Economy
In reply to the discussion: STOCK MARKET WATCH -- Friday, 5 July 2013 [View all]Demeter
(85,373 posts)JOIN THE CLUB, DR. KRUGMAN. YOU TOO CAN BE A JEWISH MOTHER....
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/07/03/nobody-pays-any-attention-to-what-i-say/
Or thats what people keep telling me. Actually, one of the odd but revealing things about modern conservatives is the way they alternate between paranoia about the vast left-wing conspiracy and insistence that people who disagree with them are part of a tiny fringe with no real following. Joe Scarborough thinks (or thought has he updated?) that I was all alone in questioning deficit panic; the fairly large anti-me industry has been insisting for around a decade that Ive lost all credibility except among credulous New York liberals.
So, on the general principle that if I am not for myself, who will be for me: that left-wing rag the Wall Street Journal has a new assessment, based on some supposedly objective criteria (but not including Twitter followers) of the most influential business thinkers. They see a big change since the last time they did this, five years ago. Back then, business strategy gurus authors of books on reengineering the search for excellence in the total quality six-sigma chaos, and all that dominated the list. This time, the top thinkers are:
1.Paul Krugman
2. Joseph Stiglitz
3. Bill Gates
4. Michael Porter
5. Thomas Friedman
6. Eric Schmidt
7. Richard Branson
8. Malcolm Gladwell
9. Robert Reich
10. Jack Welch
11. Muhammad Yunus
12. Niall Ferguson
13. Michael Dell
14. Howard Gardner
15. Jimmy Wales
Let me say, the fact that Joe Stiglitz is up there makes me more optimistic about the world; as Ive written in the past, hes an insanely great economist, in ways that you really cant comprehend unless you do economic modeling, but until now I would never have envisioned him having the kind of reach he now does.
Something else, which the WSJ doesnt emphasize, is that the list isnt just heavy on economists; its heavy on liberal economists. I dont think thats an accident, and I dont think its purely political. The fact is that in an era of markets gone massively bad, conservative economists dont have much to offer except excuses.
Obviously its not completely one-sided; going down the list a bit further I see proof that PT Barnum was right. But still, iinteresting.
I SUPPOSE HE MEANS FRIEDMAN, AND JACK WELCH...