HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Topics » Environment & Energy » Environment & Energy (Group) » NOAA Confirms High Methan... » Reply #19

Response to GliderGuider (Reply #6)

Thu Jan 3, 2013, 08:10 PM

19. Even as inhospitable as the results from IPCC RCP8.5 and the A1FI scenarios,

those models are still employing data dependent on lineal interpretation. I continue to have problems giving any weight to lineal models representing a dynamic exponential heating system.

Within this last year I have come to believe the IPCC and most of what it synthesizes into consensus reports that will survive the government minders, is near worthless in comparison to the data and theory offered by David Wasdell and presented between 2005-2009 in his many lectures and website postings, at Apollo-Gaia, Meridian, etc.

If one looks into the natural world at cause and effect relationships, how many complex systems can really be quantified by lineal interpretation. The very fact the parts of complex systems are interactive and interdependent and often inter reactive, the possible permutations of effect soon become exponential. It is the nature of the beast. Now we are being told by government science minders, lineal models and resulting conclusions capture an accurate representation of a complex heat system governing the climate of our planet. That global heating is equal to global warming, when the latter is just an effect of the former. That somehow we can have lineal temperature determination, with a exponential multidimensional feedback, cause.

It is this lack of confidence in the official models and data, that leaves me certain anything we do, will be ineffective in addressing physical solutions. Our present science theory is incomplete and incompatible to finding a solution.

So what do we do? Flow into the chasm with non attachment. At this point we are but spectators not deciders, of our destiny. Our actions can only realistically affect, our consciousness, and the manner we accept our anthropogenic dilemma.

On edit: corrected the use of the word 'affect/effect'.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 29 replies Author Time Post
GliderGuider Jan 2013 OP
OKIsItJustMe Jan 2013 #1
GliderGuider Jan 2013 #2
OKIsItJustMe Jan 2013 #5
GliderGuider Jan 2013 #8
Vox Moi Jan 2013 #3
NickB79 Jan 2013 #4
OKIsItJustMe Jan 2013 #7
joshcryer Jan 2013 #18
GliderGuider Jan 2013 #6
OKIsItJustMe Jan 2013 #9
GliderGuider Jan 2013 #10
OKIsItJustMe Jan 2013 #15
GliderGuider Jan 2013 #16
joshcryer Jan 2013 #25
NoOneMan Jan 2013 #11
GliderGuider Jan 2013 #12
OKIsItJustMe Jan 2013 #13
NoOneMan Jan 2013 #14
LineLineReply Even as inhospitable as the results from IPCC RCP8.5 and the A1FI scenarios,
CRH Jan 2013 #19
GliderGuider Jan 2013 #20
CRH Jan 2013 #21
CRH Jan 2013 #28
Nihil Jan 2013 #23
joshcryer Jan 2013 #17
Nihil Jan 2013 #22
joshcryer Jan 2013 #24
djean111 Jan 2013 #26
joshcryer Jan 2013 #27
CRH Jan 2013 #29
Please login to view edit histories.