Gun Control & RKBA

PavePusher

(15,374 posts)

34. Perhaps, as a "Constititional Law" teacher, can you explain this....

Wed Feb 22, 2012, 11:16 PM

Feb 2012

https://litigation-essentials.lexisnexis.com/webcd/app?action=DocumentDisplay&crawlid=1&doctype=cite&docid=58+Tul.+L.+Rev.+1073&srctype=smi&srcid=3B15&key=36e68ba987824d22199239525278688f

http://www.casebriefs.com/blog/law/constitutional-law/constitutional-law-keyed-to-chemerinsky/first-amendment-freedom-of-expression/minneapolis-star-and-tribune-company-v-minnesota-commissioner-of-revenue/

Harper v. Virginia State Board of Elections, 383 U.S. 663 (1966)
http://www.garretwilson.com/education/institutions/usf/law/constitutional/cases.html (a little less than half-way down the page).

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

94 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

More on "reasonable" gun laws. [View all] PavePusher Feb 2012 OP

all gun laws are unreasonable. free and open carry from birth to after death nt msongs Feb 2012 #1

WWJPIH? Warren Stupidity Feb 2012 #2

Thanks for the gratuitous hyperbole. PavePusher Feb 2012 #3

you know what they say about those ALL and NEVER sentences don't you.... FALSE Tuesday Afternoon Feb 2012 #4

Even you must admit the laws in DC are draconian ProgressiveProfessor Feb 2012 #28

Nah, he won't. TheWraith Feb 2012 #77

They win the right to own guns in court socialindependocrat Feb 2012 #5

I hear Somalia has some gun laws you might like. lastlib Feb 2012 #6

I'll bet I could even shoot in my own back yard!! socialindependocrat Feb 2012 #8

I hear North Korea has some YOU might like. Straw Man Feb 2012 #40

Marvellous sourcing - COLGATE4 Feb 2012 #7

I await a liberal news (or non-batshit-insane) outlet to do their own purchase saga. krispos42 Feb 2012 #9

The third distinct possibility - COLGATE4 Feb 2012 #10

Both D.C. and you seem to be mistaking "regulating" for "obstructing". PavePusher Feb 2012 #13

Don't bet on it. COLGATE4 Feb 2012 #16

"the State has a legitimate interest " beevul Feb 2012 #27

That's an interesting observation COLGATE4 Feb 2012 #45

That's not the issue krispos42 Feb 2012 #31

Do you believe that DC's regulations are reasonable? oneshooter Feb 2012 #33

Just the type of purchaser the law IMO should be careful about licensing. one-eyed fat man Feb 2012 #43

type of purchaser? gejohnston Feb 2012 #78

I guessed you missed the entire saga burf Feb 2012 #11

I don't believe that restrictions on firearm purchase COLGATE4 Feb 2012 #14

Ah, so the Amendments are not equal in weight and standing? PavePusher Feb 2012 #18

Having taught Constititional Law COLGATE4 Feb 2012 #20

Constititional Law ...??? Tuesday Afternoon Feb 2012 #22

At a distingished univirsity, no doubt... friendly_iconoclast Feb 2012 #32

Shhhppwwwwaaaaahhhh....... PavePusher Feb 2012 #35

Thomas M. Cooley School of Law, Lansing, Michigan COLGATE4 Feb 2012 #65

Appreciate your expertise. DanTex Feb 2012 #75

+1 ellisonz Feb 2012 #90

interesting - Tuesday Afternoon Feb 2012 #88

I was hesitant to go there gejohnston Feb 2012 #89

oh yeah,,, let us do go there... I wondered if that was why you self-deleted. Tuesday Afternoon Feb 2012 #91

Yes it was nt gejohnston Feb 2012 #92

This message was self-deleted by its author gejohnston Feb 2012 #76

Excellent. Can you explain to one of the great unwashed..... PavePusher Feb 2012 #30

Yep. US v Cruickshank COLGATE4 Feb 2012 #44

I think we're all typing with our elbows this week. PavePusher Feb 2012 #51

P.S. My apology for the snide tone, you've been nothing but polite and did not deserve that. PavePusher Feb 2012 #52

No problem. Happens to all of us. But thanks. COLGATE4 Feb 2012 #59

Cruikshank also said the 1st (right to assembly) did not apply to the states. gejohnston Feb 2012 #53

Yea, Chicago won the McDonald case. burf Feb 2012 #54

You are correct that the BOR was made applicable COLGATE4 Feb 2012 #60

again, do you believe that DC's lgun laws are reasonable? oneshooter Feb 2012 #61

I personally don't have any problem with COLGATE4 Feb 2012 #62

I have to disagree gejohnston Feb 2012 #68

After waiting from Oct 5th until the 3rd of Feb, burf Feb 2012 #70

So you would agree with using the same process in order to vote. oneshooter Feb 2012 #73

There are regulations and hurdles COLGATE4 Feb 2012 #82

complied with, but not respected gejohnston Feb 2012 #83

This discussion is rapidly reaching the COLGATE4 Feb 2012 #84

If DC was not violating the Second Amendment then why are they arguing how much they burf Feb 2012 #85

Because Heller was about whether COLGATE4 Feb 2012 #86

Then you would agree to the same process in order to vote. oneshooter Feb 2012 #74

You are mistaken. Firearm ownership is COLGATE4 Feb 2012 #81

A certain honors graduate of Harvard Law (& lecturer at the U. of Chicago School of Law) disagrees: friendly_iconoclast Feb 2012 #93

could you have picked better cases? gejohnston Feb 2012 #69

Try these COLGATE4 Feb 2012 #87

How do they contradict the majority opinion gejohnston Feb 2012 #94

:) discntnt_irny_srcsm Feb 2012 #21

That's not what he said at all. n/t ellisonz Feb 2012 #37

So, the poll taxes and tests required to vote would burf Feb 2012 #23

Did you take the time to evaluate the actual content? PavePusher Feb 2012 #12

Yes, I did. Try reading my answer Reply #14. COLGATE4 Feb 2012 #15

Let me see if I can get this straight. Dr_Scholl Feb 2012 #17

I'm not sure where you got the notion that a exercising a COLGATE4 Feb 2012 #19

Perhaps, as a "Constititional Law" teacher, can you explain this.... PavePusher Feb 2012 #34

I have the distinct gejohnston Feb 2012 #79

They didn't rule that "you can't tax a right". DanTex Feb 2012 #25

+1000 ellisonz Feb 2012 #58

This is actually more comparable to Vote ID laws ProgressiveProfessor Feb 2012 #29

Awesome! Tom Delay's former communications director writing for the WTimes! DanTex Feb 2012 #24

Anything to say about the actual content? We'll wait while you sound out the bigger words.... n/t PavePusher Feb 2012 #36

The content? Some wingnut whining about having register her guns? DanTex Feb 2012 #39

"Whining" seems to be a synonym for "things I can't be arsed to refute" friendly_iconoclast Feb 2012 #41

I think you missed the point gejohnston Feb 2012 #42

There's a leeeeeetle bit more to it than mere "registration"..... PavePusher Feb 2012 #50

Since the Supremes ruled in favor of gun ownership... spin Feb 2012 #26

according to what I read on here, that is the way the good citizens of those cities want it to be. Tuesday Afternoon Feb 2012 #38

While many of the citizens in thsoe cities... spin Feb 2012 #55

what slays me about DU is the way -- Tuesday Afternoon Feb 2012 #56

I feel a hell of a lot safer COLGATE4 Feb 2012 #66

And how do you determine that the cops are not also the idiots? oneshooter Feb 2012 #67

I guess you haven't read all the threads in GD about CopHaters, then -- and how they Tuesday Afternoon Feb 2012 #72

I don't know - could it be perhaps because COLGATE4 Feb 2012 #46

wrong guns gejohnston Feb 2012 #47

Check the British laws about simple and straightforward COLGATE4 Feb 2012 #48

since when did UK gejohnston Feb 2012 #49

He seems a little selective about what questions he answers. oneshooter Feb 2012 #57

See my response #61. I think it answers the question. COLGATE4 Feb 2012 #64

I don't pretend (as you do) to know the details of handgun COLGATE4 Feb 2012 #63

Pretending to know something (and being arrogant about it) gejohnston Feb 2012 #71

This message was self-deleted by its author gejohnston Feb 2012 #80