Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

xrm67

(21 posts)
9. Exponential, exponential, exponential...
Thu Apr 9, 2015, 10:09 AM
Apr 2015

Last edited Thu Apr 9, 2015, 11:17 AM - Edit history (1)

No, Arctic sea ice decline has been exponential. In addition, old ice has been replaced by much newer, thinner ice to the point that algae is now growing underneath the surface of the ice. Just this winter, a new record low was recorded.

Arctic temperature amplification from exponentially declining sea ice and spring snow cover are the strongest feedbacks in our climate system today. The average albedo (reflectivity) of the Arctic region has decreased from 52% to a present day value of 48% over 3 or 4 decades. The increased absorption of energy in the Arctic has increased the temperature at high latitudes at rates up to 6 to 8x the global average temperature change. The reduced temperature difference between the Arctic and equator has reduced the west to east speed of the jet streams causing them to slow and become wavier and more fractured, and directly causing a large change in the statistics of our global weather. - Link


More recently:

The Arctic sea ice is thinning at a steadier and faster rate than researchers previously thought, a new study based on combined observations finds...

...Critics have said that previous calculations of ice loss seemed too rapid, and questioned their value, the researchers said. But the new study shows the ice may be thinning at an even faster rate than the calculations showed, the researchers said.

“At least for the central Arctic basin, even our most drastic thinning estimate was slower than measured by these observations,” co-researcher Axel Schweiger, a polar scientist at the University of Washington Applied Physics Laboratory, said to to LiveScience. - Link


IPCC linear modeling had Arctic sea ice disappearing by the end of this century, but it's happening this decade. The IPCC is corrupted by corporate interests...

...An 'exponential decline' in sea ice - covered up by the IPCC

According to the WMO, Arctic sea-ice extent reached its annual minimum extent on 17 September 2014, at just a patch above 5 million sq.km - the sixth lowest on record, according to the National Snow and Ice Data Center.

"There is quite a lot of natural variation from year to year", he says. "But the downward trend is clear - an exponential decline. It is what you expect from positive feedback, and exponential decline is a better fit to the data than a linear decline."

And he insists that his conclusions are firmly founded on peer-reviewed science, specifically observations of sea ice thickness confirmed by Cryosat-2, together with satellite imagery. Worse, he alleges, the IPCC has tampered with the raw data in order to downplay the dangers the world faces... - Link


An exponential trend was confirmed a couple years ago...

PIOMAS data confirm exponential trend
Just One meter would be an economic catastrophe mackdaddy Apr 2015 #1
...for each meter of sea level rise, the coastline is eroded, over time, by 100 meters. xrm67 Apr 2015 #2
Good links , Thanks mackdaddy Apr 2015 #3
I wish they wouldn't say generations and use years yeoman6987 Apr 2015 #26
“The greatest shortcoming of the human race is our inability to understand the exponential function. dixiegrrrrl Apr 2015 #4
But what says sea level rise is exponential? muriel_volestrangler Apr 2015 #5
Death by fire and flood xrm67 Apr 2015 #6
The PIOMAS model is a linear trend of -3000 km3/decade muriel_volestrangler Apr 2015 #8
Exponential, exponential, exponential... xrm67 Apr 2015 #9
And those uses of 'exponential' are incorrect muriel_volestrangler Apr 2015 #10
Freshwater ice melt from inland glaciers is not the same as old sea ice xrm67 Apr 2015 #11
That's the first time you've mentioned freshwater, or inland glaciers muriel_volestrangler Apr 2015 #13
If you actually read the article and know a little science, it would help xrm67 Apr 2015 #14
Freshwater pulses slowing down ocean currents has nothing to do with sea level or ice area muriel_volestrangler Apr 2015 #15
How else can I explain this to you before it sinks in? xrm67 Apr 2015 #16
Well done. GliderGuider Apr 2015 #17
No, no link about a meltwater pulse in your blog post muriel_volestrangler Apr 2015 #18
I will write a blog post about this and hopefully answer your questions once and for all. xrm67 Apr 2015 #19
Again, no doubling period has been 'established' for sea level rise muriel_volestrangler Apr 2015 #22
Doubling time of less than 5 years has been established. xrm67 Apr 2015 #24
2 data points for ice loss does not mean 'exponential sea level rise' muriel_volestrangler Apr 2015 #27
Any rational person can now see than an exponential doubling period has been established xrm67 Apr 2015 #28
If you watch the video of Box I linked to in #22, you see he got the 69 feet from Alley muriel_volestrangler Apr 2015 #30
We already have several data points showing exponential growth xrm67 Apr 2015 #31
Dear Baby Jebus, where do you get the patience? Systematic Chaos Apr 2015 #44
If it's in fits and starts, it's not exponential, by definition (nt) muriel_volestrangler Apr 2015 #45
That depends on the time frame, nicht war? GliderGuider Apr 2015 #48
Any process for something to be exponential while having gaps when nothing happens muriel_volestrangler Apr 2015 #52
Here is the real condition of Arctic sea ice and it's not good xrm67 Apr 2015 #33
Limits to Growth projections were correct... We're on track for collapse of industrial civilization xrm67 Apr 2015 #12
Limits to Growth projections were correct? LouisvilleDem Apr 2015 #21
Yes, I'm sure they're all wrong. Where's my TV remote? Pass me the buttered popcorn. xrm67 Apr 2015 #23
Nice try LouisvilleDem Apr 2015 #36
You really are Clueless xrm67 Apr 2015 #42
Where is your proof? LouisvilleDem Apr 2015 #53
How do you get exponentially declining sea ice... LouisvilleDem Apr 2015 #20
Earth Sensitivity to Human Forcings is what matters xrm67 Apr 2015 #25
What's your opinion of the Earth System sensitivity estimate by Wasdell et al GliderGuider Apr 2015 #29
I'd say it's not supported by the evidence LouisvilleDem Apr 2015 #34
LOL!!! One of the authors of that paper is a climate change denier xrm67 Apr 2015 #40
Judith Curry is not a denier LouisvilleDem Apr 2015 #51
And the other author has major credibility problems as well xrm67 Apr 2015 #41
You didn't answer my question LouisvilleDem Apr 2015 #35
ALL you have to do is look at the Keeling Curve xrm67 Apr 2015 #38
CO2 != Energy LouisvilleDem Apr 2015 #46
You can't possibly be this stupid. GliderGuider Apr 2015 #49
Please LouisvilleDem Apr 2015 #50
This definitely looks like exponential energy consumption xrm67 Apr 2015 #39
Question LouisvilleDem Apr 2015 #47
So this Climate Change Denier drive the bus of humanity off a cliff.... mackdaddy Apr 2015 #32
Predictions for the Future: A Grim Outlook xrm67 Apr 2015 #7
LOL LouisvilleDem Apr 2015 #37
Pointless comment xrm67 Apr 2015 #43
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Catastrophic Sea Level Ri...»Reply #9