Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: U.S. attorney general bans asset seizure by local police [View all]eridani
(51,907 posts)13. WaPo link
http://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/holder-ends-seized-asset-sharing-process-that-split-billions-with-local-state-police/2015/01/16/0e7ca058-99d4-11e4-bcfb-059ec7a93ddc_story.html?tid=pm_investigations_pop
Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. on Friday barred local and state police from using federal law to seize cash, cars and other property without proving that a crime occurred.
Holders action represents the most sweeping check on police power to confiscate personal property since the seizures began three decades ago as part of the war on drugs.
Since 2008, thousands of local and state police agencies have made more than 55,000 seizures of cash and property worth $3 billion under a civil asset forfeiture program at the Justice Department called Equitable Sharing.
The program has enabled local and state police to make seizures and then have them adopted by federal agencies, which share in the proceeds. The program allowed police departments and drug task forces to keep up to 80 percent of the proceeds of the adopted seizures, with the rest going to federal agencies.
With this new policy, effective immediately, the Justice Department is taking an important step to prohibit federal agency adoptions of state and local seizures, except for public safety reasons, Holder said in a statement.
Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. on Friday barred local and state police from using federal law to seize cash, cars and other property without proving that a crime occurred.
Holders action represents the most sweeping check on police power to confiscate personal property since the seizures began three decades ago as part of the war on drugs.
Since 2008, thousands of local and state police agencies have made more than 55,000 seizures of cash and property worth $3 billion under a civil asset forfeiture program at the Justice Department called Equitable Sharing.
The program has enabled local and state police to make seizures and then have them adopted by federal agencies, which share in the proceeds. The program allowed police departments and drug task forces to keep up to 80 percent of the proceeds of the adopted seizures, with the rest going to federal agencies.
With this new policy, effective immediately, the Justice Department is taking an important step to prohibit federal agency adoptions of state and local seizures, except for public safety reasons, Holder said in a statement.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
71 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
But, but... Eric Holder! Barack Obama! Police State! FEMA camps! Free Obamaphones!
freshwest
Jan 2015
#3
Well, this was a classic rightwing taunt posted here... Omitting a racist comment... He got pizza.
freshwest
Jan 2015
#43
Thank you. Just wondered because I just applied for the Obamaphone. And I will be getting it. For
jwirr
Jan 2015
#44
So that is where the "free stuff" came from. Actually is is cheaper than the little necklace that
jwirr
Jan 2015
#58
wait, wait, I NEVER got no damn Obamaphone! Where's the Dept. of Free Phones office?
yurbud
Jan 2015
#63
Darn right! Lets make THIS the issue that they can agree on. I'd love it. Thanks for that link
7962
Jan 2015
#22
Yes he is the head of the county government, several links to news stories...
Historic NY
Jan 2015
#48
If I'm understanding this correctly, it means in states without laws allowing forfiture at arrest...
herding cats
Jan 2015
#20
Actually, there are enough state laws allowing asset forfeiture on the books.
egold2604
Jan 2015
#25