Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Economy
In reply to the discussion: Weekend Economists Deck the Halls Christmas Day 2013 [View all]Demeter
(85,373 posts)14. America’s Shopper-in-Chief Has His Staff Sign Him Up for ObamaCare (But Not His Family)
http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2013/12/americas-shopper-chief-staff-sign-obamacare-family.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+NakedCapitalism+%28naked+capitalism%29
And in a genius PR move, the White House describes Obamas act of successful shopping avoidance as symbolic. As indeed it is, although not in the way the White House thinks, or could be said to think. WaPo has the details:
The Bronze? The metal for losers who can barely scrape together the meagre coin to avoid being forced onto Medicaid? WTF?
My Canadian friends tell me that in Canada they have a single payer plan up there that covers everybody; they call it Medicare medical services that are covered by Medicare cannot be covered privately (leaving profit-mongers to sell cosmetic surgery, for example, to the wealthy, and a very fine thing that is, too). That way, the Canadian Prime Minister and the lowliest prole all have the same incentive to make Medicare work well; they all have the same skin in the game; their own.
But Obama, as you see, has no skin in the game at all; not himself, and not his family. Yet oddly, or not, Obama places great emphasis on others having skin in the game. (Troll prophylactic: Before anybody raises the argument that Obama couldnt legally go on the Federal Exchange, or wasnt eligible for the exchange because of income, remember that Obamas the same guy who whacked a U.S. citizen with a drone strike without due process. Lets also remember that ObamaCare is a hot mess of triaged requirements, slipped statutory deadlines, abandoned mandates, and rewritten regulations that reinterpret the law so loosey-goose-ily that the law might as well have been a ginormous stack of This page intentionally left blanks. In short, if Obama had wanted to put himself and his family on his wonderful Exchanges, like the rest of us, he could have. Lets not kid ourselves here.*)
Ha ha. How I wish I had staff! And if the DC Exchange was really crash-proof, do you really imagine that the White House PR operation would have passed up the chance to make a YouTube of tech savvy Obama signing up on his own laptop from the Oval Office? And then propagating the YouTube to the young invincibles? No way. No, instead the White House operation has the staff go over the weekend, and then releases the news of our glorious leaders enrollment on Monday of Christmas week, which is about the same as burying it at 5:00 on Friday.
But let us pass on from the pleasant duty of calling bullshit on Obamas imperial prerogatives, which let him slide out from under the shopping experience hes mandated for the rest of us at least, those of us without staff because theres a larger point that Id like to approach by way of example. Let us pass on, that is, from the airing of the grievances to the feats of strength. Heres a report from the field (hat tip, BC) of one person trying to work the Federal Exchange in Missouri with the help of a Navigator:
Shop til you drop! And now the key point:
In other words, ObamaCare is optimized for shoppers; thats really what what patience, persistence headline means when you think in systemic, as opposed to characterological, terms. In fact, given that statistically at least, lives are at stake, we might consider the ObamaCare marketplace as a Darwinian environment where those who do not display adaptability to the shopping environment I hate shopping, since its a massive time sink are more likely not to get the health care they need, and hence more likely to get sick, and hence more likely to die; some people call that a nudge, but Id call it more like shooting the wounded. Because and this is the most important point the neoliberal market solution is always about that truly transcendent human endeavor shopping isnt it? Supposing for the moment that we consider the non-elite human, of course. As Corey Robin wrote (quoted by Yves):
As did Jeannie Wyble, thereby giving productive employment, except not, to Aaron Swaney.
And so do Preznits!
If ObamaCare is permitted to entrench itself, the next step will be to have a Retirement Marketplace, with Social Security as the public option, so that the rentiers can run the 401(k) scam a second time for more fees, because shopping.*** Does anybody really believe that wont happen?
Thats not a bug. Its a feature.
Indeed. A social order where the rich have staff to do their shopping for them, Presidents slide out from under the mandate to shop that they impose on others, and the rest of us Well, heres what were expected to do:
Were mandated to keep that tapeworm fat, happy, and well-fed. By shopping for a defective product with time we have to steal from what wed really rather be doing than shopping for insurance, and that means almost anything. The Canadians dont have to crap around with any of this. Why should we? Bush famously said I encourage you all to go shopping more. Leave it to Obama, not to encourage, but force us to shop!
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTE * If I elected, my family and I will purchase health insurance on the exchanges together would be a great campaign promise for a populist campaign, especially when followed by until such time as we pass Medicare for All, which I expect to do in my first term. Bernie? Brian? No, not you, Elizabeth.
NOTE ** Theres also the argument that Obama would have had difficulty signing up because of Experians identity validation software might not have been able to handle his special case. Really? So have Obama get on the phone with support, like the rest of us. Symbolism, ya know. Symbolism. And dont tell me he doesnt have time; hes on his way to a vacation in Hawaii!
NOTE *** We might consider making the experiment of mentally replacing because free markets or because liberty, when encountered, with because shopping. Could be interesting!
NOTE The Republican reaction is priceless:
Im glad he did it, Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) said in an interview Monday. Im not going to take a cheap shot at him for signing up. . [It's a tough job, but somebody has to do it!] Chaffetz added: Hes the president of the United States. His health care is a little different than the rest of us.
Not in Canada!
And in a genius PR move, the White House describes Obamas act of successful shopping avoidance as symbolic. As indeed it is, although not in the way the White House thinks, or could be said to think. WaPo has the details:
President Obama has enrolled in the federal health-care insurance exchanges, selecting a bronze-tiered insurance plan on the D.C. marketplace, the White House announced Monday.
The Bronze? The metal for losers who can barely scrape together the meagre coin to avoid being forced onto Medicaid? WTF?
The presidents health care will continue to be provided by the military, according to a statement distributed to reporters from a White House official who demanded anonymity.
My Canadian friends tell me that in Canada they have a single payer plan up there that covers everybody; they call it Medicare medical services that are covered by Medicare cannot be covered privately (leaving profit-mongers to sell cosmetic surgery, for example, to the wealthy, and a very fine thing that is, too). That way, the Canadian Prime Minister and the lowliest prole all have the same incentive to make Medicare work well; they all have the same skin in the game; their own.
Obamas premium will be less than $400 a month, but it only covers himself, not his wife, Michelle, nor their daughters, Malia and Sasha, according to a White House official.
But Obama, as you see, has no skin in the game at all; not himself, and not his family. Yet oddly, or not, Obama places great emphasis on others having skin in the game. (Troll prophylactic: Before anybody raises the argument that Obama couldnt legally go on the Federal Exchange, or wasnt eligible for the exchange because of income, remember that Obamas the same guy who whacked a U.S. citizen with a drone strike without due process. Lets also remember that ObamaCare is a hot mess of triaged requirements, slipped statutory deadlines, abandoned mandates, and rewritten regulations that reinterpret the law so loosey-goose-ily that the law might as well have been a ginormous stack of This page intentionally left blanks. In short, if Obama had wanted to put himself and his family on his wonderful Exchanges, like the rest of us, he could have. Lets not kid ourselves here.*)
Although Obama was involved in selecting a plan, he didnt sign up himself. The presidents staff did that for him, going in person to the D.C. exchange over the weekend, the White House official said.**
Ha ha. How I wish I had staff! And if the DC Exchange was really crash-proof, do you really imagine that the White House PR operation would have passed up the chance to make a YouTube of tech savvy Obama signing up on his own laptop from the Oval Office? And then propagating the YouTube to the young invincibles? No way. No, instead the White House operation has the staff go over the weekend, and then releases the news of our glorious leaders enrollment on Monday of Christmas week, which is about the same as burying it at 5:00 on Friday.
But let us pass on from the pleasant duty of calling bullshit on Obamas imperial prerogatives, which let him slide out from under the shopping experience hes mandated for the rest of us at least, those of us without staff because theres a larger point that Id like to approach by way of example. Let us pass on, that is, from the airing of the grievances to the feats of strength. Heres a report from the field (hat tip, BC) of one person trying to work the Federal Exchange in Missouri with the help of a Navigator:
Success with HealthCare.gov takes patience, persistence
Aaron Swaney, the certified application counselor [Navigator] based out of the Family Health Center, first helped [Jeannie Wyble] make an account on the marketplace on Nov. 15. By the second of week of December, her account still says in progress. They made another appointment to see each other the next day, hoping the sixth time would be the charm.
Aaron Swaney, the certified application counselor [Navigator] based out of the Family Health Center, first helped [Jeannie Wyble] make an account on the marketplace on Nov. 15. By the second of week of December, her account still says in progress. They made another appointment to see each other the next day, hoping the sixth time would be the charm.
Shop til you drop! And now the key point:
Jeremy Milarsky, who, like Swaney, has been certified to help consumers enroll on HealthCare.gov, sums up the situation:
This is a system that lends itself very well to people who are organized and follow up. If youre the kind of person who just sits back and expect everything to fall into place (as, for example, with Canadian-style single payer Medicare for all) youre more likely to run into problems.
This is a system that lends itself very well to people who are organized and follow up. If youre the kind of person who just sits back and expect everything to fall into place (as, for example, with Canadian-style single payer Medicare for all) youre more likely to run into problems.
In other words, ObamaCare is optimized for shoppers; thats really what what patience, persistence headline means when you think in systemic, as opposed to characterological, terms. In fact, given that statistically at least, lives are at stake, we might consider the ObamaCare marketplace as a Darwinian environment where those who do not display adaptability to the shopping environment I hate shopping, since its a massive time sink are more likely not to get the health care they need, and hence more likely to get sick, and hence more likely to die; some people call that a nudge, but Id call it more like shooting the wounded. Because and this is the most important point the neoliberal market solution is always about that truly transcendent human endeavor shopping isnt it? Supposing for the moment that we consider the non-elite human, of course. As Corey Robin wrote (quoted by Yves):
In the neoliberal utopia, all of us are forced to spend an inordinate amount of time keeping track of each and every facet of our economic lives.
As did Jeannie Wyble, thereby giving productive employment, except not, to Aaron Swaney.
That, in fact, is the openly declared goal: once we are made more cognizant of our money, where it comes from and where it goes, neoliberals believe well be more responsible in spending and investing it. Of course, rich people have accountants, lawyers, personal assistants, and others to do this for them, so the argument doesnt apply to them, but thats another story for another day.
And so do Preznits!
The dream is that wed all have our gazillion individual accountsone for retirement, one for sickness, one for unemployment, one for the kids, and so on, each connected to our employment, so that we understand that everything good in life depends upon our boss (and not the government)and every day wed check in to see how theyre doing, what needs attending to, what can be better invested elsewhere. Its as if, in the neoliberal dream, were all retirees in Boca, with nothing better to do than to check in with our broker, except of course that were not.
If ObamaCare is permitted to entrench itself, the next step will be to have a Retirement Marketplace, with Social Security as the public option, so that the rentiers can run the 401(k) scam a second time for more fees, because shopping.*** Does anybody really believe that wont happen?
In real (or at least our preferred) life, we do have other, better things to do. We have books to read, children to raise, friends to meet, loved ones to care for, amusements to enjoy, drinks to drink, walks to take, webs to surf, couches to lie on, games to play, movies to see, protests to make, movements to build, marches to march, and more. Most days, we dont have time to do any of that. Were working way too many hours for too little pay, and in the remaining few hours (minutes) we have, after the kids are asleep, the dishes are washed, and the laundry is done, we have to haggle with insurance companies about doctors bills, deal with school officials needing forms signed, and more.
Thats not a bug. Its a feature.
Whats so astounding about Romneys proposal (which became Obama's)and the neoliberal worldview more generallyis that it would just add to this immense, and incredibly shitty, hassle of everyday life. One more account to keep track of, one more bell to answer. Why would anyone want to live like that? I sure as hell dont know, but I think thats the goal of the neoliberals: not just so that were more responsible with our money, but also so that were more consumed by it: so that we dont have time for anything else. Especially anything, like politics, that would upset the social order as it is.
Indeed. A social order where the rich have staff to do their shopping for them, Presidents slide out from under the mandate to shop that they impose on others, and the rest of us Well, heres what were expected to do:
The key point to remember in all discussions of ObamaCare is that neither it, nor indeed the entire private health insurance industry, should exist. They are rent-seeking parasites, economic tapeworms. One does not improve a tapeworm; one removes it.
Were mandated to keep that tapeworm fat, happy, and well-fed. By shopping for a defective product with time we have to steal from what wed really rather be doing than shopping for insurance, and that means almost anything. The Canadians dont have to crap around with any of this. Why should we? Bush famously said I encourage you all to go shopping more. Leave it to Obama, not to encourage, but force us to shop!
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTE * If I elected, my family and I will purchase health insurance on the exchanges together would be a great campaign promise for a populist campaign, especially when followed by until such time as we pass Medicare for All, which I expect to do in my first term. Bernie? Brian? No, not you, Elizabeth.
NOTE ** Theres also the argument that Obama would have had difficulty signing up because of Experians identity validation software might not have been able to handle his special case. Really? So have Obama get on the phone with support, like the rest of us. Symbolism, ya know. Symbolism. And dont tell me he doesnt have time; hes on his way to a vacation in Hawaii!
NOTE *** We might consider making the experiment of mentally replacing because free markets or because liberty, when encountered, with because shopping. Could be interesting!
NOTE The Republican reaction is priceless:
Im glad he did it, Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) said in an interview Monday. Im not going to take a cheap shot at him for signing up. . [It's a tough job, but somebody has to do it!] Chaffetz added: Hes the president of the United States. His health care is a little different than the rest of us.
Not in Canada!
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
68 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Retired cops, activist pensioners, and the economic blowback over Snowden By David Sirota
Demeter
Dec 2013
#4
America’s Shopper-in-Chief Has His Staff Sign Him Up for ObamaCare (But Not His Family)
Demeter
Dec 2013
#14
Market Participation, aka Shopping, as a Toll of Neoliberalism: Obamacare as Case Study
Demeter
Dec 2013
#26
Sen. Elizabeth Warren Introduces Bill To Stop Credit Reports For Job Applications
Demeter
Dec 2013
#9
Susan Rice: NSA Officials Didn’t Lie, They ‘Inadvertently Made False Representations’ 60 MIN
Demeter
Dec 2013
#13
American Express to pay $75 million in deceptive practices case FINALLY! By Stuart Pfeifer
Demeter
Dec 2013
#15
The Government Is Quietly Giving Way More Housing Aid To Rich People Than Poor People
Demeter
Dec 2013
#25
US Government Pays Contractors Twice as Much as Civil Servants for the Same Work
Demeter
Dec 2013
#30
“Violent And Terrifying Criminal Stunt” At JP Morgan More Of A “Musical Presentation”
Demeter
Dec 2013
#40
The Church of "Stop Shopping": Meet the Man Leading An Uprising Against The World’s Biggest Banks
Demeter
Dec 2013
#45
The Real Reason Healthcare Insurance Companies Are Now Encouraging Obamacare Enrollment
Demeter
Dec 2013
#50
The 7 Most Important Things Congress Did in 2013 (and the Top 25 Things It Didn’t)
Demeter
Dec 2013
#51
A New Twist in International Relations: The Corporate Keep-My-Data-Out-of-the-U.S. Clause
Demeter
Dec 2013
#53
Jimmy Fallon And Cecily Strong's Adorable 'Baby It's Cold Outside' Parody Will Make You Smile
Demeter
Dec 2013
#58
Ghost Ship Sinking: US To Sink Abandoned Boat From Japan Tsunami With Explosives
Demeter
Dec 2013
#59