Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Economy
In reply to the discussion: STOCK MARKET WATCH -- Friday, 23 May 2014 [View all]Demeter
(85,373 posts)16. Has America’s Use of Finance as a Foreign Policy Tool Backfired?
http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2014/05/americas-use-finance-foreign-policy-tool-backfired.html
From the 1980s onward, one of the major aims of American foreign policy has been to make the world safer for US investment bankers. That might seem like an exaggeration until you look at the priorities of American economic policy as well as the actions of US-dominated international institutions like the World Bank and the IMF. The World Bank, though its International Finance Corporations, pushed emerging economies to set up capital markets. The posture was that more open markets were always better.
Now that weve had repeated tsunamis of hot money flows in and out of small economies wreak havoc with them, conventional wisdom among development economists is more along the lines of protectionism in emerging economies is desirable so they can develop companies and/or export sectors that are capable of competing internationally, and also serve domestic markets, so that the economy isnt too export dependent. Open capital markets produce too much volatility in interest and foreign exchange rates and thus undermine internal development.
DUH!
Similarly, the US has pressed advanced economies for more open financial markets. Americas insistence that Japan deregulate its banking system was a prime driver of its 1980s bubble (I had a birds eye view of how the Japanese banks went full bore into all sorts of products and markets they didnt understand and incurred huge losses as a result).
A cynic might point out that Japans speculative boom and bust put a decisive end to Japans status as serious challenger to American economic dominance. The Chinese, the poster children of successful development, have made a close study of the Japanese experience. Among other things, the Chinese decided to maintain tight control over the banking system and have restricted international capital flows. Note these curbs have become less effective over time, perhaps due to neglect. Regional governments have helped spawn a large shadow banking system and wealthy company owners have been able to evade capital controls through over-invoicing. Nevertheless, the Chinese financial system is a long way away from being deregulated. As a result, the consensus among Western securities analysts is that China will be able to engineer a soft landing despite the scary size of its credit bubble.
MUCH MORE
From the 1980s onward, one of the major aims of American foreign policy has been to make the world safer for US investment bankers. That might seem like an exaggeration until you look at the priorities of American economic policy as well as the actions of US-dominated international institutions like the World Bank and the IMF. The World Bank, though its International Finance Corporations, pushed emerging economies to set up capital markets. The posture was that more open markets were always better.
Now that weve had repeated tsunamis of hot money flows in and out of small economies wreak havoc with them, conventional wisdom among development economists is more along the lines of protectionism in emerging economies is desirable so they can develop companies and/or export sectors that are capable of competing internationally, and also serve domestic markets, so that the economy isnt too export dependent. Open capital markets produce too much volatility in interest and foreign exchange rates and thus undermine internal development.
DUH!
Similarly, the US has pressed advanced economies for more open financial markets. Americas insistence that Japan deregulate its banking system was a prime driver of its 1980s bubble (I had a birds eye view of how the Japanese banks went full bore into all sorts of products and markets they didnt understand and incurred huge losses as a result).
A cynic might point out that Japans speculative boom and bust put a decisive end to Japans status as serious challenger to American economic dominance. The Chinese, the poster children of successful development, have made a close study of the Japanese experience. Among other things, the Chinese decided to maintain tight control over the banking system and have restricted international capital flows. Note these curbs have become less effective over time, perhaps due to neglect. Regional governments have helped spawn a large shadow banking system and wealthy company owners have been able to evade capital controls through over-invoicing. Nevertheless, the Chinese financial system is a long way away from being deregulated. As a result, the consensus among Western securities analysts is that China will be able to engineer a soft landing despite the scary size of its credit bubble.
MUCH MORE
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
41 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Jamie Dimon’s sinister P.R. ploy: What’s really behind JPMorgan’s Detroit investment
Demeter
May 2014
#20
And the self-inflicted wounds are going to kill us long before they bother the rest of world
Demeter
May 2014
#41
You know, I wasn't paying particular attention and another Weekend Snuck Up on Me!
Demeter
May 2014
#22
NYSE Margin Debt Declined Again in April; Leading Indicator for a Market Correction?
DemReadingDU
May 2014
#31