Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
Showing Original Post only (View all)More on "reasonable" gun laws. [View all]
http://www.washingtontimes.com/blog/guns/2012/feb/8/miller-emily-got-her-gun/MILLER: Emily got her gun!
I finally got my gun in Washington, D.C. I brought it home today from the Districts firearms registry office.
After months of aggravation, hundreds of dollars in fees, countless hours jumping over hurdles, I am now a gun owner and finally exercising my second amendment right to keep arms (bearing arms is still illegal in the nations capital).
When I first started the Emily Gets Her Gun series, I thought I would be waiting in long lines and filling out lots of paperwork. I never could have imagined that the D.C. gun laws made it so unearthly difficult to get a legal handgun. However, I also never could have believed that this newspaper series would encourage change in Washington's gun laws.
The bad guys buy guns off the street in five minutes, and the city has no record of the transaction. Law-abiding citizens have to take a five-hour class that is only taught outside of the District, pay $465 in fees, sign six forms, pass a written test on gun laws, get fingerprinted, be subject to a police ballistics test and take days off work.
Anyone who thinks that the D.C. laws are "reasonable" should also volunteer to submit to similar laws for their other Civil Rights.
Thus far, I've never seen this occur. Hmmmm....
94 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
you know what they say about those ALL and NEVER sentences don't you.... FALSE
Tuesday Afternoon
Feb 2012
#4
I await a liberal news (or non-batshit-insane) outlet to do their own purchase saga.
krispos42
Feb 2012
#9
Just the type of purchaser the law IMO should be careful about licensing.
one-eyed fat man
Feb 2012
#43
oh yeah,,, let us do go there... I wondered if that was why you self-deleted.
Tuesday Afternoon
Feb 2012
#91
P.S. My apology for the snide tone, you've been nothing but polite and did not deserve that.
PavePusher
Feb 2012
#52
Cruikshank also said the 1st (right to assembly) did not apply to the states.
gejohnston
Feb 2012
#53
If DC was not violating the Second Amendment then why are they arguing how much they
burf
Feb 2012
#85
A certain honors graduate of Harvard Law (& lecturer at the U. of Chicago School of Law) disagrees:
friendly_iconoclast
Feb 2012
#93
Anything to say about the actual content? We'll wait while you sound out the bigger words.... n/t
PavePusher
Feb 2012
#36
"Whining" seems to be a synonym for "things I can't be arsed to refute"
friendly_iconoclast
Feb 2012
#41
according to what I read on here, that is the way the good citizens of those cities want it to be.
Tuesday Afternoon
Feb 2012
#38
I guess you haven't read all the threads in GD about CopHaters, then -- and how they
Tuesday Afternoon
Feb 2012
#72