Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Environment & Energy
Showing Original Post only (View all)NOAA Confirms High Methane Leakage Rate Up To **9%** From Gas Fields [View all]
NOAA Confirms High Methane Leakage Rate Up To 9% From Gas Fields, Gutting Climate Benefit
Researchers with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) have reconfirmed earlier findings of high rates of methane leakage from natural gas fields. If these findings are replicated elsewhere, they would utterly vitiate the climate benefit of natural gas, even when used to switch off coal.
Leakage of 4%, let alone 9%, would call into question the value of unconventional gas as any sort of bridge fuel. Colm Sweeney, the head of the aircraft program at NOAAs Earth System Research Laboratory, who led the studys aerial component, told Nature:
Researchers with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) have reconfirmed earlier findings of high rates of methane leakage from natural gas fields. If these findings are replicated elsewhere, they would utterly vitiate the climate benefit of natural gas, even when used to switch off coal.
the research team reported new Colorado data that support the earlier work, as well as preliminary results from a field study in the Uinta Basin of Utah suggesting even higher rates of methane leakage an eye-popping 9% of the total production. That figure is nearly double the cumulative loss rates estimated from industry data which are already higher in Utah than in Colorado.
Leakage of 4%, let alone 9%, would call into question the value of unconventional gas as any sort of bridge fuel. Colm Sweeney, the head of the aircraft program at NOAAs Earth System Research Laboratory, who led the studys aerial component, told Nature:
We were expecting to see high methane levels, but I dont think anybody really comprehended the true magnitude of what we would see.
Humanity appears to have two choices. Stop using fossil fuels almost entirely, almost immediately, or face thousands of years of temperatures well above what civilization can tolerate. In other words: we either lose civilization by dropping fossil fuels, or we lose civilization through climate change. Thank God we still have a choice...
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My Stuff » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My Stuff » Bookmarks)
29 replies, 5702 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (21)
ReplyReply to this post
29 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

NOAA Confirms High Methane Leakage Rate Up To **9%** From Gas Fields [View all]
GliderGuider
Jan 2013
OP
Spot on - "a choiceless choice" due to the nature of our belief in exceptionalism
Nihil
Jan 2013
#23
In that case the denial was probably the indirect defence of the wind industry ...
Nihil
Jan 2013
#22
Oh, hey, the next line of defense will be that methane is a natural substance.
djean111
Jan 2013
#26