Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hunter

(40,931 posts)
3. We can't change physical reality.
Sun Jun 14, 2026, 11:24 AM
Sunday

𝑃=𝜌𝑄𝑔Δℎ

Power output (P) is proportional to the difference between the inlet elevation and the outlet elevation ( Δℎ )

The turbines at Hoover Dam are optimized for a certain Δℎ. Conceivably turbines could be installed or modified to operate at a lower elevation of water behind the dam but the amount of electricity produced would not offset the cost of this modification. It's much less trouble to build natural gas fueled power plants.

In any case, Hoover dam hasn't been a major source of power in recent years and the utilities have already accounted for this. For comparison, in recent times Hoover Dam's total electrical output is about one-tenth that of Arizona's Palo Verde nuclear power station.



Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Lake Mead Elevation Curre...»Reply #3