Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
In reply to the discussion: Catastrophic Sea Level Rise within Three Generations [View all]xrm67
(21 posts)2. ...for each meter of sea level rise, the coastline is eroded, over time, by 100 meters.
Bruuns Rule states that on average each 1cm of sea level rise results in about 1m of coastal recession. In other words, for each meter of sea level rise, the coastline is eroded, over time, by 100 meters. While this Rule has global application, coastal erosion in the Arctic is occurring at a much faster rate than predicted because of permafrost thawing and exposure of shorelines to wave action.
http://www.skepticalscience.com/print.php?n=1051
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
53 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
...for each meter of sea level rise, the coastline is eroded, over time, by 100 meters.
xrm67
Apr 2015
#2
“The greatest shortcoming of the human race is our inability to understand the exponential function.
dixiegrrrrl
Apr 2015
#4
That's the first time you've mentioned freshwater, or inland glaciers
muriel_volestrangler
Apr 2015
#13
Freshwater pulses slowing down ocean currents has nothing to do with sea level or ice area
muriel_volestrangler
Apr 2015
#15
I will write a blog post about this and hopefully answer your questions once and for all.
xrm67
Apr 2015
#19
Again, no doubling period has been 'established' for sea level rise
muriel_volestrangler
Apr 2015
#22
2 data points for ice loss does not mean 'exponential sea level rise'
muriel_volestrangler
Apr 2015
#27
Any rational person can now see than an exponential doubling period has been established
xrm67
Apr 2015
#28
If you watch the video of Box I linked to in #22, you see he got the 69 feet from Alley
muriel_volestrangler
Apr 2015
#30
If it's in fits and starts, it's not exponential, by definition (nt)
muriel_volestrangler
Apr 2015
#45
Any process for something to be exponential while having gaps when nothing happens
muriel_volestrangler
Apr 2015
#52
Limits to Growth projections were correct... We're on track for collapse of industrial civilization
xrm67
Apr 2015
#12
Yes, I'm sure they're all wrong. Where's my TV remote? Pass me the buttered popcorn.
xrm67
Apr 2015
#23
What's your opinion of the Earth System sensitivity estimate by Wasdell et al
GliderGuider
Apr 2015
#29