Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Economy
In reply to the discussion: STOCK MARKET WATCH -- Friday, 5 July 2013 [View all]Demeter
(85,373 posts)25. Likonomics: what's not to like; Stimulus v reform in China
http://www.economist.com/blogs/freeexchange/2013/07/stimulus-v-reform-china
JAPAN is still enjoying the effects of Abenomics, a campaign to reflate the economy named after Shinzo Abe, the prime minister. (The campaign stopped consumer prices, excluding fresh food, falling in the year to May.) China, on the other hand, is now enduring the effects of something called "Likonomics".
Pronounced lee-conomics, the term has nothing to do with Facebook's economy of endorsements. It refers instead to the emerging doctrine of Li Keqiang, China's prime minister, who has overseen the country's economy since March. The term was coined on June 27th by three economists at Barclays Capital: Yiping Huang, Jian Chang and Joey Chew.
Like the three "arrows" of Abenomics, Mr Li's strategy comprises three parts, they argue. Unlike the arrows of Abenomics, however, all of them hurt.
Likonomics stands for:
1. No stimulus. Whereas Abenomics embraces both monetary and fiscal stimulus, Likonomics champions neither. In a bracing speech to officials on May 13th, Mr Li argued that China had little scope for stimulus or government-directed investment. In China, like the United States, stimulus is now a dirty word. But it fell into disrepute for opposite reasons. In America, stimulus failed to win favour because it was too small. In China the post-crisis stimulus was discredited because it was too big.
2. Deleveraging. In China, credit, broadly defined, has been growing much faster than GDP. The stock of "total-social financing", an eclectic measure of loans, corporate bonds and a bit of equity financing, is now about 190% of GDP. Mr Li is committed to lowering this ratio, according to the Barclays economists, who cite last month's alarming cash crunch in the interbank market as evidence.
3. Structural reform. Mr Li talks a lot about the need for structural reform. "Reform is 'the biggest dividend' for China," he has said. At a May meeting of the State Council, China's cabinet, he outlined many worthwhile initiatives, from liberalising interest rates to raising utility prices. The hope is that he will flesh out these proposals at a big communist-party meeting in the autumn (the third plenum of the central committee of the Chinese Communist Party).
There is a lot to like about Likonomics, especially its third arrow. But I have some qualms about it. In particular, I worry that it reflects the growing influence of China's "pain caucus"...
JAPAN is still enjoying the effects of Abenomics, a campaign to reflate the economy named after Shinzo Abe, the prime minister. (The campaign stopped consumer prices, excluding fresh food, falling in the year to May.) China, on the other hand, is now enduring the effects of something called "Likonomics".
Pronounced lee-conomics, the term has nothing to do with Facebook's economy of endorsements. It refers instead to the emerging doctrine of Li Keqiang, China's prime minister, who has overseen the country's economy since March. The term was coined on June 27th by three economists at Barclays Capital: Yiping Huang, Jian Chang and Joey Chew.
Like the three "arrows" of Abenomics, Mr Li's strategy comprises three parts, they argue. Unlike the arrows of Abenomics, however, all of them hurt.
Likonomics stands for:
1. No stimulus. Whereas Abenomics embraces both monetary and fiscal stimulus, Likonomics champions neither. In a bracing speech to officials on May 13th, Mr Li argued that China had little scope for stimulus or government-directed investment. In China, like the United States, stimulus is now a dirty word. But it fell into disrepute for opposite reasons. In America, stimulus failed to win favour because it was too small. In China the post-crisis stimulus was discredited because it was too big.
2. Deleveraging. In China, credit, broadly defined, has been growing much faster than GDP. The stock of "total-social financing", an eclectic measure of loans, corporate bonds and a bit of equity financing, is now about 190% of GDP. Mr Li is committed to lowering this ratio, according to the Barclays economists, who cite last month's alarming cash crunch in the interbank market as evidence.
3. Structural reform. Mr Li talks a lot about the need for structural reform. "Reform is 'the biggest dividend' for China," he has said. At a May meeting of the State Council, China's cabinet, he outlined many worthwhile initiatives, from liberalising interest rates to raising utility prices. The hope is that he will flesh out these proposals at a big communist-party meeting in the autumn (the third plenum of the central committee of the Chinese Communist Party).
There is a lot to like about Likonomics, especially its third arrow. But I have some qualms about it. In particular, I worry that it reflects the growing influence of China's "pain caucus"...
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
46 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I thought Republicans were all defending the NSA and leading the charge to vilify Snowden
tclambert
Jul 2013
#14
How Unreasonable Searches of Private Documents Caused the American Revolution JUAN COLE
Demeter
Jul 2013
#3
Europe Says Trade Talks With US To Start Monday Despite Concerns Over Spy Claims
Demeter
Jul 2013
#8