Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

longship

(40,416 posts)
4. First, not talking about behind the meter.
Mon Jan 16, 2017, 10:29 PM
Jan 2017

Behind the meter is almost totally incapable of fulfilling clean energy needs on a large scale. We need the large energy companies to adopt clean energy, not just Joe Blow with his house roof solar panels or Hugo Bigfactory Company.

Last I heard, pumped hydro efficiency has approx 80% efficiency. Plus, it can be added onto existing infrastructure with existing technology which is a huge advantage. Storage batteries don't come even close to that efficiency and require rather new infrastructure and tech that has yet to be built into the grid.

Forget hydrogen. Generating it is a huge energy sink.

Just pump water uphill. Easy Peasey! 80% is pretty damned good. Plus, there are lots of places where much of the infrastructure is already in place.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Nothing can compete with ...»Reply #4