Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

FBaggins

(28,631 posts)
6. There's a more relevant calculation in this case.
Tue Sep 17, 2013, 09:53 AM
Sep 2013

The amount of water isn't particularly relevant. Plenty of gullible/ignorant people see 300 tons of contaminated water as a bigger deal than one liter of water containing the same amount of activity.

The water that was released was measured at 24 Bq/L (below even drinking water standards). So if 1,000 tons were "dumped" (really just rainwater released exactly as the system was designed to do)... then that's one million liters... or 24 million Bq.

By comparison, a single self-illuminated exit sign contains 1-2 Trillion Bq of tritium. Tens of thousands of times as much activity. Heck... few people wear wrist watches these days, but the limit for those glowing watch faces was almost a million Bq. Would "dumping" a couple dozen wristwatches into the sea really warrant international news attention?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Did you know that you get as much background radiation chervilant Sep 2013 #1
Quite a bit more in fact. FBaggins Sep 2013 #3
O, it's you, again... chervilant Sep 2013 #19
Breaking this down... caraher Sep 2013 #20
Well, "alls I know" is: chervilant Sep 2013 #21
Just trying to help out FBaggins Sep 2013 #29
Applause! I concur! PamW Sep 2013 #30
Thank you PamW ..... oldhippie Sep 2013 #32
No, chervilant Sep 2013 #31
Minimizing?? Denying???? PamW Sep 2013 #33
If its ever been shown that nuclear energy is not a sane way to make our electricity madokie Sep 2013 #2
Why not do the calculation for yourself? PamW Sep 2013 #4
I'm pretty sure that nothing in nature is even close to what man has made madokie Sep 2013 #5
Why don't you LEARN instead of guessing WRONG!! PamW Sep 2013 #7
I didn't say it was the only thing madokie Sep 2013 #9
Why??? PamW Sep 2013 #12
PamW madokie Sep 2013 #13
I see... PamW Sep 2013 #14
You can go straight to madokie Sep 2013 #15
So "I'm done with you" really translates to... FBaggins Sep 2013 #16
Another "my mind ( sic ) is made up; don't confuse me with the facts... PamW Sep 2013 #17
There's a more relevant calculation in this case. FBaggins Sep 2013 #6
IQ Test PamW Sep 2013 #8
Pretty much everybody has the horsepower. It's just multiplication. phantom power Sep 2013 #10
It's the "word problem" aspect that gets 'em FBaggins Sep 2013 #11
I agree, but... caraher Sep 2013 #18
When I see posts like yours: chervilant Sep 2013 #22
But she's right ..... oldhippie Sep 2013 #24
Really? chervilant Sep 2013 #25
Yes, Really. oldhippie Sep 2013 #26
And, I from yours. n/t chervilant Sep 2013 #28
I see it more as a challenge.. PamW Sep 2013 #27
And the danger from doing that is ... Nihil Sep 2013 #23
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»1,000 Tons Of Polluted Fu...»Reply #6