Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

frazzled

(18,402 posts)
2. Because ...
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 12:34 PM
Feb 2014

it would have given the idiot O'Reilly MORE credibility had Obama refused a Superbowl interview ... something that, for better or worse, has become something of a tradition in recent years.

Imagine had Obama refused to be interview on the network that was airing the Superbowl. It would have provided months worth of fodder for how aloof/timid/unleader-like, etc. he is.

Obama did the right thing: show up and endure it. If he can't endure an interview with an adversarial tv show host, how can he be expected to endure negotiations with an adversarial government such as Iran's? That's who Obama is: he talks to his "enemies." He isn't threatened. Why are you?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»The Cheapening of America...»Reply #2