but they do show wider DU just how far they will crawl through the lower intestine of dialog in order to justify their bankrupted version of the truth.

If one attempts to argue that the Jews of Lehi (a terrorist group) are just, while they unsuccessfully conspired with the NAZIS to go to war against the British in Palestine, During WWII, then I must conclude...IMHO...that they will do, say or write anything: no matter how erroneous, no matter how corrupted and no matter how laughably asinine in order to promote a failed ideology.

To argue for Lehi's groveling before the scourge of Europe, the NAZIS, is tantamount to arguing for the Grand Mufti groveling as well.

But more importantly, your grasp of what is just is fallacious at best.

1. Lehi was responsible for British deaths in Palestine. Hardly a group that I, or anybody of good conscience, would applaud.

2. Lehi groveled to the NAZIS and attempten to conspire against the British in 1941.


To sum up.

The NAZIS were bloodthirsty monsters: intent on empire.

Lehi, a Jewish terror gang, were attempting to collaborate with bloodthirsty monsters.

Since Lehi, a Jewish terror gang, became part of the founders of Israel what does that make Israeli Zionism then?