Religion
In reply to the discussion: what is the most important aspect of the interaction between belivers and non believers [View all]Goblinmonger
(22,340 posts)Everytime you get into a discussion about darn near anything, you have studied for a long time.
What I find most entertaining is that you claim epistemology as the basis for this. Understanding the etymology of the words would go a long way in helping your understanding of the words.
And I'm also wondering if all of your fine friends here know, when you refer to Ayer, that your view of ignosticsm (at least should) approachs the concept of god as nonsensical. They might not like that take. I mean, claiming you are ignostic puts you in the same vein as Sam Harris and we all know how much the theists here LOVE Sam Harris.
I'm interested on your take of Ayer's near death experience.
And Drange just changes the meaning of what theism and gnosticism are to fit his false linearity of atheist---agnostic---believer while completely ignoring the etymology of the words. Much like you. But you are so very well educated I'm sure your research into those words go beyond just Drange.