Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
The Fact-Checkers Are Clueless [View all] Uncle Joe Aug 2018 OP
No, they're not. And facts matter. Hortensis Aug 2018 #1
The OP cites explicit examples Uncle Joe Aug 2018 #3
Yes, he's "speaking about the American Peoples' savings" but giving precious little detail about.... George II Aug 2018 #10
Using BERNIE'S PLAN, even the Mercatus report reflected two trillion dollars in savings, Uncle Joe Aug 2018 #13
Has this plan been adopted in Vermont yet? Gothmog Aug 2018 #17
Forest and the trees. Uncle Joe Aug 2018 #25
Again if sanders has a magical plan then get it adopted in Vermont Gothmog Aug 2018 #29
Bernie is one of Vermont's U.S. Senators not the Governor of that fine state. Uncle Joe Aug 2018 #39
Actually, his refusal to talk about Green Mountain Care's failure, and possible lessons learned ehrnst Aug 2018 #31
Vermont is not an island in the ocean and has a small population to boot, it's not even a Uncle Joe Aug 2018 #48
Gothmog has a good point. The desire to stick to Hortensis Aug 2018 #23
When Bernie was citing two trillion dollars in savings for the American People listed in the Uncle Joe Aug 2018 #36
Trump and Sanders BOTH promised BETTER healthcare Hortensis Aug 2018 #41
"National" healthcare? Uncle Joe Aug 2018 #46
Sanders needs to break that BOTH by producing a plan Hortensis Aug 2018 #50
It's not a static world Hortensis what can't be achieved today can very well be done Uncle Joe Aug 2018 #51
From the Mercatus report: ehrnst Aug 2018 #34
Bernie's PLAN isn't a law yet dansolo Aug 2018 #81
It's a bill and Blahous of the Koch funded Mercatus Center based his findings Uncle Joe Aug 2018 #82
that expenditure cut is based on a huge assumption: JHan Aug 2018 #35
++++++ brer cat Aug 2018 #77
I trust CNN and the other fact checkers Gothmog Aug 2018 #2
I trust the facts Uncle Joe Aug 2018 #5
So do I, which is why I trust Tapper Gothmog Aug 2018 #15
Did you listen to your own video Tapper either begins misleading or lies at about Uncle Joe Aug 2018 #19
I both listened to it and I actually understood it Gothmog Aug 2018 #20
Do you believe "government" and the "American People" are the same thing in regards to this issue? Uncle Joe Aug 2018 #22
LOL-so when will we hear about Vermont adopting this plan? Gothmog Aug 2018 #24
Who pays for the 20% of medical bills that Medicare doesn't cover? It only covers 80% brush Aug 2018 #42
Who pays for the bills that the uninsured leave at the emergency room doorstep? Uncle Joe Aug 2018 #44
I'm asking a serious question. If you don't know if Medicare for all pays for it just say so. brush Aug 2018 #45
My questions were quite serious, I suspect you know who pays for it. Uncle Joe Aug 2018 #47
I don't know. It's a simple question. People with Medicare have to pay the 20%. brush Aug 2018 #55
I understand there is a detailed plan, but have yet to see it ehrnst Aug 2018 #63
I just posted the relevant paragraph, the plan does. Uncle Joe Aug 2018 #68
maybe not Kurt V. Aug 2018 #27
Got anything on factcheck.org? ehrnst Aug 2018 #38
Except when they dispute something that Sanders says. (nt) ehrnst Aug 2018 #32
so now anyone who disagrees with Sanders is wrong.. JHan Aug 2018 #4
Do you have any rebuttals to the actual OP's points of contention? Uncle Joe Aug 2018 #6
I did. JHan Aug 2018 #11
"mainstream fact checkers are wrong" ehrnst Aug 2018 #33
exactly. JHan Aug 2018 #37
It is almost as if someone WANTS universal to fail, ultimately. Or that it should be Eliot Rosewater Aug 2018 #28
I was under the assumption that Sanders' bill was conceptual in nature with very few.... George II Aug 2018 #7
It's more than conceptual if you want more specifics Uncle Joe Aug 2018 #12
The specifics have been analyzed by independent, non-partisan think tanks. ehrnst Aug 2018 #30
The author makes assumptions on what the medical community will or won't do and from whence does he Uncle Joe Aug 2018 #40
Here's a video of Tapper changing Bernie and Alexandria's claim but don't believe your own eyes Uncle Joe Aug 2018 #8
Here is what Ricardo Alonzo-Zaldivar from AP has to say about the Mercatus Center paper: George II Aug 2018 #18
... NurseJackie Aug 2018 #9
... Uncle Joe Aug 2018 #14
Yes, Jacobin, that shining beacon of objective political analysis.. ehrnst Aug 2018 #16
Gothmog's video on post # 15 supports at least one of Jacobin's contentions Uncle Joe Aug 2018 #21
Splitting hairs on one phrase. ehrnst Aug 2018 #26
Bernie said "that wasn't what the study intended to do but it was in the study" Uncle Joe Aug 2018 #43
Not really Gothmog Aug 2018 #76
Who is this person? Gothmog Aug 2018 #49
The writer for Jacobin appears to lack an editor. lapucelle Aug 2018 #53
Jacobin? Again? lapucelle Aug 2018 #52
Politifact is wrong what Bernie said is true Uncle Joe Aug 2018 #54
In only one of two possible, equally likely scenarios. lapucelle Aug 2018 #56
I'll believe factcheck.org and/or Politifact over any politician when they disagree. ehrnst Aug 2018 #57
Are they not human as well? Uncle Joe Aug 2018 #59
Is Tapper working for factcheck.org and Politifact now? ehrnst Aug 2018 #61
It was half true because it was only one of two possible scenarios. lapucelle Aug 2018 #58
But according to Jacobin, Politifact is in cahoots with Mercatus to get Bernie! ehrnst Aug 2018 #74
Not in the real world Gothmog Aug 2018 #75
Now that's a statement I would expect to see from a Trump supporter. ehrnst Aug 2018 #60
Which statement? Uncle Joe Aug 2018 #62
The title of your OP. (nt) ehrnst Aug 2018 #64
And the substance of the article refers to the "fact checkers' and backs up it's assertions. Uncle Joe Aug 2018 #65
I have yet to see factcheck.org or Politifact retract. ehrnst Aug 2018 #66
Well the OP is primarily about Tapper but there were other segments Uncle Joe Aug 2018 #67
"media doing the same knee jerk or premeditated misleading." ehrnst Aug 2018 #69
This isn't a tweet! The Medicare for All Bill, Mercatus report, Bernie's truthful response, Uncle Joe Aug 2018 #70
Fact checking is fact checking, and you posted an article that accuses ehrnst Aug 2018 #71
Fact checking IS fact checking, that's the point, so we're checking the facts of the fact checkers Uncle Joe Aug 2018 #72
When you post conspiracy theory worthy, unsubstantiated claims about the free press ehrnst Aug 2018 #73
The fact checkers based their assumptions on a faulty premise Uncle Joe Aug 2018 #78
Because Jacobin says so? ehrnst Aug 2018 #115
I believe you and I have used many of the same posts over the course of our debates Uncle Joe Aug 2018 #117
I think that your citing of that Jacobin article says much about ehrnst Aug 2018 #118
I've cited Sach's analysis on CNN as well but you have yet to respond to his article Uncle Joe Aug 2018 #120
Your very OP concerns the Mercatus study, and the fact checking of Bernie's claims about it. ehrnst Aug 2018 #121
I can just re post this because the same answer applies Uncle Joe Aug 2018 #123
..... ehrnst Aug 2018 #124
What are the "self corrected fact checks" lapucelle Aug 2018 #79
Well there is Kessler at the Washington Post Uncle Joe Aug 2018 #80
Sanders clearly didn't contact Blahous before making his statement on the study. ehrnst Aug 2018 #83
I have a feeling that talking points were rolled out based on a superficial reading lapucelle Aug 2018 #86
I know that it was featured in an email campaign for donations. ehrnst Aug 2018 #91
That's Blahous' opinion NOT based on the requirements of the BILL it's just an Uncle Joe Aug 2018 #94
From Blahous: ehrnst Aug 2018 #105
Still no answer to Jeffrey Sachs' criticism of Blahous' study. Uncle Joe Aug 2018 #111
Still no answer to how the author of the study is not credible enough to understand ehrnst Aug 2018 #113
Kessler still gives BS's claim 3 Pinnochios. lapucelle Aug 2018 #84
Stop it with the FACTS, will you?? ehrnst Aug 2018 #85
... lapucelle Aug 2018 #87
Why use the word "cherry picked" when citing the results of study of the actual BILL. Uncle Joe Aug 2018 #88
"So why should Bernie or anyone else cite that as it's not based on reality? " ehrnst Aug 2018 #89
A common sense example of what BS did in his big announcement lapucelle Aug 2018 #93
Bingo. (nt) ehrnst Aug 2018 #95
More like this Blahous example of his report. Uncle Joe Aug 2018 #97
No, that's really stretching it. ehrnst Aug 2018 #102
There were two aspects of this report one pertaining to the ACTUAL bill which reflects savings of Uncle Joe Aug 2018 #96
"based on an alternate reality not based on the bill" ehrnst Aug 2018 #103
There are KNOWN aspects of the bill to which Blahous chose to ignore in his second scenario Uncle Joe Aug 2018 #108
Not very many known aspects of the funding mechanism... ehrnst Aug 2018 #109
Provider payment rates in Sanders's plan are not "assumptions" Uncle Joe Aug 2018 #112
This does not address the fact that Sanders did not accurately represent ehrnst Aug 2018 #114
Because only one of two possibilities was acknowleged. lapucelle Aug 2018 #90
As the author said, Sanders chose a number presented as "unlikely" according to the study. ehrnst Aug 2018 #92
Bernie chose the number from the grading of his actual bill and what about this? Uncle Joe Aug 2018 #99
So you don't think that he understood the data in his study? ehrnst Aug 2018 #100
I just presented evidence from economist Jeffrey Sachs stating of at least three major dynamics not Uncle Joe Aug 2018 #106
And I presented to you Blahous' statement on the conclusions that were not supported by his study. ehrnst Aug 2018 #110
Blahous' study is not out of line with some mainstream economists Uncle Joe Aug 2018 #116
The main issue you have is that he did an analysis "based on the actual bill" ehrnst Aug 2018 #119
Bernie was pointing to "An Inconvenient Truth" WITHIN the study because he believed Uncle Joe Aug 2018 #122
The only possibility based in the real world was the analysis of the actual BILL not Uncle Joe Aug 2018 #98
So he's not "competent enough" to come up with a scenario that proves Bernie's numbers... ehrnst Aug 2018 #101
Because the BS bill has no funding provisions lapucelle Aug 2018 #104
Indeed. Bernie's own projections are not as fleshed out, and he is not a policy analyst. ehrnst Aug 2018 #107
The study was purely binary, Bernie has wisely proposed a whole range of funding options and Uncle Joe Aug 2018 #126
Kick ck4829 Aug 2018 #125
Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»The Fact-Checkers Are Clu...»Reply #14