Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

The2ndWheel

(7,947 posts)
17. That isn't a solution though
Fri Feb 12, 2016, 03:46 PM
Feb 2016

One reason being that not being able to fly isn't a "problem" per se. We just want to fly, even though we physically can't. We can't move at 55mph either, we just want to. Those wants create the perception of a problem in our minds, which then necessitate solutions, which don't really solve anything. Human beings still can't fly, so the problem wasn't solved.

The lack of instant global communication wasn't a problem that the internet solved. Our technology amplifies the abstract reality we're creating. We want what is in our heads to be real. The question is what will win; the human imagination, or physical reality? As with any battle, there will be unintended consequences. That can be the polar bears, of the rhinos, or the trees, or cows that we've molded to fit our interests, etc, etc, etc. It's really what the human experiment is about. How much of life, of existence, can humanity control?

Of course that also includes controlling humanity, because we can't just let ourselves do whatever it is that we want. That was be chaos. However, humans don't do well with limits. It's an interesting situation.

I had to decline yet another offer to fly, yesterday. Gregorian Feb 2016 #1
I lost my bike riding friend over my insistance Duppers Feb 2016 #6
two questions lapfog_1 Feb 2016 #2
I imagine it's calculated by plane capacity. Duppers Feb 2016 #4
that assumes lapfog_1 Feb 2016 #10
It was the only guesstimate Duppers Feb 2016 #19
First determine how much fuel a jet uses.... happyslug Feb 2016 #11
Great article. nt Duppers Feb 2016 #3
Unrealistic. The world economy and society would utterly collapse without airplanes. longship Feb 2016 #5
That's right: the economy is based on unreasonable constraints. Gregorian Feb 2016 #7
That isn't a solution though The2ndWheel Feb 2016 #17
Our global economy is built on unrealistic beliefs, such as infinite growth on finite resources NickB79 Feb 2016 #18
"What a silly argument." Good comment but misplaced. Nihil Feb 2016 #21
Well, you have a good argument. longship Feb 2016 #22
And to you too! Nihil Feb 2016 #23
A heartfelt K&R pscot Feb 2016 #8
This article was very real sue4e3 Feb 2016 #9
This solution addresses the author's cognitive dissonance GliderGuider Feb 2016 #12
And for that you deserve praise above all else. Duppers Feb 2016 #20
I loathe automobiles and airplanes, not only do they use fossil fuels... hunter Feb 2016 #13
Is this a fair metric? LouisvilleDem Feb 2016 #14
Same thing with buses vs cars, but nobody is giving up their cars there either The2ndWheel Feb 2016 #15
America's emissions come from cars, typically doing commutes past 2 miles MisterP Feb 2016 #16
A good (not great) Carbon Footprint calculator... NeoGreen Feb 2016 #24
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»How Far Can We Get Withou...»Reply #17