Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

OKIsItJustMe

(21,875 posts)
8. Or, quite simply, we get off of our butts and do something about it
Thu Jan 24, 2013, 06:28 PM
Jan 2013
http://edgar.jrc.ec.europa.eu/CO2REPORT2012.pdf
[font face=Serif][font size=5]TRENDS IN GLOBAL CO2 EMISSIONS[/font]



[font size=4]Summary[/font]



[font size=3]Global emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) – the main cause of global warming – increased by 3% in 2011, reaching an all-time high of 34 billion tonnes in 2011. In 2011, China’s average per capita carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions increased by 9% to 7.2 tonnes CO2. Taking into account an uncertainty margin of 10%, this is similar to the per capita emissions in the European Union of 7.5 tonnes in 2011, the year in which the European Union saw a decrease in emissions of 3%. China, the world’s most populous country, is now well within the 6 to 19 tonnes/person range spanned by the major industrialised countries. In comparison, in 2011, the United States was still one of the largest emitters of CO2, with 17.3 tonnes in per capita emissions, after a steep decline mainly caused by the recession in 2008–2009, high oil prices compared to low fuel taxes and an increased share of natural gas.

With a decrease in 2008 and a 5% surge in 2010, the past decade saw an average annual increase of 2.7%. The top 5 emitters are China (share 29%), the United States (16%), the European Union (EU27) (11%), India (6%) and the Russian Federation (5%), followed by Japan (4%). The fact that global emissions continued this historical growth trend in 2011 seems remarkable at first sight, considering that in many OECD countries CO2 emissions in fact decreased – in the European Union by 3%, in the United States by 2% and in Japan by 2% – mainly due to weak economic conditions in many countries, mild winter weather in several countries and high oil prices. More important, however, is that CO2 emissions from OECD countries now account for only one third of global emissions – the same share as that of China and India, where emissions increased by 9% and 6%, respectively, in 2011. The increase in China’s CO2 emissions was mainly due to a continued high economic growth rate, with related increases in fossil fuel consumption. This increase in fuel consumption in 2011 was mainly driven by the increase in building construction and expansion of infrastructure, as indicated by the growth in cement and steel production. Domestic coal consumption grew by 9.7% and coal import increased by 10%, making China the world’s largest coal importer, overtaking Japan.

Levels of global CO2 emissions from flaring of unused gas during oil production, which have decreased by about 25% since 2003, did not significantly change in 2011. They roughly amount to the total of CO2 emissions in Spain. However, according to satellite observations, flaring emissions in the United States are on the rise, with a steep 50% increase in 2011. The main cause is the recent sharp increase in the country’s use of hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, for shale oil production and its ensuing flaring of co-produced gas. Recently, the United States also expanded shale gas fracking and has now become the largest natural gas producer in the world.

Since 2000, an estimated total of 420 billion tonnes CO2 was cumulatively emitted due to human activities (including deforestation). Scientific literature suggests that limiting average global temperature rise to 2 °C above pre-industrial levels – the target internationally adopted in UN climate negotiations – is possible if cumulative emissions in the 2000–2050 period do not exceed 1,000 to 1,500 billion tonnes CO2. If the current global increase in CO2 emissions continues, cumulative emissions will surpass this total within the next two decades.

…[/font][/font]


We can decrease carbon emissions. Of course, we need to go negative in relatively short order.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

K&R jpak Jan 2013 #1
K&R daleanime Jan 2013 #2
“Renewable power generation now accounts for around 50% of all new power generation capacity…” OKIsItJustMe Jan 2013 #3
Does it? NoOneMan Jan 2013 #4
Even if we manage to reduce the carbon intensity of our energy supply GliderGuider Jan 2013 #5
Or, quite simply, we get off of our butts and do something about it OKIsItJustMe Jan 2013 #8
Do your best! GliderGuider Jan 2013 #17
EROEI below 5:1 Terry in Austin Jan 2013 #25
Try this: GliderGuider Jan 2013 #27
Yes, it does say something… OKIsItJustMe Jan 2013 #7
I don't care. Its irrelevant NoOneMan Jan 2013 #9
No, you choose to claim it is irrelevant OKIsItJustMe Jan 2013 #10
This message was self-deleted by its author NoOneMan Jan 2013 #11
If aggregate emissions continue to increase, nothing else matters. Nothing. Nada. Zilch NoOneMan Jan 2013 #12
“We start when aggregate emissions begin to drop.” OKIsItJustMe Jan 2013 #13
No, we are kicking the can down the road and further screwing our situation NoOneMan Jan 2013 #14
I agree, we delayed acting for too long OKIsItJustMe Jan 2013 #15
Actually 0% *could* work. You are looking at this incorrectly NoOneMan Jan 2013 #16
That may be the wrong question. GliderGuider Jan 2013 #18
Its a rhetorical question NoOneMan Jan 2013 #23
It's the only sensible conclusion one could come to. GliderGuider Jan 2013 #24
In truth, a 0 carbon emissions level is not enough OKIsItJustMe Jan 2013 #19
"We both know that is not going to happen" NoOneMan Jan 2013 #22
What's the assumed capacity factor? GliderGuider Jan 2013 #6
There has to be an energy-efficiency factor too. Ghost Dog Jan 2013 #20
Oh, it's all good GliderGuider Jan 2013 #21
This message was deleted by the cat on the keyboard. n/t 2on2u Jan 2013 #26
Keyboard Cats, huh? Ghost Dog Jan 2013 #28
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Renewable Energy Revoluti...»Reply #8