Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
4. If not a Scientologist than certainly an apologist.
Thu Apr 2, 2015, 10:06 AM
Apr 2015
And Scientology charges a lot of money because maintenance of the buildings is expensive.


Unless the religion actually requires them to have 'really expensive to maintain buildings' that's a totally bogus excuse for milking the suckers.

Edit: I retract my statement about apologist. The linked article currently does not actually include the line about building maintenance. I don't know if the author updated, or the line in the OP was supposed to be a paraphrase, but I don't feel the author deserves to be judged on something he's not actually saying.
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»"Going Clear" f...»Reply #4