Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

North Carolina

rdharma

(6,057 posts)

9. Article 6, section 8 was in effect nullified....

Reply to barbtries (Original post)

Sun Dec 15, 2013, 06:10 PM

Dec 2013

By the US Supreme Court in 1961 (Torcaso v. Watkins 376 US 488).

NC can't require a "religious test" for office even if they have retained that provision in the NC constitution.

Federal law trumps state law (especially when the state law is unconstitutional).

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

16 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

thanks to my son i just learned something interesting. [View all] barbtries Dec 2013 OP

Why hasn't that been challenged in court? nt Ilsa Dec 2013 #1

i'm going to guess barbtries Dec 2013 #6

Running for office or hold office, barbtries? enlightenment Dec 2013 #2

i don't know. barbtries Dec 2013 #5

i suppose they can run for office all day long, barbtries Dec 2013 #7

They are absurd laws, to be sure. enlightenment Dec 2013 #11

interesting concept. barbtries Dec 2013 #12

True. enlightenment Dec 2013 #15

. . . Triana Dec 2013 #3

Not precisely true aristocles Dec 2013 #4

okay. barbtries Dec 2013 #8

Article 6, section 8 was in effect nullified.... rdharma Dec 2013 #9

then i wonder why it's still on the books. barbtries Dec 2013 #10

Because it would have to be removed by a vote of the people of NC. rdharma Dec 2013 #14

right barbtries Dec 2013 #16

Interesting aristocles Dec 2013 #13