Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gothmog

(179,906 posts)
5. Agreed but the DOJ has a better case right now in Texas
Fri Aug 30, 2013, 01:28 PM
Aug 2013

The Texas voter is law is being enforced right now in an election in South Texas. There are statewide elections on constitutional amendments and a City of Houston mayor's race in November. The DOJ has the benefit of some good language from the DC circuit on the Texas voter id law and needed to move right now on that law. I have no doubt that the North Carolina law will be challenged by the DOJ but right now the Texas law is already stealing the vote from voters.

The provisions of the North Carolina law other than the voter id provisions require proof of intentional discrimination by the GOP which is hard to do. In Texas, we have an idiot Attorney General who has admitted that the purpose of the Texas redistricting and the Texas voter id law was to punish Democrats. These statements go a long way to proving intentional discrimination.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»North Carolina»Hagan Asks US Attorney Ge...»Reply #5