Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Environment & Energy

FBaggins

(28,639 posts)

3. That's clever

Reply to Binkie The Clown (Original post)

Thu Sep 3, 2015, 01:54 PM

Sep 2015

In the end, I suspect that the incredibly slow pace of subduction (combined with the fact that the zones are almost always under the sea) probably rules it out.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Re: Nuclear waste, I've often wondered... [View all] Binkie The Clown Sep 2015 OP

That's been my favourite disposal idea for a long time. GliderGuider Sep 2015 #1

My guess is too much $$$$$. NV Whino Sep 2015 #2

That's clever FBaggins Sep 2015 #3

Why Not Dispose of Waste in Ocean Trenches? OKIsItJustMe Sep 2015 #4

Good points. Thanks for those answers. n/t Binkie The Clown Sep 2015 #5

You’re welcome! OKIsItJustMe Sep 2015 #6

You've hit on a big part of the best solution FBaggins Sep 2015 #7