Number #91 is where they really get into it.
http://web.archive.org/web/20080529024602/http://www.tas-cas.org/d2wfiles/document/1085/5048/0/Pistorius+award+%28scanned+published+on+CAS+website%29.pdf
and BBC
"On the basis of the evidence brought by the experts called by both parties, the panel was not persuaded that there was sufficient evidence of any metabolic advantage in favour of the double amputee using the Cheetah Flex-Foot," the statement said.
The panel emphasised that their verdict only applied to the individual case of the South African.
It was also stressed that any advancements in the prosthetic-limb technology used by Pistorius could be contested by the IAAF again.
"The panel does not exclude the possibility that, with future advances in scientific knowledge, and a testing regime designed and carried out to the satisfaction of both parties, the IAAF might in future be in a position to prove that the existing Cheetah Flex-Foot model provides Oscar Pistorius with an advantage over other athletes."
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/olympics/athletics/7243481.stm
This post isn't meant to prove or disprove what I'm arguing, just info for readers of this thread.
= new reply since forum marked as read