Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

xrm67

(21 posts)
28. Any rational person can now see than an exponential doubling period has been established
Fri Apr 10, 2015, 09:53 AM
Apr 2015

Last edited Fri Apr 10, 2015, 10:58 AM - Edit history (1)

You are typical of a climate change denier who will completely sidestep evidence placed right in front of their face. I gave you the link to the 69 foot SLR already already locked in and you go and pick some other video from someone else. Here is the link describing why we are locked into nearly 70 feet of SLR, as argued by Jason Box:

http://www.motherjones.com/environment/2013/01/climate-desk-greenland-and-69-feet-sea-level-rise

Concerning the exponential growth in SLR that we may very well be in the beginning stages of:

The rate of change in SLR per year has been 1 to 1.4mm since 1900, but jumped to 3.2mm since 1990. That is a 100% to 200% increase for the last couple decades.

http://www.climatecentral.org/news/sea-level-rise-accelerating-18543

Now in the last five years, ice mass loss from the two largest ice sheets on the planet, Greenland ice sheet and West Antarctic Ice Sheet (WAIS), have more than doubled.

http://theenergycollective.com/josephromm/471941/greenland-and-west-antarctic-ice-sheet-loss-more-doubled-last-five-years

And the the stability of East Antarctica is being undermined in the same way:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/energy-environment/wp/2015/03/16/the-melting-of-antarctica-was-already-really-bad-it-just-got-worse/?postshare=8171426579871259

Summary:

SLR has increased by 100-200% in the last two decades compared to the rate of change from the beginning of the twentieth century and there has been a more than doubling in the amount of ice mass loss in the planets two largest ice sheets with East Antarctica showing signs of doing the same thing.

So any rational person can now see than an exponential doubling period has been established and we will be watching to see if it holds up over time.

Just One meter would be an economic catastrophe mackdaddy Apr 2015 #1
...for each meter of sea level rise, the coastline is eroded, over time, by 100 meters. xrm67 Apr 2015 #2
Good links , Thanks mackdaddy Apr 2015 #3
I wish they wouldn't say generations and use years yeoman6987 Apr 2015 #26
“The greatest shortcoming of the human race is our inability to understand the exponential function. dixiegrrrrl Apr 2015 #4
But what says sea level rise is exponential? muriel_volestrangler Apr 2015 #5
Death by fire and flood xrm67 Apr 2015 #6
The PIOMAS model is a linear trend of -3000 km3/decade muriel_volestrangler Apr 2015 #8
Exponential, exponential, exponential... xrm67 Apr 2015 #9
And those uses of 'exponential' are incorrect muriel_volestrangler Apr 2015 #10
Freshwater ice melt from inland glaciers is not the same as old sea ice xrm67 Apr 2015 #11
That's the first time you've mentioned freshwater, or inland glaciers muriel_volestrangler Apr 2015 #13
If you actually read the article and know a little science, it would help xrm67 Apr 2015 #14
Freshwater pulses slowing down ocean currents has nothing to do with sea level or ice area muriel_volestrangler Apr 2015 #15
How else can I explain this to you before it sinks in? xrm67 Apr 2015 #16
Well done. GliderGuider Apr 2015 #17
No, no link about a meltwater pulse in your blog post muriel_volestrangler Apr 2015 #18
I will write a blog post about this and hopefully answer your questions once and for all. xrm67 Apr 2015 #19
Again, no doubling period has been 'established' for sea level rise muriel_volestrangler Apr 2015 #22
Doubling time of less than 5 years has been established. xrm67 Apr 2015 #24
2 data points for ice loss does not mean 'exponential sea level rise' muriel_volestrangler Apr 2015 #27
Any rational person can now see than an exponential doubling period has been established xrm67 Apr 2015 #28
If you watch the video of Box I linked to in #22, you see he got the 69 feet from Alley muriel_volestrangler Apr 2015 #30
We already have several data points showing exponential growth xrm67 Apr 2015 #31
Dear Baby Jebus, where do you get the patience? Systematic Chaos Apr 2015 #44
If it's in fits and starts, it's not exponential, by definition (nt) muriel_volestrangler Apr 2015 #45
That depends on the time frame, nicht war? GliderGuider Apr 2015 #48
Any process for something to be exponential while having gaps when nothing happens muriel_volestrangler Apr 2015 #52
Here is the real condition of Arctic sea ice and it's not good xrm67 Apr 2015 #33
Limits to Growth projections were correct... We're on track for collapse of industrial civilization xrm67 Apr 2015 #12
Limits to Growth projections were correct? LouisvilleDem Apr 2015 #21
Yes, I'm sure they're all wrong. Where's my TV remote? Pass me the buttered popcorn. xrm67 Apr 2015 #23
Nice try LouisvilleDem Apr 2015 #36
You really are Clueless xrm67 Apr 2015 #42
Where is your proof? LouisvilleDem Apr 2015 #53
How do you get exponentially declining sea ice... LouisvilleDem Apr 2015 #20
Earth Sensitivity to Human Forcings is what matters xrm67 Apr 2015 #25
What's your opinion of the Earth System sensitivity estimate by Wasdell et al GliderGuider Apr 2015 #29
I'd say it's not supported by the evidence LouisvilleDem Apr 2015 #34
LOL!!! One of the authors of that paper is a climate change denier xrm67 Apr 2015 #40
Judith Curry is not a denier LouisvilleDem Apr 2015 #51
And the other author has major credibility problems as well xrm67 Apr 2015 #41
You didn't answer my question LouisvilleDem Apr 2015 #35
ALL you have to do is look at the Keeling Curve xrm67 Apr 2015 #38
CO2 != Energy LouisvilleDem Apr 2015 #46
You can't possibly be this stupid. GliderGuider Apr 2015 #49
Please LouisvilleDem Apr 2015 #50
This definitely looks like exponential energy consumption xrm67 Apr 2015 #39
Question LouisvilleDem Apr 2015 #47
So this Climate Change Denier drive the bus of humanity off a cliff.... mackdaddy Apr 2015 #32
Predictions for the Future: A Grim Outlook xrm67 Apr 2015 #7
LOL LouisvilleDem Apr 2015 #37
Pointless comment xrm67 Apr 2015 #43
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Catastrophic Sea Level Ri...»Reply #28