Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Economy
In reply to the discussion: STOCK MARKET WATCH -- Monday, 30 January 2012 [View all]Demeter
(85,373 posts)6. Made in the World By THOMAS L. FRIEDMAN HE'S BEING AN IDIOT, AS USUAL
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/29/opinion/sunday/friedman-made-in-the-world.html
...There is today an enormous gap between the way many C.E.O.s in America not Wall Street-types, but the people who lead premier companies that make things and create real jobs look at the world and how the average congressmen, senator or president looks at the world. They are literally looking at two different worlds and this applies to both parties. Consider the meeting that this paper reported on from last February between President Obama and the Apple co-founder Steve Jobs, who died in October. The president, understandably, asked Jobs why almost all of the 70 million iPhones, 30 million iPads and 59 million other products Apple sold last year were made overseas. Obama inquired, couldnt that work come back home? Those jobs arent coming back, Jobs replied. Politicians see the world as blocs of voters living in specific geographies and they see their job as maximizing the economic benefits for the voters in their geography. Many C.E.O.s, though, increasingly see the world as a place where their products can be made anywhere through global supply chains (often assembled with nonunion-protected labor) and sold everywhere.
These C.E.O.s rarely talk about outsourcing these days. Their world is now so integrated that there is no out and no in anymore. In their businesses, every product and many services now are imagined, designed, marketed and built through global supply chains that seek to access the best quality talent at the lowest cost, wherever it exists. They see more and more of their products today as Made in the World not Made in America. Therein lies the tension. So many of our companies actually see themselves now as citizens of the world. But Obama is president of the United States. Victor Fung, the chairman of Li & Fung, one of Hong Kongs oldest textile manufacturers, remarked to me last year that for many years his company operated on the rule: You sourced in Asia, and you sold in America and Europe. Now, said Fung, the rule is: Source everywhere, manufacture everywhere, sell everywhere. The whole notion of an export is really disappearing. Mike Splinter, the C.E.O. of Applied Materials, has put it to me this way: Outsourcing was 10 years ago, where youd say, Lets send some software generation overseas. This is not the outsourcing were doing today. This is just where I am going to get something done. Now you say, Hey, half my Ph.D.s in my R-and-D department would rather live in Singapore, Taiwan or China because their hometown is there and they can go there and still work for my company. This is the next evolution. He has many more choices. Added Michael Dell, founder of Dell Inc.: I always remind people that 96 percent of our potential new customers today live outside of America. Thats the rest of the world. And if companies like Dell want to sell to them, he added, it needs to design and manufacture some parts of its products in their countries.
This is the world we are living in. It is not going away. But America can thrive in this world, explained Yossi Sheffi, the M.I.T. logistics expert, if it empowers as many of our workers as possible to participate in different links of these global supply chains either imagining products, designing products, marketing products, orchestrating the supply chain for products, manufacturing high-end products and retailing products. If we get our share, well do fine.
And heres the good news: We have a huge natural advantage to compete in this kind of world, if we just get our act together. In a world where the biggest returns go to those who imagine and design a product, there is no higher imagination-enabling society than America. In a world where talent is the most important competitive advantage, there is no country that historically welcomed talented immigrants more than America. In a world in which protection for intellectual property and secure capital markets is highly prized by innovators and investors alike, there is no country safer than America. In a world in which the returns on innovation are staggering, our government funding of bioscience, new technology and clean energy is a great advantage. In a world where logistics will be the source of a huge number of middle-class jobs, we have FedEx and U.P.S. If only if only we could come together on a national strategy to enhance and expand all of our natural advantages: more immigration, most post-secondary education, better infrastructure, more government research, smart incentives for spurring millions of start-ups and a long-term plan to really fix our long-term debt problems nobody could touch us. Were that close.
THIS "OPINION" IS SO ELITIST, SO SELECTIVE TO FAVOR THE 1%, AND SO FULL OF HOLES, IT RESEMBLES SWISS CHEESE, THE OLD-FASHIONED KIND.
1) STEVE JOBS DOESN'T MAKE THE RULES. AND HE'S DEAD, ANYWAY.
2) CHINA SACRIFICED ITS PEOPLE TO GET THOSE JOBS--AS IN DID THEM SERIOUS INJURY AND EVEN DEATH.
3) NATIONS ARE NOT GOING AWAY, GLOBALISM IS. IT'S UNSUSTAINABLE AND IMMORAL IN ITS PRESENT FORM.
4) WE NEED A PRESIDENT WHO ISN'T SUCH A PUSHOVER. WE HAVE BORDERS FOR A REASON. IT'S TIME TO FIND SOMEONE WHO RESPECTS OUR BORDERS AND THE BORDERS OF OTHER NATIONS, AND HAVE HIM/HER LEAD THE POLICY OF THIS NATION.
...There is today an enormous gap between the way many C.E.O.s in America not Wall Street-types, but the people who lead premier companies that make things and create real jobs look at the world and how the average congressmen, senator or president looks at the world. They are literally looking at two different worlds and this applies to both parties. Consider the meeting that this paper reported on from last February between President Obama and the Apple co-founder Steve Jobs, who died in October. The president, understandably, asked Jobs why almost all of the 70 million iPhones, 30 million iPads and 59 million other products Apple sold last year were made overseas. Obama inquired, couldnt that work come back home? Those jobs arent coming back, Jobs replied. Politicians see the world as blocs of voters living in specific geographies and they see their job as maximizing the economic benefits for the voters in their geography. Many C.E.O.s, though, increasingly see the world as a place where their products can be made anywhere through global supply chains (often assembled with nonunion-protected labor) and sold everywhere.
These C.E.O.s rarely talk about outsourcing these days. Their world is now so integrated that there is no out and no in anymore. In their businesses, every product and many services now are imagined, designed, marketed and built through global supply chains that seek to access the best quality talent at the lowest cost, wherever it exists. They see more and more of their products today as Made in the World not Made in America. Therein lies the tension. So many of our companies actually see themselves now as citizens of the world. But Obama is president of the United States. Victor Fung, the chairman of Li & Fung, one of Hong Kongs oldest textile manufacturers, remarked to me last year that for many years his company operated on the rule: You sourced in Asia, and you sold in America and Europe. Now, said Fung, the rule is: Source everywhere, manufacture everywhere, sell everywhere. The whole notion of an export is really disappearing. Mike Splinter, the C.E.O. of Applied Materials, has put it to me this way: Outsourcing was 10 years ago, where youd say, Lets send some software generation overseas. This is not the outsourcing were doing today. This is just where I am going to get something done. Now you say, Hey, half my Ph.D.s in my R-and-D department would rather live in Singapore, Taiwan or China because their hometown is there and they can go there and still work for my company. This is the next evolution. He has many more choices. Added Michael Dell, founder of Dell Inc.: I always remind people that 96 percent of our potential new customers today live outside of America. Thats the rest of the world. And if companies like Dell want to sell to them, he added, it needs to design and manufacture some parts of its products in their countries.
This is the world we are living in. It is not going away. But America can thrive in this world, explained Yossi Sheffi, the M.I.T. logistics expert, if it empowers as many of our workers as possible to participate in different links of these global supply chains either imagining products, designing products, marketing products, orchestrating the supply chain for products, manufacturing high-end products and retailing products. If we get our share, well do fine.
And heres the good news: We have a huge natural advantage to compete in this kind of world, if we just get our act together. In a world where the biggest returns go to those who imagine and design a product, there is no higher imagination-enabling society than America. In a world where talent is the most important competitive advantage, there is no country that historically welcomed talented immigrants more than America. In a world in which protection for intellectual property and secure capital markets is highly prized by innovators and investors alike, there is no country safer than America. In a world in which the returns on innovation are staggering, our government funding of bioscience, new technology and clean energy is a great advantage. In a world where logistics will be the source of a huge number of middle-class jobs, we have FedEx and U.P.S. If only if only we could come together on a national strategy to enhance and expand all of our natural advantages: more immigration, most post-secondary education, better infrastructure, more government research, smart incentives for spurring millions of start-ups and a long-term plan to really fix our long-term debt problems nobody could touch us. Were that close.
THIS "OPINION" IS SO ELITIST, SO SELECTIVE TO FAVOR THE 1%, AND SO FULL OF HOLES, IT RESEMBLES SWISS CHEESE, THE OLD-FASHIONED KIND.
1) STEVE JOBS DOESN'T MAKE THE RULES. AND HE'S DEAD, ANYWAY.
2) CHINA SACRIFICED ITS PEOPLE TO GET THOSE JOBS--AS IN DID THEM SERIOUS INJURY AND EVEN DEATH.
3) NATIONS ARE NOT GOING AWAY, GLOBALISM IS. IT'S UNSUSTAINABLE AND IMMORAL IN ITS PRESENT FORM.
4) WE NEED A PRESIDENT WHO ISN'T SUCH A PUSHOVER. WE HAVE BORDERS FOR A REASON. IT'S TIME TO FIND SOMEONE WHO RESPECTS OUR BORDERS AND THE BORDERS OF OTHER NATIONS, AND HAVE HIM/HER LEAD THE POLICY OF THIS NATION.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
91 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Federal mortgage fraud task force subpoenas 11 banks SCHNEIDERMAN STARTS WITH BANG
Demeter
Jan 2012
#14
Economic collapse in the Western nations-On the Edge with Max Keiser-01-27-2012
Demeter
Jan 2012
#16
7 Signs the Corporatocracy is Losing its Legitimacy--and 7 Tools to Help Shut it Down
xchrom
Jan 2012
#36
We’ve Gone from a Nation of Laws to a Nation of Powerful Men Making Laws in Secret
Demeter
Jan 2012
#76