Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Jim__

(14,120 posts)
38. First, you're trying to compare apples and oranges without full access to either.
Tue Dec 17, 2013, 12:27 PM
Dec 2013

Look at the abstract for Ulmer and Harris' study (my bolding):

Research has demonstrated that concentrated disadvantage and other measures are strongly associated with aggregate-level rates of violence, including across racial and ethnic groups. Less studied is the impact of cultural factors, including religious contextual measures. The current study addresses several key gaps in prior literature by utilizing race/ethnic-specific arrest data from California, New York, and Texas paired with religious contextual data from the Religious Congregations and Memberships Survey. Results suggest that, net of important controls, (1) religious contextual measures have significant crime-reducing associations with violence; (2) these associations are race/ethnic specific; and (3) religious contextual measures moderate the criminogenic association between disadvantage and violence for blacks. Implications for future research are discussed.


Their study seems to be mostly concerned with violent crime and how religiosity affects that. The percentages that you cite have to do with total federal inmate population. What percentage of federal inmates are in prison for the type of crime this study was concerned with?

Here are the conclusions the study reached:

• Black and white violence decreased significantly as the percentage rose of county residents who belonged to congregations or were regular attenders.
• Black and Latino violence was lower in communities where residents belonged to similar types of religious institutions, indicating faith groups from similar traditions were able to exert greater influence on community values when they had a significant presence.
• Religious homogeneity was not associated with overall rates of white violence, but further breakdowns showed communities with larger percentages of evangelicals had lower rates of white violence. Latino violence was significantly reduced in communities with large numbers of active Catholics.
• Black violence dipped dramatically in counties with high levels of poverty, unemployment and low levels of education where large percentages of residents were active in congregations. This is a key finding, as communities with severe social and economic disadvantages are more likely to have high violent crime rates.


You are citing percentages of inmates as evidence that religiosity doesn't reduce crime. But, suppose two counties were demographically similar except that one is more religious (note the breakdown of religious identity can be similar, but one has, say, higher church attendance) and that the more religious county had a significantly lower crime rate. Would that show up in the self-identified religious percentages of the inmates from those counties?

You need more information to come to any conclusions about that study.
Way to score one for your team, cbayer! trotsky Dec 2013 #1
A curious suggestion... Act_of_Reparation Dec 2013 #2
Do they identity as religious once they are arrested and incarcerated or before that? cbayer Dec 2013 #4
So when compared with other countries that are similar in other major socioeconomic factors, trotsky Dec 2013 #7
It is extremely inconsistent Act_of_Reparation Dec 2013 #9
The United States is atypical okasha Dec 2013 #11
And I say again... Act_of_Reparation Dec 2013 #13
Can you cite a study which shows okasha Dec 2013 #21
Certainly Act_of_Reparation Dec 2013 #22
You answered a question I didn't ask. okasha Dec 2013 #23
I believe what you're asking was never actually a claim made by the person you're replying to. eqfan592 Dec 2013 #24
O rly? Act_of_Reparation Dec 2013 #32
Okay. Another question. okasha Dec 2013 #34
What is the source for your claim that the 0.07% includes unaffiliated believers? Jim__ Dec 2013 #33
+1 okasha Dec 2013 #35
The inclusion of unaffiliated was my misunderstanding Act_of_Reparation Dec 2013 #36
"doubly dubious"... heh trotsky Dec 2013 #37
That is essentially what is being alleged... Act_of_Reparation Dec 2013 #40
First, you're trying to compare apples and oranges without full access to either. Jim__ Dec 2013 #38
No, I'm not Act_of_Reparation Dec 2013 #39
Yes, you are. Jim__ Dec 2013 #41
No, I'm not Act_of_Reparation Dec 2013 #42
Racial/ethnic criteria are the basis for the studies conclusion. Jim__ Dec 2013 #43
If you're going to continue stuffing words in my mouth, this is going to get rather pointless Act_of_Reparation Dec 2013 #44
Don't tell me I'm stuffing words in your mouth. Jim__ Dec 2013 #45
And we're done here Act_of_Reparation Dec 2013 #46
Louisiana has some of the highest rates of poverty and lowest scores in cbayer Dec 2013 #16
Interestingly, if you look at previous studies published by this David Briggs fellow... trotsky Dec 2013 #17
...his results are internally consistent, so he must be doctoring them? Donald Ian Rankin Dec 2013 #18
Whose results? Act_of_Reparation Dec 2013 #19
I think you need to think through your post a little more. n/t trotsky Dec 2013 #20
Then there is this…. safeinOhio Dec 2013 #3
It's really unclear what any of that means. cbayer Dec 2013 #5
Yep, unclear. safeinOhio Dec 2013 #6
Atheists tend to be more economically privileged. rug Dec 2013 #8
In other words, religion is not the deciding factor. eqfan592 Dec 2013 #25
My own words are fine. Especially compared to a mistatement. rug Dec 2013 #26
You call it a misstatement, then make a statement that says otherwise. eqfan592 Dec 2013 #27
That's because it is. I won't repeat myself. rug Dec 2013 #28
No need to repeat anyway, as the conversation is visible to all. eqfan592 Dec 2013 #29
Oh, I thought this was posted in invisible pixels. rug Dec 2013 #30
Lol, just for you, rug. nt eqfan592 Dec 2013 #31
I wonder if it's specific to religious communities or if strong community ties would suffice. Jim__ Dec 2013 #10
I agree that there are a lot of variables at play here. cbayer Dec 2013 #14
I can think of other ways the data is skewed intaglio Dec 2013 #12
As I said above, there are so many variables at play here. cbayer Dec 2013 #15
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»No Time For Crime: More R...»Reply #38