Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Economy
In reply to the discussion: Weekend Economists Ring in the Old, Wring Out the New: Dec. 30, 2011 to Jan. 2, 2012 [View all]Demeter
(85,373 posts)117. Balancing Act
http://www.utne.com/Mind-Body/Work-Life-Balance-Low-Wage-Workers.aspx#ixzz1hBJV7tcO
A small group of Chicago clothing retailers is challenging convention by offering their low-wage, mostly part-time workers a list of perks normally reserved for management: flexible hours, time off when needed, and a locked-in schedule of shifts that allows workers to plan a full month, rather than a few days, in advance.
If researchers are correct, higher worker satisfaction at those stores will boost employee morale, retention rates, and productivity, pushing labor costs down and revenues up. Meanwhile, employees will report reduced stress, better physical and mental heath, and stronger relationships with family and friends.
Its really a win-win, says Susan Lambert, an associate professor at the University of Chicagos School of Social Service Administration. Lambert is among a handful of people exploring one of the most overlooked areas of labor policy: work-life balance at the bottom of the pay scale.
The flexible workplace benefits the professional class often takes for grantedmaternity and sick leave, time off for family emergencies, control over work schedules, telecommutingrarely trickle down the pay ladder. Yet studies show that workers at or near minimum wage are most in need of such benefits. The working poor are more likely to hold down multiple jobs, have greater health care needs, be single parents and caregivers, and have difficulty commuting to their jobs.
While much attention in recent years has focused on minimum wage and so-called living-wage legislation, experts argue that actual wages are less important than the work schedule...
A small group of Chicago clothing retailers is challenging convention by offering their low-wage, mostly part-time workers a list of perks normally reserved for management: flexible hours, time off when needed, and a locked-in schedule of shifts that allows workers to plan a full month, rather than a few days, in advance.
If researchers are correct, higher worker satisfaction at those stores will boost employee morale, retention rates, and productivity, pushing labor costs down and revenues up. Meanwhile, employees will report reduced stress, better physical and mental heath, and stronger relationships with family and friends.
Its really a win-win, says Susan Lambert, an associate professor at the University of Chicagos School of Social Service Administration. Lambert is among a handful of people exploring one of the most overlooked areas of labor policy: work-life balance at the bottom of the pay scale.
The flexible workplace benefits the professional class often takes for grantedmaternity and sick leave, time off for family emergencies, control over work schedules, telecommutingrarely trickle down the pay ladder. Yet studies show that workers at or near minimum wage are most in need of such benefits. The working poor are more likely to hold down multiple jobs, have greater health care needs, be single parents and caregivers, and have difficulty commuting to their jobs.
While much attention in recent years has focused on minimum wage and so-called living-wage legislation, experts argue that actual wages are less important than the work schedule...
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
150 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Weekend Economists Ring in the Old, Wring Out the New: Dec. 30, 2011 to Jan. 2, 2012 [View all]
Demeter
Dec 2011
OP
Put the the bazooka to the transitory unintended consequences from black swan events
Po_d Mainiac
Dec 2011
#10
Krugman is -- and has been -- ivory towered and out of touch for a long time n/t
Tansy_Gold
Dec 2011
#70
Leasing Through the Back Door: The Private Financing of “Public” Prisons By Christopher Petrella
Demeter
Dec 2011
#73
Cities that broke up Occupy camps now face lawsuits over free speech, use of force
Demeter
Jan 2012
#84
Populism Isn't Dead, It's Marching: What 19th Century Farmers Can Teach Occupiers About How to Keep
Demeter
Jan 2012
#116
"We’ve got to change it all, and we’ve got to do it before the ice caps melt"
bread_and_roses
Jan 2012
#132
Lies, Damn Lies And The Four Whoppers Of 2011 (Jonathan Alter is a Bloomberg View columnist)
Demeter
Jan 2012
#99
How Germany Builds Twice as Many Cars as the U.S. While Paying Its Workers Twice as Much
Demeter
Jan 2012
#100
Goodbye "Shop Til You Drop" Mentality: Renegade Band of Economists Call for "Degrowth" Economy
Demeter
Jan 2012
#101
I REPEAT: The original purpose of the Postal Service was to Deliver Democracy!
Demeter
Jan 2012
#108
"The Protester" Becomes Time's Person of the Year, Wants More by: J.A. Myerson, Truthout
Demeter
Jan 2012
#120
What if the SEC investigated Banks the way it is investigating Mutual Funds? By William K. Black
Demeter
Jan 2012
#126
Firefox has completely stopped working...again, and screwed up the machine doing it
Demeter
Jan 2012
#135
GENERAL, OFF-TOPIC QUERY: What has changed so much on DU that it feels like a foreign land?
Demeter
Jan 2012
#140
The Number One Catastrophic Event That Americans Worry About: Economic Collapse
Demeter
Jan 2012
#143
Michael Olenick: Is Shadow Housing Inventory Vastly Larger Than Widely Believed?
Demeter
Jan 2012
#146