Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Economy
In reply to the discussion: STOCK MARKET WATCH -- Friday, 27 December 2013 [View all]Demeter
(85,373 posts)35. Millions of 'missing workers' continue to make the monthly jobs reports look better than they are
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/12/09/1261253/-Millions-of-missing-workers-continue-to-make-the-monthly-jobs-reports-look-better-than-they-are
?1386614810
The latest job growth reportreleased Friday by the Bureau of Labor Statisticswould in normal times be an unalloyed piece of good news. The official unemployment rate fell to 7 percent (a five-year low), 203,000 new jobs were created (putting the economy on track to show the best job growth since 2005), the labor-force expanded and the labor-force participation rate grew, wages edged up and the percentage of people forced to work part-time fell (only partly due to a return to work by employees furloughed by the government shutdown). Add November's results to the total, and 7.4 million new jobs have been created since February 2010, definitely nothing to sneeze at.
But those improvements conceal a continuing problem that keeps being ignored or explained away as just a matter of demographics: The missing workers. The folks at the Economic Policy Institute have done an excellent job of keeping track of "missing workers." They explain the category thusly:
That's not just a handful of missing workers, but, by EPI's calculations for October, 5.66 million of them. If those missing workers were looking for a job, the employment rate would be 10.3 percent instead of 7.0 percent. It is argued in some quarters that most of these missing workers aren't really missing. The numbers, it is said, are just a reflection of the growing cohort of retiring baby boomers and a long-term trend that started two decades ago of young adults not entering the work force in as great of percentages as used to be the case. Without doubt, both these factors play a part in the dwindling of the labor force. Nobody can dispute that there will be a tremendous long-term impact from retirements of baby boomersthe first wave of whom will turn 68 starting next month. But that assessment ignores one big painful reality: The majority of the "missing workers" aren't those aged 18 to 24 nor the superannuated. Most are, instead, people in what demographers call the "prime earning years"age 25 to 54. And a big chunk of them are over 55 but haven't reached 62 when they can first start collecting a Social Security check (though without full benefits). That is not an age group likely to quit working unless they have no choice.
If the economy were to really take off, something that has been predicted to be just around the corner since late 2009, many of those missing workers in what were supposed to be their prime earning years would presumably return to the labor force and start looking for work. But despite improvements, that growth is still tepid and millions have given up trying to find a job that experience has told them isn't there. Tie these missing and officially uncounted Americans in with the 4.1 million who make up the long-term unemployed who have been out of work for 27 weeks or longer and the more complete story of the job recovery is clearly not a happy one. Add in income and wealth inequality, wage stagnation that now puts the inflation-adjusted median full-time wage of those who do have work at $1,000 less than it was in 2007, scandalous poverty and child-poverty rates and the continuing outflow of jobs due to unfettered globalization and it's easy to see why the monthly jobs reportthrough no fault of the Bureau of Labor Statisticsdistorts our actual circumstances.
http://www.epi.org/?p=55968&utm_source=epi_press&utm_medium=chart_embed&utm_campaign=charts_v1&view=embed&embed_template=charts_v2013_08_21" frameborder="0"></iframe>
MORE CHARTS AT http://www.epi.org/publication/missing-workers/
?1386614810
The latest job growth reportreleased Friday by the Bureau of Labor Statisticswould in normal times be an unalloyed piece of good news. The official unemployment rate fell to 7 percent (a five-year low), 203,000 new jobs were created (putting the economy on track to show the best job growth since 2005), the labor-force expanded and the labor-force participation rate grew, wages edged up and the percentage of people forced to work part-time fell (only partly due to a return to work by employees furloughed by the government shutdown). Add November's results to the total, and 7.4 million new jobs have been created since February 2010, definitely nothing to sneeze at.
But those improvements conceal a continuing problem that keeps being ignored or explained away as just a matter of demographics: The missing workers. The folks at the Economic Policy Institute have done an excellent job of keeping track of "missing workers." They explain the category thusly:
In todays labor market, the unemployment rate drastically understates the weakness of job opportunities. This is due to the existence of a large pool of missing workerspotential workers who, because of weak job opportunities, are neither employed nor actively seeking a job. In other words, these are people who would be either working or looking for work if job opportunities were significantly stronger. Because jobless workers are only counted as unemployed if they are actively seeking work, these missing workers are not reflected in the unemployment rate.
That's not just a handful of missing workers, but, by EPI's calculations for October, 5.66 million of them. If those missing workers were looking for a job, the employment rate would be 10.3 percent instead of 7.0 percent. It is argued in some quarters that most of these missing workers aren't really missing. The numbers, it is said, are just a reflection of the growing cohort of retiring baby boomers and a long-term trend that started two decades ago of young adults not entering the work force in as great of percentages as used to be the case. Without doubt, both these factors play a part in the dwindling of the labor force. Nobody can dispute that there will be a tremendous long-term impact from retirements of baby boomersthe first wave of whom will turn 68 starting next month. But that assessment ignores one big painful reality: The majority of the "missing workers" aren't those aged 18 to 24 nor the superannuated. Most are, instead, people in what demographers call the "prime earning years"age 25 to 54. And a big chunk of them are over 55 but haven't reached 62 when they can first start collecting a Social Security check (though without full benefits). That is not an age group likely to quit working unless they have no choice.
If the economy were to really take off, something that has been predicted to be just around the corner since late 2009, many of those missing workers in what were supposed to be their prime earning years would presumably return to the labor force and start looking for work. But despite improvements, that growth is still tepid and millions have given up trying to find a job that experience has told them isn't there. Tie these missing and officially uncounted Americans in with the 4.1 million who make up the long-term unemployed who have been out of work for 27 weeks or longer and the more complete story of the job recovery is clearly not a happy one. Add in income and wealth inequality, wage stagnation that now puts the inflation-adjusted median full-time wage of those who do have work at $1,000 less than it was in 2007, scandalous poverty and child-poverty rates and the continuing outflow of jobs due to unfettered globalization and it's easy to see why the monthly jobs reportthrough no fault of the Bureau of Labor Statisticsdistorts our actual circumstances.
http://www.epi.org/?p=55968&utm_source=epi_press&utm_medium=chart_embed&utm_campaign=charts_v1&view=embed&embed_template=charts_v2013_08_21" frameborder="0"></iframe>
MORE CHARTS AT http://www.epi.org/publication/missing-workers/
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
50 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The Entire Fiat Money System is Bankrupt: Demise of the Global US Fiat Dollar Reserve Currency
Demeter
Dec 2013
#3
Wall Street Is My Landlord; Blackstone's Home Rental Bonds Yet Another Sign of Renewed Credit Bubble
Demeter
Dec 2013
#6
Despite Two Industry Bans, Billionaire Phil Falcone Is Eligible For $20 Million Payday
xchrom
Dec 2013
#23
Millions of 'missing workers' continue to make the monthly jobs reports look better than they are
Demeter
Dec 2013
#35
50 Is the New 65: Older Americans Are Getting Booted from Their Jobs -- and Denied New Opportunities
Demeter
Dec 2013
#39
Markets a bit flat but euro currency flying. 10yr yields over 3% now. Oil over $100/bbl
Roland99
Dec 2013
#40