Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Economy
In reply to the discussion: STOCK MARKET WATCH -- Monday, 22 April 2013 -- Earth Day [View all]xchrom
(108,903 posts)19. The end of macro magic
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/robert-samuelson-the-end-of-macroeconomics-magic/2013/04/21/7408d628-a924-11e2-a8e2-5b98cb59187f_story.html
The International Monetary Fund recently held a conference that should concern most people despite its arcane subject Rethinking Macro Policy II. Macroeconomics is the study of the entire economy, as opposed to the examination of individual markets (microeconomics). The question is how much macro policies can produce and protect prosperity. Before the 2008-09 financial crisis, there was great confidence that they could. Now, with 38 million unemployed in Europe and the United States and recoveries that are feeble or nonexistent macroeconomics is in disarray and disrepute.
Among economists, there is no consensus on policies. Is austerity (government spending cuts and tax increases) self-defeating or the unavoidable response to high budget deficits and debt? Can central banks such as the Federal Reserve or the European Central Bank engineer recovery by holding short-term interest rates near zero and by buying massive amounts of bonds (so-called quantitative easing)? Or will these policies foster financial speculation, instability and inflation? The public is confused, because economists are divided.
Perhaps the anti-economist backlash has gone too far, as George Akerlof, a Nobel Prize-winning economist, argued. The world, he said, avoided a second Great Depression. We economists have not done a good job explaining that our macro policies worked, he said. Those policies included: the Feds support for panic-stricken financial markets; economic stimulus packages; the Troubled Assets Relief Program (TARP); the auto bailout; stress tests for banks; international cooperation to augment demand.
Fair point. Still, the subsequent record is disheartening. The economic models that didnt predict the crisis have also repeatedly overstated the recovery. The tendency is to blame errors on one-time events say, in 2011, the Japanese tsunami, the Greek bailout and the divisive congressional debate over the debt ceiling. But the larger cause seems to be the models themselves, which reflect spending patterns and behavior by households and businesses since World War II.
The International Monetary Fund recently held a conference that should concern most people despite its arcane subject Rethinking Macro Policy II. Macroeconomics is the study of the entire economy, as opposed to the examination of individual markets (microeconomics). The question is how much macro policies can produce and protect prosperity. Before the 2008-09 financial crisis, there was great confidence that they could. Now, with 38 million unemployed in Europe and the United States and recoveries that are feeble or nonexistent macroeconomics is in disarray and disrepute.
Among economists, there is no consensus on policies. Is austerity (government spending cuts and tax increases) self-defeating or the unavoidable response to high budget deficits and debt? Can central banks such as the Federal Reserve or the European Central Bank engineer recovery by holding short-term interest rates near zero and by buying massive amounts of bonds (so-called quantitative easing)? Or will these policies foster financial speculation, instability and inflation? The public is confused, because economists are divided.
Perhaps the anti-economist backlash has gone too far, as George Akerlof, a Nobel Prize-winning economist, argued. The world, he said, avoided a second Great Depression. We economists have not done a good job explaining that our macro policies worked, he said. Those policies included: the Feds support for panic-stricken financial markets; economic stimulus packages; the Troubled Assets Relief Program (TARP); the auto bailout; stress tests for banks; international cooperation to augment demand.
Fair point. Still, the subsequent record is disheartening. The economic models that didnt predict the crisis have also repeatedly overstated the recovery. The tendency is to blame errors on one-time events say, in 2011, the Japanese tsunami, the Greek bailout and the divisive congressional debate over the debt ceiling. But the larger cause seems to be the models themselves, which reflect spending patterns and behavior by households and businesses since World War II.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
34 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Another Giveaway to the Banksters: Obama, Housing and the Next Big Heist By Mike Whitney
Demeter
Apr 2013
#4
From the "We don't care if we're ass backwards wrong! We're standing by it" Department.
Fuddnik
Apr 2013
#7
GOOD NEWS ANTIDOTES: Worker-Owned Cooperatives: Direct Democracy in Action By David Morgan
Demeter
Apr 2013
#9
Remaking the Federal Reserve, Building Public Banks and Opting Out of Wall Street
Demeter
Apr 2013
#11
Create Finance System That Serves Public, Part I: Shrink, Regulate Banks, and Enforce Law
Demeter
Apr 2013
#14
Well, the stupid "drug testing for welfare" meme is flying over the social networking sites... AGAIN
Hugin
Apr 2013
#16
The youngers cannot play that game no $$$, no future, a lot of us oldsters won't..
kickysnana
Apr 2013
#26