. Two things need to be done about Ebola.
Fri Oct 31, 2014, 07:12 AM
Oct 2014

Hugh Gusterson points out:

http://thebulletin.org/isis-vs-ebola7753

I am struck by a kind of magical thinking among Americans who cling to the belief that, in a globalized world, they will be immune to eruptions of infectious disease in countries with collapsed public health systems as if they had nothing to do with us. If there is a single lesson about security, it is that it is indivisible. We cannot be truly safe from an epidemic if thousands of others are dying from it, even if they are on a different continent. Viruses cross borders more easily than terrorists.

The number of Ebola cases in Africa is doubling every three weeks. The New York Times reports that unless the West gives massive aid, experts fear a new infection rate of 10,000 cases per month in West Africa, with the total number of dead rising to as many as 1.4 million by early 2015. Remember that, with only 4,500 dead by official counts, Ebola has already made it to Europe and the United States. Now we are anticipating more than three hundred times as many dead, unless strong preventive action is taken. This increases the likelihood that individual cases of Ebola will recurrently appear in the United States, requiring strenuous programs of biocontainment, waste incineration, and epidemiological tracking to stop them from spreading. But even if, unlike SARS and avian flu, Ebola can be kept out of the bloodstream of international tourism, commerce, and refugee movements, think of the human catastrophe that 1.4 million Africans dying painful, lonely deaths represents. When 800,000 Rwandans died in 1994, we called it genocide and wondered how the Clinton administration could have done nothing as the massacre unfolded. Will the Obama administration now stand idly by as twice as many Africans are massacred by a virus that can be stopped not at our borders, but only at the source?


Nurses unions are telling us what they need to do their job:
http://www.nationalnursesunited.org/page/s/national-nurses-united-urges-you-to-take-action-now

Nurses across the country demand that President Obama take action now.
Sign below to demand protection for all healthcare workers.

On behalf of registered nurses and other healthcare workers across the United States, we understand that the only way to adequately confront the Ebola crisis, that the World Health Organization has termed the most significant health crisis in modern history, is for the President to invoke his executive authority to mandate uniform, national standards and protocols that all hospitals must follow to safely protect patients, registered nurses, other front-line healthcare workers, and the public. Every healthcare employer must be directed to follow the Precautionary Principle and institute optimal protocols and personal protective equipment for Ebola that meets the highest standards used by Nebraska Medical Center, or a higher standard, including:

<snip>

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The original pdf's are in the wayback machine (archive.org) bananas Oct 2014 #1
wayback machine is my standard PatrynXX Oct 2014 #27
Ebola! Ebola! Ebola! Shadowflash Oct 2014 #2
Two things need to be done about Ebola. bananas Oct 2014 #6
Here is a pic to go with that. yellowcanine Oct 2014 #22
Thanks! Shadowflash Oct 2014 #26
Here's the DU thread mentioned in the article bananas Oct 2014 #3
We'd save a lot more lives getting people to stop smoking. merrily Oct 2014 #4
Thanks for providing another example of "the empiricism of the idiots." bananas Oct 2014 #7
Luckily Taleb is not an epidemiologist. Warren Stupidity Oct 2014 #10
He's an expert on risk, only an idiot would ignore him. nt bananas Oct 2014 #13
he is not an expert on epidemiology or ebola. Warren Stupidity Oct 2014 #28
He didn't say "quarantine" bananas Oct 2014 #21
No he didn't use the "q" word. Warren Stupidity Oct 2014 #29
Thanks for providing a side of offensive overreaction with your Henny Penny entree. merrily Oct 2014 #19
They are hiding the massive outbreak here by secretly transporting all the infected people Warren Stupidity Oct 2014 #5
Over at conservativecrackpots.com, they hate unions and nurses. bananas Oct 2014 #8
Well, that certainly explains leftynyc Oct 2014 #9
But the information wasn't wrong, and now they make it look like they're hiding something. bananas Oct 2014 #11
Agree leftynyc Oct 2014 #12
That's what the Surgeon General is for - and why it's important to get out the vote. bananas Oct 2014 #14
I don't understand why Democrats aren't leftynyc Oct 2014 #15
You are probly right about riversedge Oct 2014 #16
Yes. They look stupid. 840high Oct 2014 #24
Why is it always "quietly" removed? cactusfractal Oct 2014 #17
They need to post this for a day before changing items on their webpages sharp_stick Oct 2014 #25
It was causing confusion so it has been updated KMOD Oct 2014 #18
. stonecutter357 Oct 2014 #20
Pretty much because sharp_stick Oct 2014 #23
It needed to be removed because it was taken out of context. cynzke Oct 2014 #30
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»CDC Removed Info On Cough...»Reply #6