Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Weekend Economists Making Choices October 24-26, 2014 [View all]
How the Pill Overcame Impossible Odds And Found a Place in Millions of Women's Purses By Ann Friedman BOOK REVIEW
http://www.newrepublic.com/article/119569/birth-pill-jonathan-eig-reviewed-ann-friedman
Margaret Sanger promised it would be a miracle tablet. Hugh Hefner hailed it as a powerful weapon. A 30-year-old woman with six children called it my ray of hope. The pill is now so commonfour out of five sexually active women have used itthat its easy to forget that oral contraception was once the stuff of fantasy.
In The Birth of the Pill: How Four Crusaders Reinvented Sex and Launched a Revolution, Jonathan Eig chronicles the decades-long effort to make that fantasy a reality. In his telling, this transformation is thanks to a unique alliance between feminists and scientists: the spotlight-seeking activist Margaret Sanger, the rebel researcher Goody Pincus, the single-minded heiress Katherine McCormick, and the photogenic family doctor John Rock. These four people provide a formula for what it takes to create scientific breakthroughs that are ahead of their time politically: an incredible amount of drive and little concern for traditional values, a willingness to flout powerful institutions and their rewards, a tremendous amount of money, and, eventually, a way to appeal to the mainstream. Its no wonder that, despite lots of modern talk about disruption and innovation, truly world-changing breakthroughs are so rare.
America before the pill sounds like something out of Margaret Atwood. Contraception was illegal in most states from 1873 until after World War I, and not even recognized by the American Medical Association until 1937. Single women in 26 states were denied contraception until well into the 1960s. While some women were lucky enough to live in a state with more liberal birth-control laws or near a clinic that was willing to circumvent them, many were out of luck. Women used douches as a dangerous and ineffective morning-after contraceptive. Some tried the rhythm method, but even doctors knowledge of the reproductive system was still spotty, so that technique wasnt very effective. Condoms were available, but married couples were reluctant to use them. Some clinics offered diaphragms, which were often poorly fitted and difficult to obtain. And these methods were only available to women with male partners who were interested in preventing pregnancy. Many men were not.
As early as 1914, Margaret Sanger, then a womens health activist in New York, had a crazy idea: reliable birth controlideally in pill form so womens partners wouldnt even have to know they were taking it. It wouldnt just ensure that woman was not synonymous with mother, it would be the dawn of a new era of womens pleasure and self-realization: sex without fear of pregnancy. Sanger knew that as long as men had the final say in when and how women became mothers, they would have the final say about all aspects of womens lives.
This was a long-term goal, though. In the meantime, Sanger founded the Birth Control Federation, later called Planned Parenthood, to distribute condoms and diaphragms and lobby for the liberalization of contraception laws. She became a figurehead. She fretted that talking about family planning instead of birth control would dilute her movement, yet seemed to have few qualms about cozying up to racist, eugenicist population control advocates in the hopes of spreading the birth control message wider and farther. But in the post-war era, as contraception became more accepted but still remained politically taboo, Sanger grew sick of the incremental approach. She did not want to focus on improving the diaphragm. She did not want to distribute more condoms. She wanted a pill.
This was a tall order. The midcentury medical establishment was still figuring out how hormones workedan oral contraceptive was a pipe dream. And Sanger couldnt exactly roll up to a respected research institution and ask their most forward-thinking scientists to create one. Anti-contraception laws were still on the books in most states, and even though enforcement was lax, venerated institutions werent eager to push the bounds of legality. Sanger herself was a nationally known firebrandnot the type of person that tenured Ivy League medical researchers would have lunch with. Instead she sought out Pincus, a scientist with a genius IQ and a dubious reputation who had been fired from Harvard and recently established his own private research institution in Worcester, Massachusetts. Pincus was interested in science and action, not long-term budgets or endowments, Eig writes. He loved a challenge. And so when Sanger came to him in 1950 with her crazy idea for a pregnancy-preventing pill and asked if it was possible, he said he was willing to try.
Pincuss research was enabled by the largess of Katherine McCormick, who had earned a biology degree at MIT and later inherited a fortune when her schizophrenic husband died not long into their marriage. She, like Sanger, saw controlling fertility as essential to womens self-determination. In 1923, when contraception was still very much illegal in the United States, she smuggled diaphragms from Europe by buying them in bulk and having them sewn inside newly purchased clothing. When the paltry research budget Sanger was able to wrangle from Planned Parenthood proved insufficient, McCormick stepped in, funneling millions of dollars (in todays money) toward Pincuss research...
BUT IT WASN'T ALL RAINBOWS AND UNICORNS, NOR SMOOTH SAILING. IT WAS A HARROWING ADVENTURE! READ MORE OR LISTEN TO THE PODCAST BELOW:
http://www.npr.org/blogs/health/2014/10/07/354103536/the-great-bluff-that-lead-to-a-magical-pill-and-a-sexual-revolution
Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world; indeed, it's the only thing that ever has.---Margaret Mead
Margaret Sanger
Katharine McCormick, biologist & millionaire philanthropist; FOR A SHORT BIO:
http://www.amazingwomeninhistory.com/katharine-mccormick-birth-control-history/
AUTHOR JONATHAN EIG
http://www.trbimg.com/img-543fdc4b/turbine/ctfl-jonathan-eig-web-jpg-20141016/900/900x506
MANY OF MY GREAT AUNTS TOOK TO THE CHURCH, TO AVOID BEARING 17 CHILDREN, AS THEIR MOTHER DID....WE AREN'T THAT FAR FROM THAT TIME...ONLY 3 GENERATIONS OR SO!
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
68 replies, 17589 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (10)
ReplyReply to this post
68 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I guess an idea hits the mainstream when a country music ballad is written about it
Demeter
Oct 2014
#25
The Bidding For The 2022 Olympics Is A Disaster, And The $51-Billion Sochi Games Is Getting The Blam
xchrom
Oct 2014
#11
Paul Krugman, In 2 Minutes, Destroys The Argument That We Can't Pay Fast-Food Workers BETTER
Demeter
Oct 2014
#34
Why sending weapons to Ukraine would be a terrible idea for the US Michael Kofman
Demeter
Oct 2014
#63
Top Ebola Scientists: Ebola More Likely to Spread by Aerosol In Cold, Dry Conditions than Hot, Humid
Demeter
Oct 2014
#45
Jamie Dimon: U.S. Must Create a “Safe Harbor” Where JPM’s Corruption Is Not “Punished”
antigop
Oct 2014
#46
Canada, At War For 13 Years, Shocked That ‘A Terrorist’ Attacked Its Soldiers
bread_and_roses
Oct 2014
#52
Righteous Indignation (and Uncontrolled Panic) from the "Droning" Western World
Demeter
Oct 2014
#54
This parallels my musings .... and highlights why I thought this (different article) was so idiotic
bread_and_roses
Oct 2014
#61
I have reflected on this coming apocalypse from an engineering/education perspective
Demeter
Oct 2014
#62